conspiracy theories

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

---

I am asking what kind of simulator Rodsky was using.I'm just showing you the simulator that people in that industry was using.Not to mention that you have to memorize the cockpit instruments and stuff.

Again , I am still not getting the drift you are trying to empahsized here . Maski pila pa ka video links i provide nimo , whats the point ? Do you know how big the industry is and its justifided with 4 video links just to make a point ?

Your video links and the type of simluator RODSKY is talking bout are 2 different things , everyone knows that . But the point and issue being tackled here is , ang gipasabot ni RODSKY to the best of my understanding is FUNCTIONAL to make his point clear ninyo .

[peterpan1980]

doc how about sko gi answer sa imo mga question? or sa link na gihatag ni fafa springy?

Maybe he is referring to Building 7(obviously 100% demolished) not the twin towers.

BuildingWhat? - Building 7 | Stand with the 911 families demanding a NEW Building 7 investigation - What is Building 7 ?

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

About building 7 and its related " CONSPIRACY THEORIES " explained .

Take time to read and digest , kay if we only rely on video's , sometimes our not so perfect vision can play tricks and maybe command a bias decision that favors our stand .

Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition - World Trade Center 7, Building 7

[pantaleon]

Again , I am still not getting the drift you are trying to empahsized here . Maski pila pa ka video links i provide nimo , whats the point ? Do you know how big the industry is and its justifided with 4 video links just to make a point ?

Your video links and the type of simluator RODSKY is talking bout are 2 different things , everyone knows that . But the point and issue being tackled here is , ang gipasabot ni RODSKY to the best of my understanding is FUNCTIONAL to make his point clear ninyo .

OK! Wala nani sa topic back to the topic!

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

Since RODSKY made a challenge ninyo , isnt that hightime na i DEBUNK ninyo si RODSKY ?

Contact him , set up the computer he is talking about then once and for all , makita ang katag .

As of now ... RODSKY is providing valid points and information regarding sa issue sa CONSPIRACY THEORY and the HOAX about MOON LANDING na in reality tinuod siya nahitabo and di ni siya HOAX nor COINSPIRACY based on the evidences , proofs and studies being provided by Rodsky personally or borrowed information .

[neshem]

Maybe he is referring to Building 7(obviously 100% demolished) not the twin towers.

BuildingWhat? - Building 7 | Stand with the 911 families demanding a NEW Building 7 investigation - What is Building 7 ?

aw..tua sa link gihatag ni springy ai.. kusog kaayo energy ma release anang pancaking oi.

[Soul Doctor]

About building 7 and its related " CONSPIRACY THEORIES " explained .

Take time to read and digest , kay if we only rely on video's , sometimes our not so perfect vision can play tricks and maybe command a bias decision that favors our stand .

Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition - World Trade Center 7, Building 7

those so called debunking is just a cover story for what really happened.

no matter how heavy those debris were it would only scratch the building.

but what they really dont want people to know is that those witnesses, including tenants, news reporters
and firefighters who heard secondary explosions from the basement of the buildings. that was the most important testimonies. if you've seen one of the videos--- one man was actual thrown out in the air due to impact of the bomb explosion in the basement while he was running away. men and survivors from the ground floors suffered burns on their faces and swears there was an explosion in the basement, minutes before the building collapsed. those witnesses were never brought out.

actually i want you to mention those debunking one by one so i can say more about it.

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

those so called debunking is just a cover story for what really happened.

no matter how heavy those debris were it would only scratch the building.

but what they really dont want people to know is that those witnesses, including tenants, news reporters
and firefighters who heard secondary explosions from the basement of the buildings. that was the most important testimonies. if you've seen one of the videos--- one man was actual thrown out in the air due to impact of the bomb explosion in the basement while he was running away. men and survivors from the ground floors suffered burns on their faces and swears there was an explosion in the basement, minutes before the building collapsed. those witnesses were never brought out.

actually i want you to mention those debunking one by one so i can say more about it.

What you want is a DEBATE here , I provided already a link for you to read that DEBUNKS your 9-11 CONSPIRACY THEORY piece by piece and I specifically provided a link that refers to building 7 for your convenience . The funny thing is , you got your questions somewhere else . I got my answers somewhere else also for your questions .

The by product of it ? 2 ra gyud , ACCEPTANCE and DENIAL . This thread could have been locked before it even reached page 2 if you can only search for similar existing threads talking about CONSPIRACY THEORIES and specially about 9-11 bombings .

Ive been debating and exchanging pointers about 9-11 terrorist attacks since mga 2004 - 2005 pa , can you imagine that ?

All I ask from you is READ , READ and READ sa link na gi provide nako . Its not a fishy website that counters and debunks but a site that really makes sense . Its not made by someone else who just wants to make money unlike CONSPIRACY THEORIES FANATICS . Its backed by REAL TESTIMONIES , SCIENCE INVESTIGATION , CREDIBLE WITNESSES and many more .

[Soul Doctor]

we'll hear from somebody else who is willing to educate us by debunking one specific 911 theory and let other people response to that. so that together we can address those questions.

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

we'll hear from somebody else who is willing to educate us by debunking one specific 911 theory and let other people response to that. so that together we can address those questions.

Soul Doctor .... what is the difference if you read the reliable website I provided and copy and pasting the contents here ? Its NOT educate you , change your mindsetting na dili to 100 % demolition job to ang tower 7 gyud ?

Hehehehehe ... pastilan . Nobody is gonna educate you because it has been DEBUNKED years ago . The problem man gud is we didnt acquire these questions kay naa man ta basehan . Do you really think people will believe you na you knew about tower 7 is a work of a DEMOLITION ? Everyone knows and thought about that . Maybe if you can come up with your OWN QUESTION that there is a proof na 9-11 is a NOT a TERRORIST ATTACK then I will go toe to toe with you but there is none left to be answered and DEBUNKED .

Anyways .... if there is an urge for you DOC to discuss it with someone else then so be it . I already provided the tool and answers and if you think its not enough , we will wait for someone who can make you contented .