CEBU-WIDE ECOZONE: What do you think?

[RMK711]

---

As I said maam, he or she who makes the first allegation, has the burden of proving the allegation. Your claim, that mas dili ta ka afford og balay kung mapasa ni nga bill.. asa imong proof maam. Gahulat ko..

[masakiton]

As I said maam, he or she who makes the first allegation, has the burden of proving the allegation. Your claim, that mas dili ta ka afford og balay kung mapasa ni nga bill.. asa imong proof maam. Gahulat ko..

wala ko proof kai poor ako analysis

maam kasabot ka sa termino nga gigamit nimo.. ingon ka "maka afford na dayon" doesn't that mean "I can afford right away, as in instantly" sorry ha kung sayop akong translation.. pero wurag sakto man na. Ni ingon ka nga niingon ko "maka afford na dayon" inya imong ebidensya kay niingon ko "I see no evidence nga fewer people can afford.

Is it not correct nga ang statement "maka afford na dayon" is not equivalent to "I see no evidence nga fewer people can afford." As I said maam, you need to know what you are talking about before talking. Niclaim man kaha ka (aw si Tommy Osmena diay) nga mas dili maka afford ang mga tao kung mapasa ang bill.. so asa man imong proof? Katong mga calculation 2x nimo? Hahaha...

oki.. so kung ma himo na ug RA ning bill...naa ta trabaho ... then dili lang gihapon ta maka afford ug house and lot... ngano ato a mani suporta an?

[RMK711]

Kung wala kay proof.. ayaw nalang allege. Kung wala kay proof.. tapos na ang discussion. case closed na haha =P balik lang ko kung maka-substantiate na ka sa imong claim arun lingaw. =)

[masakiton]

Kung wala kay proof.. ayaw nalang allege. Kung wala kay proof.. tapos na ang discussion. case closed na haha =P balik lang ko kung maka-substantiate na ka sa imong claim arun lingaw. =)

hehehehe
ikaw.. sir.. naa ka proof nga

I don't see any evidence that fewer people will be able to afford a house

maam kasabot ka sa termino nga gigamit nimo.. ingon ka "maka afford na dayon" doesn't that mean "I can afford right away, as in instantly" sorry ha kung sayop akong translation.. pero wurag sakto man na. Ni ingon ka nga niingon ko "maka afford na dayon" inya imong ebidensya kay niingon ko "I see no evidence nga fewer people can afford.

Is it not correct nga ang statement "maka afford na dayon" is not equivalent to "I see no evidence nga fewer people can afford." As I said maam, you need to know what you are talking about before talking. Niclaim man kaha ka (aw si Tommy Osmena diay) nga mas dili maka afford ang mga tao kung mapasa ang bill.. so asa man imong proof? Katong mga calculation 2x nimo? Hahaha...

oki.. so kung ma himo na ug RA ning bill...naa ta trabaho ... then dili lang gihapon ta maka afford ug house and lot... ngano ato a mani suporta an?

[masakiton]

Your claim, that mas dili ta ka afford og balay kung mapasa ni nga bill.. asa imong proof maam. Gahulat ko..

Kung wala kay proof.. ayaw nalang allege. Kung wala kay proof.. tapos na ang discussion. case closed na haha =P balik lang ko kung maka-substantiate na ka sa imong claim arun lingaw. =)

Chamber to retool Cebu ecozone bill - INQUIRER.net, Philippine News for Filipinos

He said the trend of urban migration would worsen as people flock to the city for jobs, increasing the urban poor population and need for services.

Do you know the Law of Supply and Demand Sir?

[RMK711]

Chamber to retool Cebu ecozone bill - INQUIRER.net, Philippine News for Filipinos

He said the trend of urban migration would worsen as people flock to the city for jobs, increasing the urban poor population and need for services.

Can you prove that people will flock to the city?

Isn't the bill going to apply to the entire province, eg. the tax break will apply to the whole province and not just the city of Cebu?

This doesn't prove anything, by the way. A claim is not equal to proof...

[masakiton]

Can you prove that people will flock to the city?
Isn't the bill going to apply to the entire province, eg. the tax break will apply to the whole province and not just the city of Cebu?
This doesn't prove anything, by the way. A claim is not equal to proof...

wala tingali naka suwat nga cebu city sa ako gi post
diba ang cebu island kai daghan mga city
proof.. singapore... ang mga taw sa silingan nga nasud nang larga padung singapore para maka kita ug trabaho
nya karon ang property market na himo na issue kai cge na ug saka ang prisyo

I don't see any evidence that fewer people will be able to afford a house

maam kasabot ka sa termino nga gigamit nimo.. ingon ka "maka afford na dayon" doesn't that mean "I can afford right away, as in instantly" sorry ha kung sayop akong translation.. pero wurag sakto man na. Ni ingon ka nga niingon ko "maka afford na dayon" inya imong ebidensya kay niingon ko "I see no evidence nga fewer people can afford.

Is it not correct nga ang statement "maka afford na dayon" is not equivalent to "I see no evidence nga fewer people can afford." As I said maam, you need to know what you are talking about before talking. Niclaim man kaha ka (aw si Tommy Osmena diay) nga mas dili maka afford ang mga tao kung mapasa ang bill.. so asa man imong proof? Katong mga calculation 2x nimo? Hahaha...

oki.. so kung ma himo na ug RA ning bill...naa ta trabaho ... then dili lang gihapon ta maka afford ug house and lot... ngano ato a mani suporta an?

[RMK711]

wala tingali naka suwat nga cebu city sa ako gi post
diba ang cebu island kai daghan mga city
proof.. singapore... ang mga taw sa silingan nga nasud nang larga padung singapore para maka kita ug trabaho
nya karon ang property market na himo na issue kai cge na ug saka ang prisyo

Aw pareha ra gihapon. Can you prove that people will flock to the city? Cebu wide man ni, so it will include also areas that are not in cities right?

Saka ang presyo, wow.. so unsa man imong point maam. Nga naay inflation?

Is it possible to have economic growth without inflation maam?

oki.. so kung ma himo na ug RA ning bill...naa ta trabaho ... then dili lang gihapon ta maka afford ug house and lot... ngano ato a mani suporta an?

Asa man imong proof maam nga dili ta ka afford. Di ba naghulat pa ko sa imong proof? "he who makes the first allegation must prove it first"

[masakiton]

Aw pareha ra gihapon. Can you prove that people will flock to the city? Cebu wide man ni, so it will include also areas that are not in cities right?

Once realized, this would spur economic development not only in Cebu but also our neighboring provinces.

Normal ni sa economically developed nga lugar. But we can always afford kay job is everywhere. Mosaka na sad ang rate sa sweldo.

Saka ang presyo, wow.. so unsa man imong point maam. Nga naay inflation?

Do you know the Law of Supply and Demand Sir?

Is it possible to have economic growth without inflation maam?

wala ko kahibaw


Asa man imong proof sir nga maka afford. Di ba naghulat pa ko sa imong proof?

[RMK711]

wala ko kahibaw


Asa man imong proof sir nga maka afford. Di ba naghulat pa ko sa imong proof?

Kung si BIGMAN nag hisgot, si BIGMAN ang pamutan-a. Dili ako. Kai dili man ko si bigman.

"He or she who makes the first allegation, must prove it"

By the way, I never claimed that everyone will be able to afford right away (as you claimed).. in fact i said almost the opposite, that not everyone can afford but that this is a reality and this bill never claimed to give jobs to everyone anyway right? If you are saying, a bill must be able to get everyone who has a job, regardless of the job, a house in order to be worthwhile as a bill.. then we should not pass any bills at all because no bill anywhere in the world can do that. Even in first world countries, there are people who can't afford their own houses. Does that mean we shouldn't try to become a first world country?

Kanang mga jobless, o minimum wage earner, can they afford under the present system? But I think the minimum wage earner in Singapore can afford their own HLURB flat, unless you can prove otherwise. Regardless of your claim that the government offers subsidies, that's irrelevant because those subsidies ultimately come from the citizens anyway. Superannuation by the way is known as enforced retirement allocation, it is maybe because you confused it with the useless deductions like SSS/PagIbig here that you mentioned that in a negative light before.