The Bible and Evolution

[bluedes]

taking for granted everything else is equal, I'd be more inclined to believe in say for example Santi Claus, or the Easter Bunny, or the Tooth Fairy.. at least they leave actual "alleged" evidence of their existence.. but this super being who lives in the "heavens", looking down on us on our every move and knows everything that will happen.. well, that's just too much for a kid to take.. and then some "adults" go around preaching that its real..

nobody can even tell where "heaven" is supposed to be..

[chad_tukes]

taking for granted everything else is equal, I'd be more inclined to believe in say for example Santi Claus, or the Easter Bunny, or the Tooth Fairy.. at least they leave actual "alleged" evidence of their existence.. but this super being who lives in the "heavens", looking down on us on our every move and knows everything that will happen.. well, that's just too much for a kid to take.. and then some "adults" go around preaching that its real..

nobody can even tell me where "heaven" is supposed to be..

apparently because their mind are hard-wired to believe in God and not tooth fairies. parents are to blamed for brainwashing their child to think there is God, when in fact, it's all just blind faith. that is why i choose to be pastafarian, because FSM cannot be disproven, same with their so-called GOD. in short, if God exist, so is my FSM god.

[newtonscousin]

...and you call yourself Newton's cousin?

kung naa ka sa akong mindset karon, kataw-anan kaayo imong post.. sorry, no offense intended..


hehe.. darwin's cousin na lng.. mas-angayan pa..

i still prefer newton. why?

"Newton did not believe that God merely wound up the clockworks and then let the universe run by itself. On the contrary, he insisted that God was constantly active in the physical world, and, with a dedication bordering on obsession, he developed his heretical Arian theology in secret. He took the Bible seriously as a collection of data derived from a supernatural source, and he studied the prophecies of Daniel and Revelation with methods as rigorous as those he applied to gravity and optics."


God bless!

[chad_tukes]

on topic:

Bible and Evolution can't be on the same statement/sentence. it would be contradicting. God paved the way for Evolution? what a bunch of non-sense. there would be a logical flaw in this since God supposedly created Adam and Eve to be completely human, while Evolution on the other hand, is a gradual process.

[newtonscousin]

on topic:

Bible and Evolution can't be on the same statement/sentence. it would be contradicting. God paved the way for Evolution? what a bunch of non-sense. there would be a logical flaw in this since God supposedly created Adam and Eve to be completely human, while Evolution on the other hand, is a gradual process.

The Pope stated that "evolution may be a better explanation". so sad so many followers.

[chad_tukes]

The Pope stated that "evolution may be a better explanation". so sad so many followers.

that is why you are criticizing the Catholic Church the same way i do to all religions in general.

[newtonscousin]

that is why you are criticizing the Catholic Church the same way i do to all religions in general.

and how your religion explain your existence?

[bluedes]

on topic:

Bible and Evolution can't be on the same statement/sentence. it would be contradicting. God paved the way for Evolution? what a bunch of non-sense. there would be a logical flaw in this since God supposedly created Adam and Eve to be completely human, while Evolution on the other hand, is a gradual process.

it will be a contradiction using old interpretations

or

people will have to interpret the Bible differently.. like what they are doing now, using science to interpret it differently.. the sad thing is, they are using science to propel further their own agenda, and even to a point of using science to discredit science.. now that's funny..

the moment they do that, its kinda hypocritical.. how can they use science to prove their interpretation of the bible in the aim to discredit science.. its like you're using a boat (science) to get some fish (religion), but burning the boat as you get to the middle of the lake..

[Pein]

it will be a contradiction using old interpretations

or

people will have to interpret the Bible differently.. like what they are doing now, using science to interpret it differently.. the sad thing is, they are using science to propel further their own agenda, and even to a point of using science to discredit science.. now that's funny..

the moment they do that, its kinda hypocritical.. how can they use science to prove their interpretation of the bible in the aim to discredit science.. its like you're using a boat (science) to get some fish (religion), but burning the boat as you get to the middle of the lake..

dili man siguro pag discredit na sa science bro kay ako mutuo man ko ug science especially kung proven jud. dili man jud totally gi reject ang science bro kay naa man puy tinuod sa science bah pero dili lang jud tanan ug kaning dili tinuod mao nay among gi reject. matod pa ni bro eli "the Bible is an exact science" daw. ambot kung unsaon na niya pag prove but i believe ma prove na niya just like sa akong gipanghatag nga mga examples nga nakasuwat sa Bible nga proven in science.

[honey89]

No it is quite accurate labeling and term. Words used by members expose their deep hatreds and resentments to God, Scriptures, Christians, Creationism, and Me. It comes out in the language that is used and how they describe that which they choose not to believe. Lie all you want to yourself but it is still there. I love how when they are challenged, their disbelief is questioned, they love to throw the word predigest. When what they do is far worst. They can spit and blaspheme at God and religion, but do not tell them id pisses off God, even if it was written over 2,000 years ago. Foolishness. Acts of children and not of adults.


resentments towards God, Scriptures, Christians, Creationism and You? Woah, woah.. slow down there.. you're going too far.. that's your imagined resentment, not mine..
what you're doing is forcing down your belief on other people's throats.. that's the big difference.. there's belief, and there's reality.. don't mix them up.. kapeesh?

"Forcing one's belief on other people's throats" actually works both ways here in this forum, not just in selected threads.