The BAD SIDE of my presidential candidate

[pseudonitz]

---

Pede mag-contest? Gordon is not a good leader? Sa tanan niya nga positions nga gikaptan, tanan, nanglambo: SBMA, Tourism, Red Cross, Olongapo.

Ang iya ra jud weakness kay kanang dili niya pagka plastic. Kung suko, suko. Kung hilak, hilak. Ang uban tawo di siya masabtan. Kay ma-strikto-han ang dating.

No chance to win--> Naa siya chance to win. Nag sige naman ni siya ug libot bisa'g sa una pa as head sa tourism ug 47 years niya sa Red Cross during disasters. Na-meet na niya young leaders ug volunteers from all over. Ang kada-ot, kay wala political machinery: wala'y makapamalit ug boto para niya. But, I'm crossing my fingers and relying on people with good hearts and minds will vote for him.

[pseudonitz]

Ok, Bad side of political candidates:

Noy2x - no energy/passion; sickly; ganiwang. very stressful biya ang presidency

Gibo- Sorry, pero elitista ra kaayo ang akong tan-aw niya. (hobby: fly a plane). He only sees the problems of the rich:CRIMES. Ang solution niya? increase police. He does not know nga ang crimes uban na commit kay wa pamalit food&medicine ang pobre. Big blunders as DND chief (Maguindanao massacre), NDCC (wa naayo ang relief operations) --> meaning he's not a good manager/leader.

Villar -- Business deals and too much spending in the campaign.--So, dako chance mahimong corrupt. I also have some hesitations sa iyang mga igsu-on. Ingon sa probe profiles, nga iyang igsu-on permi ma arrest sa Police, ug ang cool-headed Manny Villar ang permi mo-alegro.

Gordon -- no political machinery. strikto, kataha-an sa mga tawo.

[peewee_toot]

wow..keep it coming guys...this thread is very informative, like the TS i'm also undecided...
@TS

im glad to have helped you sir. i guess this is one way to help myself and the others who are still undecided. let's not be in a hurry. May is yet to come. research and know your presidential bet well...

[peewee_toot]

so far, mao pa ni akong na gather nga information through your replies. hope this'll help. ill update this every now and then...


the BAD SIDE of my presidential candidate (a SUMMARY):



GORDON: He offers no excuse or apologies for the way he is, has no chance of winning, no political machinery, claim on Subic may be a bit immodest, my way or no way sort of leadership, not a good leader, strikto, kataha-an sa mga tawo

GIBO: linked to PGMA, linked to the GARCIA, over-qualified, basin dummy ni gloria, not yet proven quite a lot, somewhat a shadow of the administration, no executive experience, hard time getting the people's trust, platforms/programs not immediate solutions, elitista, nly sees the problems of the rich:CRIMES, Big blunders as DND chief and NDCC,

ERAP: ex-convict, has hidden agenda, too old, already proven could not properly lead

VILLAR: (still needs clarification from ing_pacz), his interest in general (eg. business), protector, return of investments, will use his power for his own benefit, business inclined not really 100% for public servitude, trapo, desperate to win, lack of foresight, dako chance mahimong corrupt,

NOYNOY: under the control of puppet masters (LP, MBC, cory cronies), walay agi, uto-uto, still to prove himself, Mediocre track record, He's no smartass, No vision, no platform, no energy/passion, sickly,



**the above statements may not be entirely true unless proofs can be given**

[peewee_toot]

@pseudonitz

thanks sa reply. noted!

i admire nga ni reply ka sir but i intend this thread para lng sa bad side sa mga candidates. if possible, ayaw nlng i-defend diri imong candidate (like post #61). i guess naay existing thread kng asa ka pwede mka defend sa imong candidate. hoping for your cooperation. thanks sir...

[hulagway]

we are all human..we have bad sides..

[peewee_toot]

^^i know sir. kindly please read the first post. thanks.

btw, post nlng pd diri sa imong mga nahibaw-an nga bad side sa imong presidential bet. thanks again...

[kamatuoran]

mau man c gordon one of the best cya sa nidagan ron but dili man gud winable sayang lang ang vote basin nya mudaog c "MR. IVE BEEN THERE" hehehe so for me im for GIBO background n track record mau kau, n for me pud it wont matter if manok cya sa president dili man na macredit as bad side, to be with the president it doesnt mean pareho na cla he is just doing his job, and he is doing it in a right way man pud, like the late Mr. remonde he was a good person n he have done a great job working with the president.
And for me the bad side is using GOD or Religion, daghan kau ta politicians na gamit sa name sa GOD n Religion and to think they are trapo. kusog kau mupakita na nisimba paatubangan pa hehehe or mag lay minister or mag pastor pakita sa tao na tarung kunuhay pero ang giapas kay power ra ug kwarta.

[peewee_toot]

^^kinsa imong pasabot sa kanang mo gamit og name sa God and religion sir?

[Warnok]

Deviate ko sa thread subject gamay and share my take on some presidential candidates bad sides-


Gibo Teodoro- 1.) He does not have executive experience. I would have preferred someone who has executive experience but since these are the only suspects we have, i have no choice. But if we'll let history be the judge, we have presidents of no executive experience who did well during their terms. 2) His connection with the Arroyos. This is a disadvantage in his campaign and nothing more. While I do not see this as a problem in a Teodoro presidency I listed this as a bad side on the reason that when Gibo wins, he will have a hard time getting the people's trust. We shall expect a lot of rallies and a huge cry of discontent at the beginning of his term. This can cause instability. These are the roadblocks he needs to overcome when he becomes president. 3) His programs/platform(at least some). While they are really good and doable, they are not immediate solutions. But if you are for long term solutions rather than short term, you may not have a problem with that.

I guess my biases show though I tried to be objective. But you can't get an objective assessment from supporters really. You can only have that from those who are impartial at this point.

i just want to clarify this one...no executive experience?....he is the secretary/head of national defense....to me that is an executive job, and it is national in scope.....correct me if im wrong.