Kinsa jud imo gituohan kung diin jud tah gikan, ang Bible or Science?

[krizitoyness]

ani ay..

lets go out.. ad2 tag.. lets say.. colon.! crossing jud sa may metro..

kita ka did2g 40+ yr old man, holding a bible, and preaching about jesus, genesis, proverbs, blah blah blah..

now, balhin tag carbon.. KITA MUG ATHEISTS PREACHER NGAD2.?!

WALA.!
NGANU MN.?!

cause atheists aint COOCOO..

GGGGGGGGG.?


peace yall.. am on the neutral side WITH BRAINS..

[WesBorland]

i believe in god but the thing is science has more evidence than bible.

[treize]

wahahaha, how about you ask it to yourself. Do you really need to have a bible to believe in GOD?
When and How did you know you have a GOD? Pre-historic people told you? wahahaha.

Pre-historic people such as Neanderthals believe in a GOD? wahahaha, please i would love to see evidence for this.

usa naka sa candidate para mental hospital.

is there any sensible statement that you can share? lol, oh please stop fooling yourself..
evidence of God's existence? The evidence is everywhere you're just too dumb to see it..
saon og magkalisod nampit dayon og ginoo... ayawg buanga imong kaulingon doh..

let me tell you something and hopefully you can get the point this time..

A person murdered someone and he carefully make sure that no evidence that can trace back to him.. and so a Trial was made and this person was proven innocent... even though that person was proven innocent that doesn't change the fact that he did the crime..

An innocent person proven guilty to a crime he did not commit, since all the evidence were pointing to him so he was proven guilty of the crime... but that doesn't change the fact that he is innocent...

now, still not getting the point? or do I need to explain further until your puny little brain can catch it?

[schmuck]

is there any sensible statement that you can share? lol, oh please stop fooling yourself..
evidence of God's existence? The evidence is everywhere you're just dumb to see it..
saon og magkalisod nampit dayon og ginoo... ayawg buanga imong kaulingon doh..

let me tell you something and hopefully you can get the point this time..

A person murdered someone and he carefully make sure that no evidence that can trace back to him.. and so a Trial was made and this person was proven innocent... even though that person was proven innocent that doesn't change the fact that he did the crime..

An innocent person proven guilty to a crime he did not commit, since all the evidence were pointing to him so he was proven guilty of the crime... but that doesn't change the fact that he is innocent...

now, still not getting the point? or do I need to explain further until your puny little brain can catch it?

Lets replace killer with god here.
Let's see, between there is "evidence" of god BUT there is no god, and there is a god but there is no evidence to prove it. I don't see how your analogy helps your case either ?_?

[orcgod]

is there any sensible statement that you can share? lol, oh please stop fooling yourself..
evidence of God's existence? The evidence is everywhere you're just dumb to see it..
saon og magkalisod nampit dayon og ginoo... ayawg buanga imong kaulingon doh..

let me tell you something and hopefully you can get the point this time..

A person murdered someone and he carefully make sure that no evidence that can trace back to him.. and so a Trial was made and this person was proven innocent... even though that person was proven innocent that doesn't change the fact that he did the crime..

An innocent person proven guilty to a crime he did not commit, since all the evidence were pointing to him so he was proven guilty of the crime... but that doesn't change the fact that he is innocent...

now, still not getting the point? or do I need to explain further until your puny little brain can catch it?

Tubaga sa akong pangutana, kay murag padulong naka mental hospital. nya tubagon nako ni imong reply after mutubag ka sa akong earlier question. ok Mr. Brainless? Mr. brainless ako tawag nimo ha, kay di man ka mutoo ug Cat-Scan, wahahaha, Dog-Scan man imo.

let me remind you what you posted earlier;

"Originally Posted by treize View Post
try searching my posts, never did I mentioned about rosary... taka lang kag panagat da...

once again your logic is seriously flawed...
do you really need to have a bible to believe in God?
before the paper was invented, prehistoric people believe in God and they don't have bible...

hehehe.. you never cease to amaze me..."


When and How did you know you have a GOD?

Pre-historic people such as Neanderthals believe in a GOD?

tubaga sa na, ayaw likay, wakay matubag nu? kay galibog naka? wahahahaha! hala, hala, hala, nagka iti na!!!!!

[Hotmomma]

saon og magkalisod nampit dayon og ginoo...

kasagaran lagi ninyo mo ingon ani "ug magkalisod..."

ug naa sad mahitabo ninyo dayun i blame ang ginoo. ngano man na?

[SioDenz]

i believe in god but the thing is science has more evidence than bible.

bible has more evidence pero wala palan nahitabo.

[orcgod]

bible has more evidence pero wala palan nahitabo.

like what kind of evidence sir? curious lang ko.

[kenites]

bible has more evidence pero wala palan nahitabo.

Evidence nga wala pa nahitabo? naa diay ana?
Like unsa man pud nga mga evidence bro?

[cobraKing]

unsa mana na evidence??