Aquino apologizes for Cabinet men’s behavior

[em_b]

your post is about response #3 (pildi imo manok sa election??)... but as i said you cant use that argument on me cause i did not vote for anybody.. why would i be a sour loser?? sa uban posters you can use that reply but not on me (pls read my post earlier).. mas objective ko kaysa uban nga tawo diri, i'll give credit to where credit is due.. kanang mga artista sa senate nga gi saway sa uban nga tawo.. i'll give it to them na effective sila kay naa silay nahimo as legislators.. look at tito sotto, kusug gyud ang iya campaign against drugs.. so i'll give it to them na maski 'artista lang sila' ,naa silay nahimo...

first, you didn't vote for any candidate and yet you wax too much about us not voting wisely, or those voting for noynoy me included. but atleast everyone of us exercise our right to choose, win or loose, we stand behind the candidate or what the candidates stood for. but then again, election is over. so it shouldn't matter.
second, i read your post earlier, but with due respect, i can reply whatever i want, whenever i want, to whoever i want so long as it is with decency, with respect. i think it is downright arrogance to generalize and classify people accourding to your 1,2,3's.
third, i never knew objectivity is now synonymous to close mindedness. you claimed to be objective yet you are so judgmental.
fourth, you give credit where credit is due. korek. no ones questioning you about that. but not giving credits is different from criticizing. and even critics are good. it just depend on how you say it, how you deliver it, the thought and the basis. i think you might have the thought but fail on the rest.

[Pi2plank]

and why would leo attack serge if leo is a critic of gloria? i dont see any logic there...

serge was employed by gloria, but he had the respect of his fellow media comrades.. cause whatever job he had, he'd done it right... if only noynoy's people had a better way of handling the media, then i dont see any reason for people to criticize them, even if they hate noynoy...

[cebulifer]

PNoy needs a good press secretary!

[samamar21]

wala pa lang maanad!!

[Pi2plank]

first, you didn't vote for any candidate and yet you wax too much about us not voting wisely, or those voting for noynoy me included. but atleast everyone of us exercise our right to choose, win or loose, we stand behind the candidate or what the candidates stood for. but then again, election is over. so it shouldn't matter.
second, i read your post earlier, but with due respect, i can reply whatever i want, whenever i want, to whoever i want so long as it is with decency, with respect. i think it is downright arrogance to generalize and classify people accourding to your 1,2,3's.
third, i never knew objectivity is now synonymous to close mindedness. you claimed to be objective yet you are so judgmental.
fourth, you give credit where credit is due. korek. no ones questioning you about that. but not giving credits is different from criticizing. and even critics are good. it just depend on how you say it, how you deliver it, the thought and the basis. i think you might have the thought but fail on the rest.

1st kanang line na 'pildi imo manok', i dont mean that to anybody nga ni vote for whoever candidate.. i'm referring that sa mga posters dri na mao daun ang argument nila pra sa wala ni vote for noynoy.. e.g. naay issue(thread starts), & then naay arguments mo gawas (post & then a lot of replies), & then instead nga naay constructive answers, ang mga pro-noynoy mo sulti dayon sa line 'pildi imo manok' mao na cya.. wla ko ni refer sa imoha kung pildi ba imo manok or dili.. i'm referring here to the most used replies pra sa mga pro-noynoy.. kung naay argument mao ray ma answer nila.. number 1,2,or 3 or naa sad number (4.) hater ka.. etc..

tan-awa kuno ang uban threads kang noynoy.. kay mao ray pattern.. ang mga pro-noynoy, mo end up sa 1,2,or 3 instead nga mag answer sa issue.. unya ang mga anti-noynoy, mo abot sa name calling.. abnoy, na opaw na cya etc.... ang maau ani matubag unta ang mga issue w/o hate & w/ objectivity, intelligent discussion ba.. dili kay personalan.. mao na ako pasabot

[reypel]

serge was employed by gloria, but he had the respect of his fellow media comrades.. cause whatever job he had, he'd done it right... if only noynoy's people had a better way of handling the media, then i dont see any reason for people to criticize them, even if they hate noynoy...

therefore its not because of who the president is...naa ra gyud na sa performance sa usa ka tao...if they did a msitake then they deserve to corrected wether whos admin they are appointed

[Pi2plank]

therefore its not because of who the president is...naa ra gyud na sa performance sa usa ka tao...if they did a msitake then they deserve to corrected wether whos admin they are appointed

korek ..

[em_b]

in fairness to noynoy, he didnt promise us a bed of roses. nor did he promise to make us economic giants on his term. he was clear on one thing, fight corruption. just like her mother, she was president for a purpose. with main purpose to make, ammend and strengthen the constitution. she did. she served her purpose.

i for one believe in the sincerity of noy. i want someone who can clean the system first. gloria and her peeps are busy fixing the system by trying to replace it. its not broken, why should we replace it? the problem is we werent able to maximize it because there are lot of people taking advantage from the inside. this is whats need to be done. clean the system so it can function well. noy, may not be as intelligent as Gibo. he might not have the political will as Gordon. nor has the economic brilliance of villar. but he has the sincerity and purity of intentions. if we are talking of corruptions, he is the only one capable of cleaning the system. would you believe if villar will say the line "hindi ako magnanakaw"? i dont think so.

i can say noy is successful if he will be able to deliver his promise, stop corruption. it will be the task of the next president to bring us to economic power.

[reypel]

if i may summarise what his promises are,that is to run after the previous administration...ako lng mkuyawan ani ni noy2 coause it might back fire at him...but on the otherhand allegations of the previous adminstration should also be investigated to prove guilt or innocense on the party involved...pra sad mstop na ang haka2 about those allegations...

on Stopping the corruption issue,he may start his measures regarding such but totally eradicating corruption in our country it like praying for a miracle...i may be optimistic but in reality murag lisod gyud kau...

[tikud]

NO worry Gentlemen PNOy has 5 years and 10 months more to prove himself..... kana lang akoa.