
Originally Posted by
SPRINGFIELD_XD_40
@ VIEN ...
Sorry to butt in but let me ask you this , you read the ROMAN CATHOLIC BIBLE and your reference is not even close to be ROMAN CATHOLIC .
Now if you insist that Roman Catholic ang bible na gi read nimo , how true is it ? Does it have the NIHIL OBSTAT and IMPRIMATUR in the earlier pages ? if not then its not the ROMAN CATHOLIC BIBLE and yes , the birth of Christ there which is CHRISTMAS in the gospels of MATTHEW and LUKE likely being explained that it doesnt need a THEOLGIAN to interpret it .
Did you know that naay mga meaning na mga 3 magi's , guiding star , sheperds , barn , gold , incense and myrrh ? Even if wala si SANTA diha and the rest of the Christmas symbols , it doesnt mean it is wrong because these are mere tools to remind us of our duties .
If you want to see the Bible I read, I can show it to you bros, my mother purchased it at Sto. Rosario. Nihil Obstat and Imprimatur sorry bro ako sa tan-awon if naa ba. The birth of Christ was never been dated on Roman Catholic Bibles why need to be specific when it was none? No date. Now if you we try to trace those dates in jerusalem the place were found to be frozen because of snow on that very said date.
Mother Nature has it's Natural Evidence and it was found to be fraud when you probably say it's Dec. 25th. If in the other way you said it is the meaning of Christmas why we celebrated it, I should say why? On that very said date? your True God and Pagan God has similarities at all? You joined them? We can never serve two master at the same time. I still believe that Nature will provide the Natural Law, We cannot mix LIGHT WITH DARKNESS.