
Originally Posted by
FranZeno
^^m.post na sad unta ko ana regarding the title.
If you wanted a discussion in the first place, you should have put a neutral thread title, because you don't know what's the other forumers' stand on this, you just can't barge in and shout "boycott!", right? Of course, kontrahon jd na, who would want to symphatize with someone who is against a law for safety, and one more thing, try to post more on your opening statement and explain thoroughly why you boycott it, and from your opening posts, I don't think those were reasons enough to boycott this law. 4500 is reasonable enough to draw a thick line between life and death.
Still, wala man gihapon kay dag.anan ani, kay the sole purpose of this law is not only for your safety but also for others. Like sa isa na nagpost dri, your freedom to choose/freewill ends when you violate others' right to live (or safety), ie. You can always choose to fire a gun, wala man nagpugong nimo na ayaw, you can even fire it to yourself, there's no problem with that. But it can also kill others that's why there is a law for that. You can always choose not to wear a helmet, pwede nimo ibangga imo motor sa pader, you can always do that, but if mamatay ka what happens to your family? That's why there is a law for that, the Helmet Law, to draw a thick line between life and death.