hehheheh..kataw-anan brod.
Tubaga ni brod ai,,,YouTube - The New Age Movement - The Lie of the Serpent - 1
maybe makasugat ka ug mga occultist karon nga time bah. another topic ni sya![]()
hehheheh..kataw-anan brod.
Tubaga ni brod ai,,,YouTube - The New Age Movement - The Lie of the Serpent - 1
maybe makasugat ka ug mga occultist karon nga time bah. another topic ni sya![]()
Apologist have their own way of explanation. You cannot dictate them! Is that your basis of calling somebody as "good apologist" by that example? Don't be afraid. Just try to raise your most logical question. You are very welcome to themHere's the link again...www.rzim.com
Can you explain your side about the flaws of the trinity? Please.....maybe I can learn something new. Hopefully!
its useless to explain it to this poster. because he completely discredits the facts in the Bible about Jesus divinity but just selects few facts proving Jesus as a man.
This is clearly Biased
What we believe is that Jesus was both Man and God. They believe in Jesus as a man they are right but Jesus is also a God and they ignore it.
Last edited by Kenshiro; 04-15-2011 at 11:40 PM. Reason: simplified explanation.
we could also say the same thing to you sir.
aren't your beliefs based only on the Bible, and that other scriptures are "works of Satan"?
Didn't you say that Christ's sacrifice was for "all mankind"? Which "all" is that then? Just the believers? Then his sacrifice is not for all then, is it? Just for the benefit of the few. Contradicting au na inyo beliefs, mao btw nihawa ko dha. Way klaro ang mga tigtudlo. Puro mystery2x and so on and so forth is mysterious. God is no mystery. And did I say I was sinless? No, I NEVER did sir. I only said I was doing everything in my life to be pleasing to God. I dedicate everything I do everyday to him. Where's the part in which I claimed I was sinless with that?
This is for people with reasonable minds.
Christ died for all who accepted this sacrifice and repented.
"For all who repented and accepted his sacrifice." How hard is that to understand.
Christ died for all but the problem is have they accepted Christ sacrifice and have repented?
Again I don't want to argue you, you let me keep on repeating the things I have already mentioned. You keep going in circles because you won't listen. Don't try to trick me with your word game.
Where do you get your sources anyway your pastor?
No matter how you think how Good you are you are not upto the standard of God's rightenousness even the pharisees think they are Good.
Last edited by Kenshiro; 04-16-2011 at 03:45 AM. Reason: additional explanation
Sir with all due respect wala nakay lain kay ika buga. Your just keep repeating things over and over and over. that doesn't give you the reason to say something reasonable. and your playing word games.
mura ko nakig lalis ug gubang plaka.
Last edited by Kenshiro; 04-16-2011 at 03:52 AM.
Word game? Where's the word game in that? Aren't you playing the word game? You say that Christ died for all mankind. Now it's just for those who repented and accepted his sacrifice? Some sacrifice I would say as far as your theory goes. So he came only for those who accepted him. So his sacrifice was ultimately for those who followed him. Screw those that never knew or were ignorant of his ministry and teachings. Screw those that were born before he came. That's ACCORDING to your theory.
Pastor sir? I bet you won't be able to refute what he would have to say if he were in my place. And he ain't no pastor as well. He got all that he teaches me from his spiritual master, and so on and so forth. Want a list of all their names? The list goes beyond Christ itself. We don't preach or spread anything that is manufactured. We only speak whatever we were taught.
Some "merciful" God you portray now, is it? At least my perception of God and his servants is better. When his servants descend, they do sacrifice, but not blood sacrifice like you believe. They do sacrifice their lives to DELIVER people, not through self-inflictment of punishment or being crucified or by whatever, but by TEACHING PEOPLE that TRUE salvation is ONLY through LOVING God with all you heart, all your mind, your entire being. You and every other "Christian" want the easy way out. You want Christ to die, so that your sins are absolved or whatever as to what you believe. I DON'T. It would pain me greatly if someone had to suffer for whatever I did. But not you. It doesn't elicit any slight pity on what Christ had to go through. It may, but it is not actual pity, since you still believe that Christ died for a right purpose. Haven't you thought about ACTUALLY doing something so that Christ's death was not in vain? Like following his instructions for example? Did he say specifically ANYWHERE in the Bible that you have to "glorify" his crucifixion in order to be saved? No. What did he answer when he was asked that what would be his GREATEST COMMANDMENT? The word GREATEST is key there. It means NOTHING ELSE SUPERSEDES IT. Yet you keep pushing forward his crucifixion as SOMETHING that supersedes it. Well? Now why is that? Are you or any priest better than Jesus that you should alter his message?
Similar Threads |
|