Kinsa jud imo gituohan kung diin jud tah gikan, ang Bible or Science?

**jet** · 07-30-2010, 03:57 PM

Originally Posted by schmuck

religious miracles? nope.

general. dili religious. general as in life bah.

aw well there you go. imu pud na. di ka mu tuo. dba? mura rasad na sa ako nga mu tuo ko ug miracles. kay ako pud ni.

no other comments

**skoilhp** · 07-30-2010, 03:58 PM

if talking about biological life from birth to death, science maybe, but if talking about spiritual life, bible and maybe other scriptures, lisod man ni ky spirit and body are 2 very different things... but we need to have both so that we can exist here sa earth, so for now, we need science and bible, then if we fully understood and combined both, then it will be time to study further

**SPRINGFIELD_XD_40** · 07-30-2010, 06:57 PM

Originally Posted by AMD_fan

Ikaw mo figure out? ka kuyaw ani... bantug ra daghan kaayo denominations and christianity... Bisag sa mga pari sa mga katoliko mag lalis pa ani... Sauna panahon agree nga literal jud ang bible pero pag abot sa science nga ni anam2x na pag contradict sa bible, na himo na nuong fables ang uban...

Because daghan kaayo factors ngano to include and limit to factions , beliefs , business and most of all corruption . That is true but then , we tend to say contradict tungod kay we only think inside the box . If we think more deeper matched with analogy , daghan kaayo mo corelate .

So para nimo gi unsa pag himo ang tao kung dli pa literal ang genesis?

For me personally ? Not basing anything at all sa beliefs na gi instill according sa uban ? That the Book of Genesis portrays Adam and Eve as our first parents but it doesnt mean they are the very first people who surfaced out in earth . Do you really think the Garden of Eden is real also ? The FRUIT of LIFE and DEATH ? The devil in the form of a SERPENT ? They portray something unless you believe in them LITERALLY then contradict jud sa SCIENCE .

Uu pero I'm not talking about babies being taller now... what I mean is kung asa kutob gitason ang mga tao... hehehe..

Last time I check unless I did not read it right ... you said lahi ang mga tao karon compare before . Just correct me if I am wrong .

Ngano mahabilin man? Naa mn puy natural selection...
Ako ra gi explain ang process sa pag evolve sa usa ka part... Mo adapt mn pud na sa imong lihok...
pareha ana imong tudlo sa tiil, kana gamit kaayo na sa mga unggoy kay mura pud na ug kamot ang ilang tiil para katkat kahoy unya na dugay ni evolve sa mga tao nga ni gamay ang tudlo sa tiil kay wa na mana gamit, mo walk naman ta upright... what do you think unsay gamit sa tudlo sa tiil sa mga tao if designed pa na? How about atong tailbone, unsay nganong ingon ana gihapon na ug porma? How about imong totoy? ug gi design pa na sa ginoo nga ni ingon iyang gi una ug himo ang lalake, unsay gamit sa totoy?

- That is the xplanation but its not certain yet . Atbangan man sad na ngano nagpabilin man ang unggoy unya ni evolve ang uban . is there such a term na ELECTIVE PROCESS ? Ug ako ang unggoy mo ingon jud ko na its unfair ! Ako unggoy lang gihapon kamo dili na .

- Yes nawala na ang purpose sa atong tudlo kay di na man ta mo kapyot ug saka s akahoy but like I said , ngano ang mga tribesmen normal na man ang lhysical appearance nila ? They live in the wilderness but it doesnt mean magsaka saka sila kay if mao ng storyaha , you are suggesting na if ang unggoy mo puyo sa city magka mubo pod ang fingers nila but then mo ingon ka na in a million years pa na mahitabo hehehe .... again not in our lifetime so walay maka conclude jud .

The first sports car was in 1934 and the first automobile was invented in 1672... ka layo ra... hehehe...

Well you are right based on historical timeline but we are speaking of modern automobiles kay you cant compare a steam propelled automobile with a gas/diesel powered automobile . UNless again that is taken literally . But you are right na layo ra jud ang gap sa 2 basing only sa statement nako .

Pero bro ayaw kalimte nga ang evolution is accepted both a theory and a fact... Like sa genetics, dli gyud na nimo mabuwag sa evolution.... and it's still not certain for you?

If that is the case .... then dili tinuod na we came from INBREEDING kay there are many genes na karon compared if mo based lang ta sa 2 ka tao ang basehan right ?

Unya para nimo mas certain pa ang wa ta kaila kinsay ga suwat, panahon pa sa pag uso sa religion ang pag suwat ug wala gyuy ebidensya bisag gamay man lang...

Same ra pod na sa kadtong ga discuss about BIGBANG and whatever happened 4.6 BILLION YEARS ago .

How would it relate?

Microorganisms , oxygen , cells , air , photosysnthesis , sunlight , shade , ecosystem etc ... di ba these are all in the creation also ?

Sakto ka... pero naa may ebidensya nga makita nimo... dli pareha sa bibliya nga pulos lng suwat nga walay ikapakita...

Unsay ebidensya bro ? Nga kita gikan sa unggoy ? Ngano ma trace man ang family tree Roman soldiers and they were mentioned a bible ? Ngano daghan pa kaayo gospels na uncovered sa Holy land and they were the part of the bible ? Ngano pagka daghan sa miracles ni occur and the bible talks about it ? I am not saying SCIENCE is wrong , I do believe in it but if you say also na sayop ang bible would not be right pod .

**tripwire** · 07-31-2010, 12:13 AM

Originally Posted by schmuck

Kung muingon ko'g nisturya akong iro nako. Most likely ingnon ko nga ga-hallucinate ko or naa koi mental condition. Pero naa lagi nag hisgot og bitin nga mustorya, dili lagi dudahan kung ga hallucinate ba tong taohana. hmm...

How about, "the talking... burning shrub...?". Maybe he was hallucinating too because the shrub he burnt was a diacetylmorphine.

**weng opon** · 07-31-2010, 12:18 AM

science.......

**schmuck** · 07-31-2010, 12:45 AM

Originally Posted by tripwire

How about, "the talking... burning shrub...?". Maybe he was hallucinating too because the shrub he burnt was a diacetylmorphine.

stoner moses lol

**AMD_fan** · 07-31-2010, 04:00 AM