fingolfin is abusive...

[lstorya]

ummmm,im not biased and i dont know any of you,but when i look at the posts at the top which includes the quotes of the two parties,i would have to agree that fingolfin is correct.he never attacked the poster,only the post (Note:"but then again how can you have understanding when all you do is read other people's work and spend zero time burning your own lamp", thats where you made your mistake Jude,thats the first insult i have seen since the begginning of the discussion). And right after that,youve been insulting everyone...which kinda sucks and made me wonder why you would post this complaint at all in the first place and your goal was expose fingolfin as being abusive,which now clearly shows that its you. Also made me wonder why other people started posting that this is about the discussion between beliefs,which in my opinion clearly isnt since the title of the thread is about fingolfin being abusive.

[miyay]

kay ngano lagi ni-enter sa S&O na zoo to ngadto.

i think butangan unta og warning sa S&O na: enter at your own risk

[KASAAC]

...so that's what happened, gessshhhhhhhhh

[KE-25]

Jude, relax lang .... there is always a solution to a problem if people truly want to get it fixed, and yes there are ways to say things to prove a point, share opinions and views without sounding on the edge.

Honestly, maybe you didn't mean to be straight forward but reading your response after first quote of Fin was a little to straight , you shouldn't have said right off the bat " study the whole bible " so on .... at times without knowing everyone may say things out of character, thats why we are human.

Heck Religious debates are tough to begin with ... so I say , lets call it a night and look at this as an experience ... seriously the stress isn't worth it

I'm sure both of you meant well ...

my 2 cents

[Bisayang_manok]

ummmm,im not biased and i dont know any of you,but when i look at the posts at the top which includes the quotes of the two parties,i would have to agree that fingolfin is correct.he never attacked the poster,only the post (Note:"but then again how can you have understanding when all you do is read other people's work and spend zero time burning your own lamp", thats where you made your mistake Jude,thats the first insult i have seen since the begginning of the discussion). And right after that,youve been insulting everyone...which kinda sucks and made me wonder why you would post this complaint at all in the first place and your goal was expose fingolfin as being abusive,which now clearly shows that its you. Also made me wonder why other people started posting that this is about the discussion between beliefs,which in my opinion clearly isnt since the title of the thread is about fingolfin being abusive.

let me add something to set the balance. I don't find JUDE's statement offensive. He was only telling the truth. When he said this but then again how can you have understanding when all you do is read other people's work and spend zero time burning your own lamp"- he wasn't insulting fingolfin, the way I see it, he was airing what he thinks about the guy.

now calling somebody's God crazy that's insulting. There is no other way to see it. when I call someone's God crazy what im actually doing is im showing my disrespect to other people's faith w/c is contrary to the rules posed in the S&O forum.

to fingolfin ayaw kasuko sir ha, you should tone down. choose your word carefully sir nga dili mo violate sa inyong rule. and if you think your opponent's argument is strong it's better sigoro nga mo relax ka before reacting, kay when your emotions are high dili nato mabantayan nga nakasulti na ta og bad words.

[poldopunk]

^ this was the statement that was offensive.

this kind of statement makes me wonder of the kind of bolts used in your brain( remember he calls god crazy ), it doesn't hold up.

if you inspect the other party's arguments, you won't find personal attacks, only on the topic. the OP must have taken what the respondent personally so mao ni iyang retaliation which really isn't nice. sadly, by posting your concern here, you automatically lose because this isn't the right way to raise a concern regarding moderators.

[Bisayang_manok]

Jude, relax lang .... there is always a solution to a problem if people truly want to get it fixed, and yes there are ways to say things to prove a point, share opinions and views without sounding on the edge.

Honestly, maybe you didn't mean to be straight forward but reading your response after first quote of Fin was a little to straight , you shouldn't have said right off the bat " study the whole bible " so on .... at times without knowing everyone may say things out of character, thats why we are human.

Heck Religious debates are tough to begin with ... so I say , lets call it a night and look at this as an experience ... seriously the stress isn't worth it

I'm sure both of you meant well ...

my 2 cents

I think JUDE can no longer defend himself na hahaha. ban user na. I pity the guy and I have a soft heart sa mga tao that I feel nga ma outnumbered.

I love reading posts in the S&O forum and I don't know if you had the chance to read some of them. There were times also nga blunt ra pod kaayo si fingolfin to the point nga mora na pod insolto ang dating.

so I dunno why imo ginapuna ang pagka blunt ni JUde and ignored fingolfin's.

anyway im doing this to set the balance.

[Bisayang_manok]

^ this was the statement that was offensive. this kind of statement makes me wonder of the kind of bolts used in your brain( remember he calls god crazy ), it doesn't hold up.

[/color]

kong sakto akong basa bro, he said it after fingolfin said that their God is crazy.

[maymay]

depende sa pagsabot... wa lang mag.abot... lain lain man pangutok.. pero sama sa ginaingon follow forum rules ug dili gali makaya aw yaw nalang ug tuga tuga kay basin masugamak lang unya noon..

[poldopunk]

kong sakto akong basa bro, he said it after fingolfin said that their God is crazy.

its still about the discussion and not intended towards the thread starter, do you see what i mean here?

edit: i may just be arguing about semantics but that's how i understood where the conflict was coming from.