Could The Bible and Science Both be Correct?

[Malic]

---

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.



.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
okaaayyy..

seriously bro..

since you already know the real meaning of scientifically accurate, then go ahead, continue on with your line of thinking..

I'm confuse here. Is this your counter argument? If that's the case, you have committed again one of the fallacies in Argument/Debate.

trying to discredit an argument by making it look stupid or dumb or using sacrastic comments w/o any counter argument is wrong. For you to have some credibility you must give your argument rather than assuming that your assumption is the right one. Using smileys cannot give clear points against or for to the arguments at hand.


Are you the same guy who said that you are going to cripple me intellectually? tsk tsk...

you committed 2 violations already, for me these are signs that you don't have the right tools to participate in real debates. lisod ni nga mopadayun pa ko kay magsige lang ko ani ug bantay sa imong mga logical fallacies in Arguments.

so again thank you. for what? secret.

[kebotDiNaMute]

hahahaha..good answer!!!

puede ra man unta to si God pein pero He wants to use people becasue we are His co-creator.

mora ba ug Boss nga ang secretary ang gipasuwat sa report.

then so what kung ang secretary ang nisuwat does it mean nga wala nay authority gikan sa Boss?

well there are cases in the bible where makakita ka ug mga butang nga can be considered as scientifically correct. The good thing is tho kining mga tawhana are not scientist but the data they had put in the bible are scientifically accurate.

So it makes you wonder kung asa sila kuha ug data.

hmmm, excellent bro... they way u said it TUMPAK kaau!

you have my attention bro... ill keep reading.

[kebotDiNaMute]

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.



.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
okaaayyy..

seriously bro..

since you already know the real meaning of scientifically accurate, then go ahead, continue on with your line of thinking..

so daug na? kinsay na cripple?

i hope wala... i never consider this an intellectual battleground... but some people think they are better.. hmm... i want to see it...

[kebotDiNaMute]

james, kung kasabot ka sa meaning sa "mangangkon lage dayon", you will understand what chad tukes meant by it..

its not about being so clever and all that demanding standards.. who's demanding anyway..

nah blue, mo ingon gani ka mangangkon its about originality of idea, material or anything... ikaw wala maka sabot blue... those findings just came out recently.... the first idea was been around like 2000 years? hmmmm... ambot lang blue if naka sabot ka pod sa binisaya... ka alegre!

[Malic]

hmmm, excellent bro... they way u said it TUMPAK kaau!

you have my attention bro... ill keep reading.

.........

so daug na? kinsay na cripple?

i hope wala... i never consider this an intellectual battleground... but some people think they are better.. hmm... i want to see it...

same here, wala jud na sa utok nako nga this is an intellectual battleground and nver in my mind sa tanan nakong ka argue diri mo Cripple intellectually sa akong mga ka argue. Unfortunately some people think that they are so superior.

[bluedes]

yay! hahaha! saba blue, mao na imo problema blue ngita jud ka boxing... pag ka toy toy nmo og brain oi... kita ka sa imo mga analogy! i want to fight naman... hahaha! naa pay pa cripple cripple.. hahaha! hahay!mao ni problema sa mga feleer, mag lagot gani, hala bell to bell nalang.. hahaha!

abi nmo ginoo ga sulat sa bible...
--- uu, ginoo ga sulat sa 10commandments... karon unsa na? pag ka toytoy... hahaha! hoy, mag binogo gani ka ayaw pod ipa klaro oi... bolokon man pod diay ka blue...

nahan ka trash talk blue... im up. but make sure u have a point ha... bsin puro garbage ra... pataka bya yaw yaw... ingon ka ako og si malic are ONE... idiotas jud!

play on kebz.. play on..

nah blue, mo ingon gani ka mangangkon its about originality of idea, material or anything... ikaw wala maka sabot blue... those findings just came out recently.... the first idea was been around like 2000 years? hmmmm... ambot lang blue if naka sabot ka pod sa binisaya... ka alegre!

as much as i delight in reading your replies, its really no challenge anymore..

its more like you have problems with reading comprehension kebz, mao na di na lng ko mu-explain.. pointless..

[bluedes]

I'm confuse here. Is this your counter argument? If that's the case, you have committed again one of the fallacies in Argument/Debate.

trying to discredit an argument by making it look stupid or dumb or using sacrastic comments w/o any counter argument is wrong. For you to have some credibility you must give your argument rather than assuming that your assumption is the right one. Using smileys cannot give clear points against or for to the arguments at hand.


Are you the same guy who said that you are going to cripple me intellectually? tsk tsk...

you committed 2 violations already, for me these are signs that you don't have the right tools to participate in real debates. lisod ni nga mopadayun pa ko kay magsige lang ko ani ug bantay sa imong mga logical fallacies in Arguments.

so again thank you. for what? secret.

oh, i'm not trying to argue with you anymore.. like i said, you claim to know the meaning of scientific accuracy, so go on with your own understanding.. if it makes you happy.. why would i prevent you from attaining your own happiness.. (they say ignorance is bliss)

i really don't know how to respond to you anymore..

do you even know what you're talking about?

[bluedes]

.........




same here, wala jud na sa utok nako nga this is an intellectual battleground and nver in my mind sa tanan nakong ka argue diri mo Cripple intellectually sa akong mga ka argue. Unfortunately some people think that they are so superior.

sorry if you felt that way.. but as much as I want to argue with you more, its no challenge naman gud..

i have more fun arguing with james, because at least he is a "gentleman" at it.. in fact, its more like a free exchange of ideas and philosophy.. not a battle of intellect with you..

i'm not here to have an intellectual battleground.. i'm just here to express my views and ideas..

but you seem to want to argue with me on intellectual grounds, since you keep trying to disprove me personally.. hehe.. good luck on that.. i'm just defending myself, and if in the process it will cripple you intellectually, sorry na lng..

[bluedes]

and oh, one last thing...

i can prove that Malic and kebotDiNaMute are one and the same person..



but of course, you don't want that, now would you?





*but if i'm wrong, well, i'm wrong..

[Malic]

oh, i'm not trying to argue with you anymore.. like i said, you claim to know the meaning of scientific accuracy, so go on with your own understanding.. if it makes you happy.. why would i prevent you from attaining your own happiness.. (they say ignorance is bliss)

i really don't know how to respond to you anymore..

do you even know what you're talking about?

hahaha...I thought that you want to cripple me intellectually. I respect your decision. so this ends here.

ani ni blue...you claim nga you have the right argument about something then i also claim that I have the right point of view. since atong POV is in opposition let us give our arguments and justifications and let us see kung kinsa jud ang mo stand under scrutiny. But it looks like dili ka gusto e scrutinize imong POV. Remember you started this by quoting my statement and you gave your counter idea by using questions? respond ra ko bluedes.


do you even know what you're talking about? <---- mao ni ang style sa mga wala nay ikatubag,ila dayun e TRY ug discredit ka instead of going after the argument ang tao na ang tirahan, VIOLATION number three blue AD HOMINEM.