ganahn kaayo ko sa gisulti ni teddy boy..
"You sons of bitches! You had us standing here guaranteeing to the public and the world that even if fraud is committed, we would be able to trace it. We never said that fraud could never be committed, but you said we could trace it. But now, you tell me that at 10 in the evening, you could do it [cheat] and we would never know?" Locsin, chairman of the House committee on electoral reforms and suffrage, told Heider Garcia of Smartmatic.
manual count ang next baraagy election... ang mga pcos machine kay ibalik sa smatmatic.. nihuwam ra man gud ta...![]()
murag gubot gyud na styla...mao gni gbuhatan ug ballot secrecy folder nga wla mgamit tunogd ana...lisod gyud na labi naa ka botar sa election hot spot like sa amoa sa bogo...unsaon nlng kng mkita ang imu pgbotar...
Only if you know how the entire system works. You must have enough knowledge to every library and executable files that these machines have.
In general, you can write backdoor applications if you have depth knowledge of the blue prints of these machines and pin point the security loopholes. W/c in our case, no one has received nor reviewed the source code except for Locsin, Melo, and its smartmatic counterpart. Granted that these three never disclosed these information to someone.
that news is the most bullshit i had ever saw. i could shot the head of the whistleblower. dili intawon ingon ana ka bogo ang IT pepz diri sa pinas sad oi. i thing to know if there is fraud is to check directly the source code. PPCRV also runs manual count vs data transmitted directly from the PCOS machine, naa gamay discrepancy pero not that muabot ug 5M shaded votes. how would they explain that the CoC - hard copy are tallied vs transmitted data, dha palang daan patay na ang whistle blower. dam* it....![]()
In my opinion, the source code is defective. Remember that after the PCOS machines were distributed around the country, and tested whether they are functioning well, the machines failed to count votes for local candidates and some votes where not recorded by the machine. That alone tells us that the source code is defective.
In my computer system class way back in college, the source code (e.g. assembly codes, the language was used at that time) is embedded permanently in the ROM (read-only-memory), in order to fix the program, the ROM has to uploaded with the reconfigure program.
Now, what happen is the CF cards, which contains nothing but empty space, where removed and replaced with another one -- contains a program that fix the glitch -- instead of changing the ROM with a reconfigured program.
My question is what program was rigged into the CF cards? That is the thing that I want to know.
dali ra pag hack ani... kung ang naghack ang gabuhat rapud sa system na team hahaha (joke) ^^
Similar Threads |
|