conspiracy theories

[eternitycontract]

---

what he was talking about was the standard way of using scientific method... which has always worked, and continues to work until this day. mga conspiracy theorists, they may be using "science", but mu likoy sila sa scientific method... mao to'y pasabot niya.

ang2 kay ang iya mang scientific method iyang basihan sa ato pa tanan idealists nga wa nisapul sa iyang ganhan nga result ug nakita nga result sayop na ug likoy na ingnon dayon wala ni subay sa scientific method cha cha cha.. taya.. di sad tawn na makiglalis ang mga conspiracy theorists kung wala silay bala nga scientific based uie nganong mu stock man ta ani nga quote sad tawn uie atot..

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

Asa gikan imong common sense bro?

Ngano ako man ang gipangutana nimo ana ?

heres another picture
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/...IST_RFC_07.jpg

Can you post the very same picture sourced out from a different site not sponsored by the CONSPIRACY THEORIST ?

now tell me with that engineering genius for a structure,
do you think a tank full of kerosene can bring it down?
by the way, kerosene ang jet fuel.

Kerosene diay na ang JP5 ?

hahaha, clap clap.
authenticity of the image.

news helicopters gakuha ana bro.

unsay tan-aw nimo ana?
gastilts ang photographer?

Whats with the SARCASTIC COMMENT ? Dili diay pwede mo request ug credibility sa pictures na gi provide nimo ? Who si the source ? If helicopter ang ga kuha , kins ani sila ?

With all due respect Sir.
wala nako kinahanglana imong "bilib".
ang akong gikinahanglan nga respetaran nimo ang thread nga akong gihimo para madiscuss ang unsay nahitabo sa 911.

Wala man sa dko ni sulti na mo hatag ko ug bilib nimo , nagpahibalo lang ko na padong na mawala . Anyways , why is there to say that you need to be respected ? Am I DISRESPECTING you diay ?

Moderator gud ka.
Palihug lang.
Ok ra nako kung mo take kag side. no problem.
Just do it point by point.
Dili kay asta rason nganung gipatay ang researcher imo pang pangayuon nako.
Or kung kinsay gakuha ana nga picture.

Of course I have to do that before I can go on so that all VALID POINTS can be taken !! Abi kay pabor na nimo ang issue sakay pod ka sa front sit ? On my behlaf , I am not bias sa findings because I am buying their investigation , conclusion and I am confident of being convince for what is the truth .

You are trying to discredit everything I post without basis.
Just because you can do it?
Play fair this time.

Just because I can do it ? I dont think so , you also did that to th site I provided right ? Its CRAP for you without even reading and analyzing it lol . I never discredit your post , I only asked for VALIDITY . Why dont you compare our sources and see which shows more INTEGRITY .

Can we just discuss the real science behind all the things that happened in 911?
And not based it on NIST report.

You cant discuss anything about 9-11 SCIENTIFICALLY because all your basis are gathered from sites that are conspiracy theory sponsored pages as much as when I sourced out the DEBUNKING of 9-11 questions by you guys . Right doc ?

Who headed the NIST report?
a governor, a politician, what is his experience in this?
since when did a politician tells his people the truth?
Who funded those researchers?
And how big is the fund?
3 million dollars? it a joke compared to the jfk investigation fund or any other investigations in the U.S. history.

Indeed you are all good in speculating . ENGINEERS , FIREFIGHTERS , SCIENTIST , people who are CREDIBLE , EXPERTS and has more KNOWELDGE than you conducted it . Whats more in there to ask ? of course mo sulti man gyud ka ug BINAYRAN sila , I understand that and I take that as a measure and gage of your knowledge as much as how you discredit also the contents of the site without even checking it out and concluding dayon na CRAP . Ikaw ang angay pakpakan nako doc .

OT:
Its really ironic that you sir asked for unofficial evaluation about moderators.
How would you think I evaluate you?

Why dont you evaluate me then . As long as its in the perimeter of the RULES and REGULATIONS , its fine with me . Now what is so IRONIC about that ? Lagpasa na nimo oi .

You already accused me of spreading lies....
You bug me with your readings I dont want to read....

When did I accused you of SPREADING LIES ? Can you point it out to me ? Hahahaha !! There you go doc , if you only read that source I provided , it will ANSWER all your QUESTIONS .

I only read significant truths,
not manufactured lies signed by so called experts appointed by the government.

Look who is talking ? WHo is now SPREADING LIES ? Justify na the people involved are SO CALLED EXPERTS and are LIARS . Mind you , wala ra ka sa kumingking ani nila when it comes to EXPERTISE .

Why cant we just respect each others opinions.
Let them think what they want to think.

You should start with yourself . How can people RESPECT you if you think the INVESTIGATION done by these so called experts matod nimo are CRAP ?

[-==ahylingel==-]

^ kalma lang mo.. peace out..

[Gac]

about 911?
based on what i saw on tv, pictures and videos.
I think the american public were lied to by their government.
It is as simple as that.

nindto kayo imong tubag doc. salamat Now so basi ra gyud diay ni tanan sa imong nakit'an sa video. pero wala sad ceguro nimo tan'awa doc on the other side that therz also a video that denys this alligation about the conspiracy... now karon doc unsa man gyud fact or fiction...Yes or No Doc. is as simple as that as you say pero maowaw gihapon ka nga motobag..... salamat doc nag check langko before ko mo out.... to be continue.......>>>>

[dilcue_85]

kani nidot.lol

[dilcue_85]

wooow murag science vs religion

[dilcue_85]

ganahan koi ani na

[peterpan1980]

aw..tua sa link gihatag ni springy ai.. kusog kaayo energy ma release anang pancaking oi.

unsay pancake? tan-awa ragud ning mga pictures sa link usab gud..

BuildingWhat? - Building 7 | Stand with the 911 families demanding a NEW Building 7 investigation - What is Building 7 ?

klaro na anang gi demolish ang building 7. Lig-on intawn kaayo na do, headquarters gud na sa new your city mayor.

grabeh naman pud ka bogo sa taw mangita pa gyd ug losot bisag klaro na kaayo gi demolish ang building 7.

grabeh napud..

religion naman na.. fanaticism sa mga anti conspiracy theorist inyo..

to-o gyd sa sayop bisan obvious na kaayo ..

nya makita gamay explanation nga wala gi demolish ang building 7.

to-o dayon..

grabeh napud..

unbelievable gyd mga taw diri sa istorya.net

[jangska]

911 attack.....ang pag ataki sa planes kai na detect nato daan....wala gi balda sa U.S. government..para naai gubat...dako man og ginanxa ang U.S. sa arms business.....nabasahan ni nako sa usa ka magazine....kalimot ko sa title..hehehehe

kita kos national geographic ani bai kahibaw naman cla ato nya gi personal pa gae ingnan si bush ato nga naay coded tawag nga na intercept ang fbi or cia ba to pero wala niya gi mind.ahaha..

sa cia daghan jud clag ipatumba kung sobra na imong nahibawaan..

[Soul Doctor]

Ngano ako man ang gipangutana nimo ana ?



Can you post the very same picture sourced out from a different site not sponsored by the CONSPIRACY THEORIST ?



Kerosene diay na ang JP5 ?



Whats with the SARCASTIC COMMENT ? Dili diay pwede mo request ug credibility sa pictures na gi provide nimo ? Who si the source ? If helicopter ang ga kuha , kins ani sila ?



Wala man sa dko ni sulti na mo hatag ko ug bilib nimo , nagpahibalo lang ko na padong na mawala . Anyways , why is there to say that you need to be respected ? Am I DISRESPECTING you diay ?



Of course I have to do that before I can go on so that all VALID POINTS can be taken !! Abi kay pabor na nimo ang issue sakay pod ka sa front sit ? On my behlaf , I am not bias sa findings because I am buying their investigation , conclusion and I am confident of being convince for what is the truth .



Just because I can do it ? I dont think so , you also did that to th site I provided right ? Its CRAP for you without even reading and analyzing it lol . I never discredit your post , I only asked for VALIDITY . Why dont you compare our sources and see which shows more INTEGRITY .



You cant discuss anything about 9-11 SCIENTIFICALLY because all your basis are gathered from sites that are conspiracy theory sponsored pages as much as when I sourced out the DEBUNKING of 9-11 questions by you guys . Right doc ?



Indeed you are all good in speculating . ENGINEERS , FIREFIGHTERS , SCIENTIST , people who are CREDIBLE , EXPERTS and has more KNOWELDGE than you conducted it . Whats more in there to ask ? of course mo sulti man gyud ka ug BINAYRAN sila , I understand that and I take that as a measure and gage of your knowledge as much as how you discredit also the contents of the site without even checking it out and concluding dayon na CRAP . Ikaw ang angay pakpakan nako doc .



Why dont you evaluate me then . As long as its in the perimeter of the RULES and REGULATIONS , its fine with me . Now what is so IRONIC about that ? Lagpasa na nimo oi .



When did I accused you of SPREADING LIES ? Can you point it out to me ? Hahahaha !! There you go doc , if you only read that source I provided , it will ANSWER all your QUESTIONS .



Look who is talking ? WHo is now SPREADING LIES ? Justify na the people involved are SO CALLED EXPERTS and are LIARS . Mind you , wala ra ka sa kumingking ani nila when it comes to EXPERTISE .



You should start with yourself . How can people RESPECT you if you think the INVESTIGATION done by these so called experts matod nimo are CRAP ?

The so called conspiracy theorists found out that all the reports submitted by real researchers were edited out.
Example, when researches reported that the level of asbestos in ground zero is not safe. the government edited it out and said it is ok to go back to ground zero.
this caused a lot of deaths to the firefighters and volunteers and civilians. all due to that doctored report.
even bomb sniffing dogs died after the 911 attack due to exposure to asbestos in the area.

the government should have warned those poor beings.
Even their lies has killed more people long after the 911.
And you want me to take their report without question?