CEBU-WIDE ECOZONE: What do you think?

[masakiton]

---

Hahaha no, maam that just shows how clueless you are to how these statistics are compiled. Even in the U.S. they do not count jobless people who no longer register that they are actively seeking work. They only count those who declare that they are jobless and seeking a job. Figure out first how the stats are compiled. A 7.5% unemployment rate is pretty high for a developing country. The unemployment rate in SG / HK is around 2-3%. So what's your point again?

So what's your point again? link please

[RMK711]

So what's your point again? link please

The point is pretty clear isn't it or am I responding to a non-high school grad? Wiki it madam.. don't be lazy

[masakiton]

How does that fit with your position on the Cebu Ecozone, if you even have one.

more jobs but mas daghan sad ang mo mahal labi na ang cost of living..like f ma pareha jud sa hong kong ang cebu, sus pla na kaha ang price sa mga house & lots..even house rental mo mahal jud..haysss

Chamber to retool Cebu ecozone bill - INQUIRER.net, Philippine News for Filipinos

Osmeña said he would not support the bill because the local governments in Cebu would lose tax revenues and effective control over their localities since the economic zone would be mainly in the hands of the private sector.

“No taxes paid and that's the nice part, only that you wake up one morning realizing that nobody is collecting your garbage. How can we do that if the local government doesn't earn any revenue? “ he said.

He said the trend of urban migration would worsen as people flock to the city for jobs, increasing the urban poor population and need for services.

Supporters of the bill said declaring Cebu an ecozone would attract foreign investments,especial foreign locators who would enjoy tax holidays and other incentives in a special economic zone.

[masakiton]

The point is pretty clear isn't it or am I responding to a non-high school grad? Wiki it madam.. don't be lazy

makasabot man ko kung wala kai reference

[RMK711]

I'm feeling generous so I'll post it for you:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unemployment

"As defined by the International Labour Organization, "unemployed workers" are those who are currently not working but are willing and able to work for pay, currently available to work, and have actively searched for work.[54] Individuals who are actively seeking job placement must make the effort to: be in contact with an employer, have job interviews, contact job placement agencies, send out resumes, submit applications, respond to advertisements, or some other means of active job searching within the prior four weeks. Simply looking at advertisements and not responding will not count as actively seeking job placement. Since not all unemployment may be "open" and counted by government agencies, official statistics on unemployment may not be accurate.[55]"

Next time maam ayaw pag tinapulan.. gamit lang search sa google ha? kahibalo man kaha ka mogamit internet...

[RMK711]

Chamber to retool Cebu ecozone bill - INQUIRER.net, Philippine News for Filipinos

Osmeña said he would not support the bill because the local governments in Cebu would lose tax revenues and effective control over their localities since the economic zone would be mainly in the hands of the private sector.

“No taxes paid and that's the nice part, only that you wake up one morning realizing that nobody is collecting your garbage. How can we do that if the local government doesn't earn any revenue? “ he said.

He said the trend of urban migration would worsen as people flock to the city for jobs, increasing the urban poor population and need for services.

Supporters of the bill said declaring Cebu an ecozone would attract foreign investments,especial foreign locators who would enjoy tax holidays and other incentives in a special economic zone.

Yes I know that's Osmena's position. But I want to hear in your own words, so I'm sure you understand, what your opinion is. Unless you are Tommy Osmena posting as a female on istorya hahaha...

[masakiton]

I'm feeling generous so I'll post it for you:

Unemployment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"As defined by the International Labour Organization, "unemployed workers" are those who are currently not working but are willing and able to work for pay, currently available to work, and have actively searched for work.[54] Individuals who are actively seeking job placement must make the effort to: be in contact with an employer, have job interviews, contact job placement agencies, send out resumes, submit applications, respond to advertisements, or some other means of active job searching within the prior four weeks. Simply looking at advertisements and not responding will not count as actively seeking job placement. Since not all unemployment may be "open" and counted by government agencies, official statistics on unemployment may not be accurate.[55]"

Next time maam ayaw pag tinapulan.. gamit lang search sa google ha? kahibalo man kaha ka mogamit internet...

thanks

sa kini asa man?

Even in the U.S. they do not count jobless people who no longer register that they are actively seeking work.

[masakiton]

Yes I know that's Osmena's position. But I want to hear in your own words, so I'm sure you understand, what your opinion is. Unless you are Tommy Osmena posting as a female on istorya hahaha...

we(tomas) have the same position

[RMK711]

thanks

sa kini asa man?

Google is your friend maam. Dili ko secretary nimo haha. Basig unemployed ka ha..

[masakiton]

Even in the U.S. they do not count jobless people who no longer register that they are actively seeking work.

Google is your friend maam. Dili ko secretary nimo haha. Basig unemployed ka ha..

hehehe dili man ko computer/internet savvy .. wala pud koi nakit an. maka sabot raman ko kung walai proof nga maka back up