Evolution is now A FACT OF LIFE

[jamesmusslewhite]

---

my goodness james, is this the only thing you can do? I pity you.

You seem to pity this and you seem to pity that, does that mean you are just pity-full

hahaha, testing huh? good alibi, i don't buy it.

I was not selling anything. Your 2 cents worth just might get you a stick of gum.

[Pein]

Dili. BUT before you even object to/oppose on something, you should know what you're objecting to, right? Mao bitaw gi encourage mo pagbasa so you will use all of your mental faculties to assess the material you're reading.

Agree. But it just so happens that there are many things that science has absolute answers and evolution happens to be one of them.

That is an outdated view. The science we know today is unlike the science we know like twenty years ago. Science has become more precise, more mathematical and more data driven and will continue to be so in the future. If you notice, when evolution was used to be just a theory has now become a fact simply because science has gathered more data about it -- tested it down to the very genetics of it all.

bisan pag muingon kag more precise na karon, dili gihapon na absolute. daghan pa kaayong wala madiscover ug everytime naay madiskobrihan, mausab ang inyong data. maong applicable gihapon hangtod karon ang giingon sa akong instructor. daghan pa kaayong dapat diskobrihon...wala pa gani mo nakahibaw kung unsa juy cause aning tanan nga ni exist...

[brownprose]

bisan pag muingon kag more precise na karon, dili gihapon na absolute. daghan pa kaayong wala madiscover ug everytime naay madiskobrihan, mausab ang inyong data.

Generally correct ka. But there are scientific facts that are unlikely to change, for example: The Gravitational Theory, Electro-Magnetism Theory, Evolutionary Theory and everything else that are in the status of scientific fact. The reason why evolution has become a fact like gravity is the overwhelming confluence of evidence -- evidence that are culled not just from Biology alone or from Geology or Genetics alone but data/evidence that came out from the many disciplines that try to test the truth in evolution. It is therefore not only a fact coming from one branch of science but a combination of all the other facts presented by these other branches. Which means, one has to disprove evolution from the point of view of Biology, Geology, Chemistry, Physics and etc.

As it goes, evolution has come to be more pronounced as a fact as more and more evidence have come to support it as the years pass. It will have to take one great miracle pien for us to prove that evolution is wrong. But evolution for me is a divinely ordained event that proves that God is a god of process than of biblical literalism.

maong applicable gihapon hangtod karon ang giingon sa akong instructor. daghan pa kaayong dapat diskobrihon...wala pa gani mo nakahibaw kung unsa juy cause aning tanan nga ni exist...

Yes. Science is always a work in progress. Just like gravity. There is so much to learn or discover about it. It doesn't mean however that because we don't know everything about gravity it disproves its existence. The same goes for evolution.

[kebotDiNaMute]

Creationism implies christianity is right? far from it.

naay adam sa amo and why some don't believe in Adam? libog man ni oi. wa ka ko kasabot sa connection.

Creationism implies christianity is right? far from it.
--- hmmm. i dont find any creation theory from your religion malic. that is why you don't want to accept creationism... gotcha? hmmmm.

--- nah forget adam malic... i don't know why you refuse to understand.. but you have your reasons... nvm... forget adam...

[Malic]

yep, a debate is the free exchange of Idea as to find all bases if facts. Social Studies Duel-logic drills are only that a test.


This is not Monty Python's "I want to buy an Argument skit."

good that you know. so start doing just that and stop preaching.

take a look at you previous posts, it's filled with insults and prejudice pointed towards non-Christians.

I was not selling anything. Your 2 cents worth just might get you a stick of gum.

huh? and you think that you amount to something? bwahaha, what a conceited man you are.

[Malic]

Creationism implies christianity is right? far from it.
--- hmmm. i dont find any creation theory from your religion malic. that is why you don't want to accept creationism... gotcha? hmmmm.

try google, it might give you some good idea.

--- nah forget adam malic... i don't know why you refuse to understand.. but you have your reasons... nvm... forget adam...

hahaha, good dodge...yeah forget Adam...kay wala man pod ka kasabot, obvious kaayo sa imong question nga walay connection. ratol na kebs?

[Malic]

claims are backed by proof and evidence. Might as well consider gathering evidence before discussing. In a court of law there is always a period to gather evidence... and i think you know why. hmmm.

Again its not the link. its the content... by the way its the start.. hahay!

hahayz...of course it's not the link.

[kebotDiNaMute]

misguided imong understanding what a common ancestor means. better read what common ancestor means.



Hehehe. Ufortunately this is not only a VERY VERY WRONG ANALOGY but is a gross misunderstanding of evolutionary history. The study of evolution is like forensics. You don't need to turn back time to observe what happen...you only need to generate evidence and validate it from other scientific fields.

sigh, what evidence again? what if the evidence is another story? you call that science... tsk tsk tsk...

Lets see how forensic deals with your timeline(million years).

Essential Forensic Biology - Google Books

Page 39.

"C dating is insufficiently precise to accurately age the skeleton of a person who died within the last 100-200 years"
--- so how much more in millions... hahha! why is forensic never relies on C dating? hmmmm... because the result is a LIE. dba? and cannot be used in the court of law because it doesn't make sense...
--- so brown... unsa to? evolution is like forensics... hahaha! u must be kidding me... maybe ang pattern sa investigation pareho pero ang result, dako kaau deperensya... so mas sak2 si evolution kay ni forensics if thats what you want to push... hehehe go ahead be my guest.

[Malic]

sigh, what evidence again? what if the evidence is another story? you call that science... tsk tsk tsk...

Lets see how forensic deals with your timeline(million years).

Essential Forensic Biology - Google Books

Page 39.

"C dating is insufficiently precise to accurately age the skeleton of a person who died within the last 100-200 years"
--- so how much more in millions... hahha! why is forensic never relies on C dating? hmmmm... because the result is a LIE. dba? and cannot be used in the court of law because it doesn't make sense...
--- so brown... unsa to? evolution is like forensics... hahaha! u must be kidding me... maybe ang pattern sa investigation pareho pero ang result, dako kaau deperensya... so mas sak2 si evolution kay ni forensics if thats what you want to push... hehehe go ahead be my guest.

issue on dating rocks? this is what creationists love, they always focus on what seems to be lapses and not on successful dates.

[kebotDiNaMute]

Yes. Science is always a work in progress. Just like gravity. There is so much to learn or discover about it. It doesn't mean however that because we don't know everything about gravity it disproves its existence. The same goes for evolution.

Yeepeee...

"It doesn't mean however that because we don't know everything about gravity it disproves its existence. The same goes for evolution."
--- a newly discovered galaxy, does not mean it never existed before.. right?
--- what about god? D JUD? DILI AS N DILI JUD? hahaha! ka alegre... unsa mani thinking of the possibilities or avoiding the possibilities.. hahaha.