i believe those pictures from the lunar landing is just a representation of their actual landing. just to imitate the actual feeling of landing there since it is hard to take photos while your on a suit
i believe those pictures from the lunar landing is just a representation of their actual landing. just to imitate the actual feeling of landing there since it is hard to take photos while your on a suit
You've got a point there.
Under vacuum, it hard to move a muscle with those space suit on.
But they claimed that the camera at the time was so advance, it had auto focus and every high tech features a modern camera has. it was '60s. 50 years now. maybe technology hasn't changed much.
just a quick question which might have been answered na....
boss spring, ngano wala man tumba pakilid ang twin towers? ngano pa-ubos man gyud? just wondering....
.
The Hasselblad Cameras taken during Apollo was a MANUAL camera.
It had NO autofocus.
It had NO automatic exposure.
It had NO automatic shutter speed.
Then you ask "then how come clear kaayo ilang mga photos?" LOL are you saying you have you seen the ENTIRE collection of film rolls? If so, from which mission? Or maybe all? All of the more than 800 rolls of film?
See, the problem with some people is, they only see what is available to them, and in the case of the Apollo photos, the ones you see were the good ones that were picked out from the hundreds of rolls (picked out by people from Time, Life Magazine, and other publications--I mean if I was the photo editor of a famous magazine back then, why would I choose a blurry or underexposed shot, naturally ang i-select nako katong mga clearest shots, para mahalin akong magazine). Only roughly 40% of Apollo surface photo film rolls have focused, well-lit and well-framed--the rest kay bati...want examples?
Did you know Neil Armstrong DOESN'T HAVE ANY GOOD PHOTOS of himself during the AP11 EVA? The only good ones are of Buzz Aldrin. According to Aldrin, he "forgot" to take good "posed" photos of Neil because Nixon called them up during that schedule in their timeline (the Nixon call was not part of the mission timeline, so Buzz wasn't expecting it, throwing him off his sequence of shots)...and the sad part is, BATI pa dyud mga photos nga gikuha of Neil...here are totally UNEDITED raw frames from the Hasselblad, the ONLY photos of Neil Armstrong on the moon, bati kaayo...
(backgrounder...the Hasselblad cameras had square films, and the photographic plate had crosshairs or fiducials, which you can see in the photos)
Underexposed shot of Neil, you can barely see him...Buzz forgot to set the exposure setting right for shadow photography. So you still claim the photos are perfect?
Well-framed shot? Buzz was supposed to take Neil's photo as of this point along with the LM's gold-colored landing gear strut and claimed he did, but he didn't frame the shot properly, so tiil lang ni Neil nakitan. And yet still claim the photos are perfect?
Lots more examples here (in fact the ENTIRE rolls for AP11 are here):
Apollo 11 Image Library
-RODION
Last edited by rodsky; 03-27-2011 at 12:57 AM.
I am no Engineer by any stretch pero I'd like to hear what you all think of this?
http://www.jod911.com/WTC%20COLLAPSE...d%208-8-06.pdf
Is there anyone here familiar or concur with monetary and banking conspiracy(s) in the world? I believe that currency is robbing the general populous and enslaving country's and individuals in inescapable debt... I'm currently studying in my own time financial and bank related topics and writing a paper on them. Any thoughts or facts would be greatly welcome!
As for the 9.11 conspiracy's, one should watch "loose change" and "zeitgeist" both of which are available on YouTube... both are quite proactive in nature.
-lionchild
asa gani ni na studio?
Similar Threads |
|