
Originally Posted by
chad_tukes
you must be joking.
the evidence of the flood NOT happening far outweighs the evidence that it actually happened. for example, i can present evidence that Evolution happened and you can present evidence for creationism but the former would be more valid than the latter. why? because Evolution is fact and creationism is myth. you present 6 evidences but it doesn't correlate to Noah's story at all. it could be something else. how quick you are to conclude that the Great Flood happened. try harder.
chad ok ka lang? asa gani imo evidence? ... b asa na...