conspiracy theories

[strabolay]

---

naay dvd ani bro from ngc, daghan man gud claims nga hoax ra daw na xa (landing on the moon).

[Hammer_and_Sickle]

mao gani, impossible kay wala may hangin sa moon and space.
pero kung imong tan-awon ang mga video sa youtube, maklaro sa slowmo nga gibitay ra silag wire sama sa gibuhat sa sine kay moreflect man ang wire kung maigo sa light.

mao gyud, usa pud ang ilang space shuttle gi gamit , ka'y pwerteng pagka-weak sa makina, wala jud blast nahetabo sa surface sa moon,

[rodsky]

lets see how they explain why we can not see the stars in the moon landing pictures.

Everyone who uses an SLR or DSLR camera knows why.

It's all about exposure.

Clavius: Photography - exposure

-RODION

[Soul Doctor]

Everyone who uses an SLR or DSLR camera knows why.

It's all about exposure.

Clavius: Photography - exposure

-RODION

and with all those high definition cameras available in the us, the only video in the moon is fuzzy and blurry, black and white video with so called interference from time to time. how convenient.

im not a photo genius, but stars? you need a proper exposure for that?
not even a single star was caught on camera?
and the crosshairs
supposedly printed on the camera lens to prove its authenticity was cut and seemed to be behind one of the astronauts.

(as quoted from your reference earlier.)
"In short, the notions that it's too bright on the moon for photography, or that photographic film can't capture both lighted and shaded objects on the moon, are simply not realistic from the photographer's point of view. ".

the Van Allen belt, my friends, how can you explain how they passed through that without even a small effect of radiation.

[Soul Doctor]

Actually i like this part, the video of the astronauts on two different areas of the moon taken 3 days apart when they were supposedly surveying around the moon.

a video of a scene from the astronauts roaming around the moon was taken.
a day after, they took another picture or film of a supposedly different area of the moon.

and guess what?
its the same background and foreground.
haha, you should examine the video again.

[THE SKULLS]

dili man tingali ni kalupad.

[THE SKULLS]

the Van Allen belt, my friends, how can you explain how they passed through that without even a small effect of radiation.

let's investigate it ourselves;
1. do they have lead coating for the ship's surface?
2. were they wearing radiation proof suits?

[THE SKULLS]

mao gyud, usa pud ang ilang space shuttle gi gamit , ka'y pwerteng pagka-weak sa makina, wala jud blast nahetabo sa surface sa moon,

ato kuno try ug compute kung kaya ba sa makina nga mogawas sa gravitational pull sa moon

[miket07]

Ang challenge sa US ron kay i-focus ang hubble telescope sa lunar and ipaprove nila nga naa pa ang US flag og ang ubang butang nga gibilin nila didto..If wala, nangilad jud sila. Or they can do that but they can also manipulate the hubble telescope's output. Hightech na rba ta ron.

[rodsky]

and with all those high definition cameras available in the us, the only video in the moon is fuzzy and blurry, black and white video with so called interference from time to time. how convenient.

You're talking about the Apollo 11 footage--they carried a very crude TV camera. You mean you haven't seen Apollo 15-17 footage? Big difference, full color and 3x more resolution.

im not a photo genius, but stars? you need a proper exposure for that?
not even a single star was caught on camera?

You can't even see stars here on earth at night when you're standing under a lamp post. Now, you're standing on the moon and karon ang kontra nimo ang SUN--way way brighter than a lamp post, and now you're complaining about proper exposure?

and the crosshairs
supposedly printed on the camera lens to prove its authenticity was cut and seemed to be behind one of the astronauts.

You're referring to Rosseau Plates and the blooming effect that occurs when WHITE objects are being photographed. Go look for yourself--the "behind" effect only occurs when WHITE objects are being photographed. Read more here:
Clavius: Photography - crosshairs

the Van Allen belt, my friends, how can you explain how they passed through that without even a small effect of radiation.

Do you know that Apollo 14 commander Alan Shepard, and Apollo 13 CMP Jack Swigert both died of cancer? I even bet some of the other lunar explorers who are alive today have some form of cancer/tumor but are simply withholding their health status to the public because it's a personal/private matter. The fact is, these astronauts knew the risk--passing through an area NOT protected by the Van Allen Belts is indeed risky--it DOES increase the chances of getting some form of radiation sickness, whether mild or lingering or full blown...you have to understand that astronauts are the healthiest human beings at the moment they enter the space program due to the rigorous screening process--thus, they are ABOVE AVERAGE humans in terms of health, and thus their bodies tend to be more resistant to illness than most people, with a few exceptions (thus Shepard and Swigert).

Another point of contention--if you people are saying that the missions have been faked, why then gipa-uli ug sayo ang Apollo 16 (they cut the mission short), because of a reported solar flare that could have exposed the astronauts to even more serious harm, on the last day of the mission? Why not just say the mission was a success, tutal dili man sila ma expose sa radiation kay according to you, the mission was faked. So you see, your logic fails diha lang daan.

-RODION