Si ADAN ba 900 years old o 900 months old?

[kebotDiNaMute]

---

no, DNA is not only available for a thousand years. DNA can survive a very long time given the right conditions, especially when trapped by a substance that protects that DNA from the environment. example: bacteria trapped in salt deposits.

Chad, Your GEOLOGIC COLUMN has no basis... and its still under debate... but evolutionist never think, they want it! What is the margin of Error for Your Carbon Dating? 400%? hmmmm.. thats a very gud number... hahah!

[kebotDiNaMute]

In my own opinion, it is pointless to argue with an age of someone who never existed . . .

Is the ADAM in the bible a real person?
Or is he just an allegory of the "father" of mankind?

You are right! in the first place athiest never believe it... but these people here are no athiest, they are protesters, half believing the Bible, half is under protest. That is why they want us to join in thier protest...

yes, if you don't believe it, its really really really pointless to talk about it. Why would anyone bother to talk about ZEUS. Unless you play DOTA.

[redline]

You are right! in the first place athiest never believe it... but these people here are no athiest, they are protesters, half believing the Bible, half is under protest. That is why they want us to join in thier protest...

yes, if you don't believe it, its really really really pointless to talk about it. Why would anyone bother to talk about ZEUS. Unless you play DOTA.

hahaha!!! its pointless indeed coz its all going to DOTA!!

maypa duwa-on lang ni ninyo og DOTA pra makita ang katag.. lol!

[bungot25]

no, DNA is not only available for a thousand years. DNA can survive a very long time given the right conditions, especially when trapped by a substance that protects that DNA from the environment. example: bacteria trapped in salt deposits.

DNA can survive in a million years hmmmmm....idlas pa man kas manok bisaya....

[bungot25]

hahaha!!! its pointless indeed coz its all going to DOTA!!

maypa duwa-on lang ni ninyo og DOTA pra makita ang katag.. lol!

hasola anang DOTA para ra man na sa mga bata....ako pag umangkon kusog kaayo mo duwa ana,,,sige lang
ug kabunalan..

[chad_tukes]

Chad, Your GEOLOGIC COLUMN has no basis... and its still under debate... but evolutionist never think, they want it! What is the margin of Error for Your Carbon Dating? 400%? hmmmm.. thats a very gud number... hahah!

Evolutionists never think? that has got to be the funniest comment i've read today.

---------------------------

Evidence from radiometric dating indicates that the Earth is about 4.570 billion years old. The geological or deep time of Earth's past has been organized into various units according to events which took place in each period. Different spans of time on the time scale are usually delimited by major geological or paleontological events, such as mass extinctions.

what's your problem with that? sure, carbon dating may have flaws, but how does a tiny margin of error favor your proposition that the earth is 60,000 years old?

[chad_tukes]

DNA can survive in a million years hmmmmm....idlas pa man kas manok bisaya....

yup, that's what i said. wala ka kasabot? want me to repeat it?

[bungot25]

yup, that's what i said. wala ka kasabot? want me to repeat it?

No, questionable pa na,, wla pa nay claro!

[redline]

hasola anang DOTA para ra man na sa mga bata....ako pag umangkon kusog kaayo mo duwa ana,,,sige lang
ug kabunalan..

OT:hehe!! testingi og dowa bro diba katilaw sb ka.. lol!

[kebotDiNaMute]

Evolutionists never think? that has got to be the funniest comment i've read today.

---------------------------

Evidence from radiometric dating indicates that the Earth is about 4.570 billion years old. The geological or deep time of Earth's past has been organized into various units according to events which took place in each period. Different spans of time on the time scale are usually delimited by major geological or paleontological events, such as mass extinctions.

what's your problem with that? sure, carbon dating may have flaws, but how does a tiny margin of error favor your proposition that the earth is 60,000 years old?

but how does a tiny margin of error favor your proposition that the earth is 60,000 years old?
--- idiotas chad, we still never know... if you believe it is billions of years, its not based on evidence... its based on faith.

Evidence from radiometric dating indicates that the Earth is about 4.570 billion years old. The geological or deep time of Earth's past has been organized into various units according to events which took place in each period. Different spans of time on the time scale are usually delimited by major geological or paleontological events, such as mass extinctions.
--- what events? did it really happened? hahaha, chad evolution carries the burden of truth, because it wants science to support it dba? then how come there are question never answered. Can we ever find the answer to this evolution? Sorry Chad what you believe is not based on solid evidence... its just a tiny pieces of it that never conclude the whole picture. MESOZOIC, PRECAMBRIAN, JURASSIC, TRIASIC.... whatever... tell me if you have solid evidence on this timeline chad... Nobody in a million years told you that... your evidence never conclude, it only suggest. So what now? does suggestion = TRUTH? pft.