Evolution is now A FACT OF LIFE

[Malic]

---

Yeepeee...

"It doesn't mean however that because we don't know everything about gravity it disproves its existence. The same goes for evolution."
--- a newly discovered galaxy, does not mean it never existed before.. right?
--- what about god? D JUD? DILI AS N DILI JUD? hahaha! ka alegre... unsa mani thinking of the possibilities or avoiding the possibilities.. hahaha.

so God is contained in space?

[kebotDiNaMute]

issue on dating rocks? this is what creationists love, they always focus on what seems to be lapses and not on successful dates.

Yes, because creationist claims the other way around... now that you admit the so-called lapses so you understand why it is not accurate.

successful dates
--- this is a very subjective based result. if it complies with evolution then its successful. hahaha, do you know that they are performing the same procedure to date fossils? so if isa mo qualify so successful, so if isa dili aw just drop it... no questions asked...
--- sa binisaya ani brad, mao ni gitawag na "BOTIKAW BOTIKAW" hahaha! yet mo 2o pod mo... pede raman mo 2o, pero mo insist sak2... aw mao nay deperensya. sa mailards ra diay ni rn? hmmm...

[kebotDiNaMute]

so God is contained in space?

naa kay proof ana? don't force me to say it coz i don't push my idea... i don't contest... don't give me a statement, I DONT BUY IT. Frustrated? Try again bro... you cannot counter me, coz i dont contest...

so let me ask you MO CONTEST JAPON KA SA EVOLUTION? then its your burden not mine...

[Malic]

Yes, because creationist claims the other way around... now that you admit the so-called lapses so you understand why it is not accurate.

what? you think that when the first experiment on light bulb happened successfully? tsk tsk...

morag wala nimo ma gets kebs. lapses doesn't mean the method is not accurate. there are many factors involve.

and still by the tone of your argument, you still focus on the lapses rather on successful dates.

successful dates
--- this is a very subjective based result. if it complies with evolution then its successful. hahaha, do you know that they are performing the same procedure to date fossils? so if isa mo qualify so successful, so if isa dili aw just drop it... no questions asked...
--- sa binisaya ani brad, mao ni gitawag na "BOTIKAW BOTIKAW" hahaha! yet mo 2o pod mo... pede raman mo 2o, pero mo insist sak2... aw mao nay deperensya. sa mailards ra diay ni rn? hmmm...

it's only subjective when you insist on the theory that creationists had proposed. This is science kebs so you base it on science. besides dates of creation had Christians fight among themselves.

botikaw boitkaw only applies to mythical stories. Science had mathematical probabilities and other proven battle and logically tested methods.

[Malic]

naa kay proof ana? don't force me to say it coz i don't push my idea... i don't contest... don't give me a statement, I DONT BUY IT. Frustrated? Try again bro... you cannot counter me, coz i dont contest...

so let me ask you MO CONTEST JAPON KA SA EVOLUTION? then its your burden not mine...

see the question mark? can you or can you not spot a question mark? i was questioning your proposition.

[brownprose]

sigh, what evidence again? what if the evidence is another story? you call that science... tsk tsk tsk...

honestly how much do you understand about common ancestors for you to say it's another story? do yourself a favor, READ.

Lets see how forensic deals with your timeline(million years).

Essential Forensic Biology - Google Books

Page 39.

"C dating is insufficiently precise to accurately age the skeleton of a person who died within the last 100-200 years"
--- so how much more in millions... hahha! why is forensic never relies on C dating? hmmmm... because the result is a LIE. dba? and cannot be used in the court of law because it doesn't make sense...

don't advertise your ignorance kebs. pataka lang gyud kag quote og source oy. nagtoo diay ka nga carbon dating ra gyud ang the only radiometric tool by paleontologist? I'm just talking of radiometric tools. I still have to mention stratigraphy and molecular clocks as other tools to know our evolutionary past. Read lagi your source before blabbing kay masunggo napod ka! hehehe...kadaghan na raba ka nasunggo sa imong misuse of sources.

fyi...The uranium-lead radiometric dating scheme has been refined to the point that the error margin in dates of rocks can be as low as less than two million years in two-and-a-half billion years. An error margin of 2–5 % has been achieved on younger Mesozoic rocks. Source: http://www.geo.cornell.edu/geology/c...Lecture04.pdf; ScienceDirect - Journal of African Earth Sciences : The age and petrology of the Chimbadzi Hill Intrusion, NW Zimbabwe: first evidence for early Paleoproterozoic magmatism in Zimbabwe
So, get it now?

--- so brown... unsa to? evolution is like forensics... hahaha! u must be kidding me... maybe ang pattern sa investigation pareho pero ang result, dako kaau deperensya... so mas sak2 si evolution kay ni forensics if thats what you want to push... hehehe go ahead be my guest.

Sorry, you're either a pathological liar or simply manipulative. I did not say that "evolution is like forensics" I said and to repeat: "The study of evolution is like forensics." The study of evolution and to repeat the study of evolution IS LIKE FORENSICS because you also "work back" or deduce/trace current evidence(s) to understand what really happened in the past.

kebs, if you're here to show your "pagkasweto" you can go ahead and flaunt it -- I'm here to correct notions and misinformation. Consider this a favor para di ka pirmi ma laughing stock dire.

[brownprose]

Yeepeee...

"It doesn't mean however that because we don't know everything about gravity it disproves its existence. The same goes for evolution."
--- a newly discovered galaxy, does not mean it never existed before.. right?

what does your logic tell you?

--- what about god? D JUD? DILI AS N DILI JUD? hahaha! ka alegre... unsa mani thinking of the possibilities or avoiding the possibilities.. hahaha.

Unsa diay pasabot nimo ani kebs? fyi, kebs, I'm no atheist. I believe in God as much as you do. But I also believe there are truths that I should believe in the secular domain - like the truth in evolution. I can prove it even with my Bible.

[kebotDiNaMute]

what? you think that when the first experiment on light bulb happened successfully? tsk tsk...

morag wala nimo ma gets kebs. lapses doesn't mean the method is not accurate. there are many factors involve.

and still by the tone of your argument, you still focus on the lapses rather on successful dates.



it's only subjective when you insist on the theory that creationists had proposed. This is science kebs so you base it on science. besides dates of creation had Christians fight among themselves.

botikaw boitkaw only applies to mythical stories. Science had mathematical probabilities and other proven battle and logically tested methods.

you think that when the first experiment on light bulb happened successfully?
--- did the mars expedition solves your problem, yet you call the method accurate... sorry malic, the result will tell the difference between lies and fact... don't force yourself to conclude, they havent resolved the issue yet... let them continue by the way... but don't tell me they are accurate... tsk tsk tsk...

and still by the tone of your argument, you still focus on the lapses rather on successful dates.
--- because there were no result presented yet... only a defendant trying hard to eliminate ... hmmm... d nalang sumpayan... kay lisud na...

it's only subjective when you insist on the theory that creationists had proposed. This is science kebs so you base it on science. besides dates of creation had Christians fight among themselves.
--- aw nya d man ko mo contest? so? i don't have that burdent to tell you i am right... i dont care... sorry malic TRY HARDER.

[kebotDiNaMute]

see the question mark? can you or can you not spot a question mark? i was questioning your proposition.

malic sorry, when you said that god is something... i don't buy it as my statement...

of course its a proposition... sorry i don't contest who he is... lets talk about your EVO since you kept on telling us they are correct and accurate.. hahaha

[kebotDiNaMute]

what does your logic tell you?



Unsa diay pasabot nimo ani kebs? fyi, kebs, I'm no atheist. I believe in God as much as you do. But I also believe there are truths that I should believe in the secular domain - like the truth in evolution. I can prove it even with my Bible.

what does your logic tell you?
--- loosing reasons/explanations? its straight forward man brad...

hmmm, Yes the Bible have proof of Evolution... The implication is there is a creator....

so let me ask you do you believe on the Creator?

what these people are trying to do is to eliminate Creator through evolution... kebot will try to contest on that claim through evolution...