dili man cguro... naha lang ang own nga dli samok mao bae lang ilaha pili-on.
dili man cguro... naha lang ang own nga dli samok mao bae lang ilaha pili-on.
Instead of talking about discrimination, why not talk about the existing situations within the boarding house which may have prompted who can and who cannot be accepted as lodgers?
The first step you need to make is to determine what made the owner prefer female over male lodgers.
Well, of course, you won't waste your time investigating anymore once you see the sign.
But if indeed you had taken a step further to investigate, you will find that most lodging houses who put these "Wanted Lady Lodgers" signs are occupied by a family with one or two vacant rooms. Meaning, there's a possibility that the owners who live there had a daughter. Either it's a little girl or a teenager. How slim are the chances that the owners would look for a male lodger?
Another possibility is that the first lodger who arrived and rented the other room was a female. We can't expect the sign to read "Accepts Male Lodgers".
There are many reasons why only female boarders are accepted.
The bottom line is that in situations where there's a valid and logical reason, you cannot call it discrimination.
That's what you call preference.
.
The way I see it. Mas naay dicipline ang lady / woman na mo rent. They pay rent on time , much Cleaner , Neater and less ang chance's mag dala og lain sa room. " Again this is my opinion"
Well explained bro... but this scenario did not limit to boys only but also to thos couples that needs to b n one room or place... they were affected as well sa ani nga preference... well i agree if you're the owner you'll have all the discretion to choose but we cannot deny the fact that in this situation we are generalizing males to be a not so good preference - that is the discrimination..
Similar Threads |
|