Wikipedia on RH Bill: after reading it, what is your stand?

[peewee_toot]

---

^^mao ni ang nka sasd sa pinas. daghan ayu dli educated or kuwang sa education...

[AmorsoloX]

for the RH-bill to succeed..

dapat mangusog jud sa part sa education... handing out of contraceptives is useless if you dont teach the people how to used them effectively...

the sad part is.. there are some groups who still insist on teaching only obsolete methods...

[Xilcher]

for the RH-bill to succeed..

dapat mangusog jud sa part sa education... handing out of contraceptives is useless if you dont teach the people how to used them effectively...

the sad part is.. there are some groups who still insist on teaching only obsolete methods...

and some groups teaching only the good benifits....the hidden agenda.. is not being asked..

I simply hate PAID surveys... WALA NA MUTUO SA SURVEYS!
The Datus are correct but ang wala gipakita ana..na pwde i manipulate ang questionaires

[peewee_toot]

for the RH-bill to succeed..

dapat mangusog jud sa part sa education... handing out of contraceptives is useless if you dont teach the people how to used them effectively...

the sad part is.. there are some groups who still insist on teaching only obsolete methods...

obsolete na gani... ngano itudlo pa mn jd? hahaiz...

[yhokz101]

Priest are not God... I'm a catholic.. but unlike you I did not serve as church volunteer.. but I dont praise Priest also.. My faith is direct to God...even the Pope can aged also..

But one thing.. i want to teach you that you never learned on your service...
"we are gifted of free will and to know right from wrong.. sin of some does not mean all are sinners.."

kung naa ka makit-an na dautan then i-generalize nimo tanan.. then thats wrong..
kung mu ingon ka mga hapon dautan kay mag suicide..think again dili tanan..
kung mu ingon ka mga german mamatay tao sama ni hitler...think again..

bottomline.. ikaw mag decide which is right in the end.... ayaw i base imoa life by observing others!

OT: By the way bro.. he doesn't know and recognizes freewill. That's the difference between you and him.. so mao ana ang iyang comment. He tend to generalize things.. particularly on the church.

OnT: I found SOME part of the RH bill strangely confusing and misleading so I cant say I'm on RH bill .. but I guess the scope and it's details should be made clear to the public.

"educating parents to be responsible, providing contraceptives to those who ask for them but not to promote. Responsible parenthood rather than reproductive health"

[neigyl_noval]

Gikan ni sa bill mismo. Atong sabton og maayo:

------------
Section 2. First paragraph: “…respect for life in conformity with internationally recognized human rights standards.”
–> Why not in conformity with the Philippine standards? Why international? Do we need to follow other countries way of population control and reproductive health? Or are we enslaved by the first world countries? Filipinos are known of good and kind people like being hospitable, which other countries are seeking to learn. We have our own standards. We are known for our colonial mentality.



------------
Section 2. Third paragraph: “…sustainable human development is better assured with a manageable population of healthy, educated and productive citizens.”
–> This statement promotes euthanasia, divorce, etc. There shall be an unequal distribution of wealth.



------------
Section 3. (a): “In the promotion of reproductive health, there should be no bias for either modern of natural methods of family planning;”
–> Nothing in this bill that promotes the natural family planning.


------------
Section 3. (e): “The limited resources of the country cannot be suffered to be spread so thinly to service a burgeoning multitude that makes the allocations grossly inadequate and effectively meaningless.”
–> This leads to more money for the rich and lesser money for the poor!


------------
Section 3. (f): “Freedom of informed choice, which is…”
–> The definition of "informed choice" is not clear to everyone. What is meant by informed choice? Does it mean everyone is free to watch x-rated films? How about the kids? How about a demonstration in class?


------------
Section 3. (g): “While the number and spacing of children are left to the sound judgement of parents and couples based on their personal conviction and religious beliefs…”
–> This statement is contradicted by Section 10.



------------
Continued: “…such concerned parents and couples, INCLUDING UNMARRIED INDIVIDUALS, should be granted…”
–> This includes minors, and lovers not capable of being a parent. This promotes pre-marital ***, non-marital ***, abortion, promiscuity, fornication, incest, etc.


------------
Continued: “…and should be guided by qualified State workers and professional private practitioners;”
–> Why are church leaders not included? Why do priests, bishops, nuns, etc not involves? Does this mean they have no knowledge on such matters?



------------
Section 3. (j): “Development…that seek to uplift the quality of life of the people, more particularly the poor, the needy and the marginalized;”
–> What assurance will the poor benefits? Not clear.



------------
Section 3. (l): “Respect for, PROTECTION and FULFILLMENT of REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH RIGHTS…not only the rights and welfare of adult individuals and couples BUT THOSE OF ADOLESCENTS’ AND CHILDREN’S AS WELL;…”
–> What reproductive health rights for the adolescents and children? Children are included, whose mind are not yet mature enough! This may promote a dirty knowledge about this to the children. Parents will be responsible for this.


------------
Section 3. (m): “…as abortion remains a crime and is punishable, the government shall ensure the women seeking care for POST-ABORTION COMPLICATIONS shall be treated…and compassionate manner.”
–> This is again contradicted in Section 10. Post-abortion complications in this statement is only an admission that abortion really has complications. This statement promotes abortion.



------------
Section 4. “Definition of Terms”
–> Defining the common understanding of everyone does not need to be defined.


------------
Section 4. (b): “…which enables couples and INDIVIDUALS to decide freely and responsibly the NUMBER and SPACING OF THEIR CHILDREN…”
–> “Individuals.” Does this mean that unmarried couples have the right to have children?


------------
Section 4. (c): “Reproductive Health – refers to the state of physical, mental and social well-being…”
–> Why spiritual and moral well-being not included here?


------------
Continued: “This implies that PEOPLE are able to have a SATISFYING and SAFE *** LIFE, that they have the CAPABILITY TO REPRODUCE and the freedom to DECIDE if, WHEN AND HOW OFTEN TO DO SO, provided that these are not against the law.”
–> Take note of the phrases that are in UPPERCASE. People that can be satisfied includes the youth, unmarried, homosexual, etc. And, they may decide when and how often to do so? How about teenagers doing it every minute on the grassland? It is not against the law as long as no one saw them.


------------
Section 4. (d): “Reproductive Health Rights – refers to the rights of INDIVIDUALS and couples to DECIDE FREELY AND RESPONSIBLY the number, spacing and timing of their children.”
–> Again, the ‘individual’ word. Does this bill really promotes population control in which I can decide freely and responsibly the number of children? Suppose I receive great pay, I can raise about 15 children. What a population control.



------------
Section 4. (g): “10. Male involvement and participation in reproductive health.”
–> How will I be involved and participate with reproductive health? Isn’t it obvious that this refers to *** among individuals including children? Take note that on Section 4 (c) doesn’t include the spiritual well-being.


------------
Section 4. (h): “…relevant information on all matters relating to the reproductive system its functions and processes and human sexuality…”
–> This may promote promiscuity in education.


------------
Continued: “…developing NECESSARY SKILLS to be able to distinguish between facts and myths on *** and sexuality…”
–> How? Doing actual sexual intercourse in class? What necessary skills? Does it mean the techniques, the positions and the likes? Does it mean the class will have a film showing on pornographic films?


------------
Section 10: “Contraceptives as ESSENTIAL MEDICINES – hormonal contraceptives, intrauterine devices, injectables and other allied reproductive health products…shall be considered under the category of ESSENTIAL MEDICINES…”
–> This is the most interesting part. Contraceptives are now considered as ESSENTIAL MEDICINES–not only an ordinary medicine but an ESSENTIAL medicine. We can buy condoms the same way we buy Biogesic. Teenagers can buy those too at an affordable price. Better advertise it so that small children will learn too and if possible imitate it through experiments and practice for better reproductive health learning and to master the NECESSARY SKILLS as depicted in Section 4, h.


------------
Section 12. (g): “Abstinence before marriage”
–> How can this be promoted when the unmarried are allowed to have *** and reproduce (See Section 4)?


------------
Sections 22 – 27:
–> If this bill becomes a law, the few people have nothing more to say.

[cywizard]

I am pro to RH bill and should I say there are loopholes that needs to be reviewed and revised....