Kasi natulog na ako.
You guys are blowing up the topic to something larger than the original context. The trick is, STICK to the topic, and in the topic title, I can clearly see that we're NOT comparing the Philippines, to South Korea, Japan, or Taiwan--we're comparing the Philippines to
Libya and
Dubai. So (stretching my fingers), again, what do Libya and UAE have, that the Philippines doesn't have (and to those who pointed this out, yes, we do have oil but we don't have the necessary infrastructure--both political and physical--to harness it)?
If you guys really want to discuss the problems of the Philippines in earnest, and compare it with such countries as China, South Korea, Japan and Taiwan, then why not start a thread saying:
if china, taiwan, japan, sokor was able to do it, why can't we?
In that kind of a thread, most of what you have said in this thread might actually hold water and I'll have to agree to your points. But again, hindi eh--this thread has a DIFFERENT point.
I rest my case.
Ang hirap makipag-usap sa duling kasi akala nya dalawang tao ang kausap nya.
Yet another individual that strays from the topic title. Let's take a rather rough analogy shall we?
If gi-lay off ang usa ka maid kay nagkipag-talik sa iyang amo (and nasuko si Dona mao nga gi-fire/gi-sibak si Inday), it doesn't necessary imply nga wala nay ma-sweldo ang mga amo nya sa iyaha.
Pardon me for using such a rough analogy, pero it seems by your remark na ganyan na lang ka simple ang mundo (i.e. wala nang oil, pauwiin na ang mga Filipino), when in fact the inherent complexities of the world markets and how they affect each other could be a better reason why Filipinos from Dubai were laid off.
Again, alisin ang kitid. Kaya lang naman ako arrogant kasi maraming makitid.
-RODION