
Originally Posted by
cryptkpr
nobody is saying that your love for your country is measured by the number of bills you have passed but rather what you have actually done and what more you want to do for your country. that, my friend, is where your candidate has failed miserably.
if a person has not passed a single bill as a senator, then he has failed as a senator. here is an excerpt from noynoy's bio in the senate website:
"He felt that there were already too many laws, and good ones at that, but they seemingly lacked proper implementation. He concentrated on crafting laws that would help create opportunity rather than impose additional burdens to those who are already disadvantaged."
Senator Benigno S. Aquino III - Senate of the Philippines
if he feels that there are already too many laws, then why on earth did he run for congress and senate?! if he felt that the implementation of these laws was the problem, he should have run for mayor or governor in tarlac. the executive branch implements the laws formulated by the legislative branch! the problem with most of us is that we do not understand the difference between these two branches.
if he actually crafted these laws to create opportunity blah blah blah, he should have had these laws implemented. otherwise, these laws are useless. and if you're saying, 'dili lalim ang pagpasar ug law', then why have other people done it? being from the opposition is not an excuse why you are not able to pass any laws. take gilbert remulla for example. he has been in the opposition since gloria was in place. did that ever prevent him from passing laws in the congress? a resounding NO.
Sir, sakto ka. Dili man gud na interesting paminawon sa tao. Mao na dili nila gusto masabtan ang balaod, ang government structure, and whatsoever about the government.
On-topic kato sad kang Bayani interview, ipilit jud nila ni Ces nga 'hot-tempered' si Gordon kang Bayani. But Bayani answered it well.