Evolution is now A FACT OF LIFE

[Pein]

Do you think the physical is not ONE with the CONSCIOUSNESS or MIND of MAN?

Are they separate both MIND and BODY?

sa spiritual aspect, natural pwede nang buwagon...

[bluedes]

No chief you are so wrong that you appear to not know what you are talking about. So show us your figures that prove his are wrong. You can not, because it is scientific fact and completely accurate. You are wrong and you own science backs it up. Do not act like a fool. You try to act like an intellectual. Look up the information then apologize to the man for you rude and misleading remarks. Be half the man you think you are, and less of a punk than I now believe you are. You call a man a lier for telling that truth?

No you use science to disprove the fools who make stupid statements and make false accusation and try to claim it is science, God is science, he established the laws that govern the universe. There is no science with out God, but there is God without science. I here member spout science this and science that, in a vain attempt to turn God into a faerie tale. Yet they never state what theory, the theory of evolution covers over 2 dozen sciences. each with many theories. theories full of theories, full of theories, full of theories, and fantastic stretches of the imagination. They give yoy date they can not tell you where they came from, drawings explaining things they have no truth to back their claims. You let science make outlandish assumptions and beat the Bible to death. It is a double standard. Evolution is still after 160 years still a theory and not a Law. It is the theory of evolution not the law of evolution.

Theories are unproven scientific concepts, UNPROVEN. Stop the bible bashing by quoting the word evolution, because the real truth is you hate the BIBLE and do not really know why. If you use the evolution then quote the theory so it can be properly debated. We say Bible and you say give me prof, so we give the scripture. You say no, Evolution, well that is a bunch of theories, so it is only fair that you quote the actual theory. If you do not know the theories than go to another topic because you are not versed enough to be debating God from a position of ignorance

what?! are you kidding me?

you chose to stop thinking.. you chose to stop using your brain to look for answers.. that's your choice..

why would i hate the bible? go look for trouble somewhere else.. you're barking off the wrong tree.. i respect the bible and i know where it belongs.. in religious texts.. not in a scientific community.. its you guys who are misusing science to prove your religious texts are true.. gosh, what a more ignorant way is that.. you even depend on science to prove your point.. that path has led to many more blunders in history than ever..

[regnauld]

sa spiritual aspect, natural pwede nang buwagon...

So asa man gikan ang tawo sa yuta when in fact nag una man ang soul or consciousness, di ba?

[regnauld]

mutuo diay ug reincarnation ang science? beh pagsabot sa mo diri beh...

Read lagi the works of Dr. IAN STEVENSON on REINCARNATION kapatid. Si Dr. Ian Stevenson kay scientist and Atheist man siya!

[Pein]

So asa man gikan ang tawo sa yuta when in fact nag una man ang soul or consciousness, di ba?

adto sa pikas thread paghisgot ana reg kay physical aspects ang among gihisgutan diri...

[Pein]

Read lagi the works of Dr. IAN STEVENSON on REINCARNATION kapatid. Si Dr. Ian Stevenson kay scientist and Atheist man siya!

si Dr. Ian Stevenson ba ang nagrepresent sa whole science community?

[regnauld]

si Dr. Ian Stevenson ba ang nagrepresent sa whole science community?

It doesn't mean that because Dr. Ian Stevenson did not represent the whole scientific community, it follows that there is no EVIDENCE that REINCARNATION exists!

So far as far as I know, wala pay naka refute sa works ni Dr. Ian Stevenson who was a PSYCHIATRIST and ATHEIST!

[Pein]

It doesn't mean that because Dr. Ian Stevenson did not represent the whole scientific community, it follows that there is no EVIDENCE that REINCARNATION exists!

So far as far as I know, wala pay naka refute sa works ni Dr. Ian Stevenson who was a PSYCHIATRIST and ATHEIST!

naa lagi DAW evidence...ang pangutana, gi accept na ba na sa science community or nagsolo rana siya?

bisan pag muingon ka nga walay nakarefute, ang pangutana kung gi accept na ba ang iyang theory as a FACT...wala noh?

hmmmm...

[jamesmusslewhite]

I suppose you did not use computer, drive a car, watch television, use appliance just to prove that evolution is false. Quite interesting for a "scientist" as yourself.

That is social progression. The scientific word is progress, that is not the Theory of evolution.

If our heads grew, our brains got smaller, we all lost a finger or a toe, than that can be called a product of Evolution, in fact it would progress the Therory of evolution.

Evolution is the progressive change form bacteria to monkey and on to modern man. All the different steps explaining the change. That is the actual problem with the Theory of Evolution, we have no verifiable missing links between staged. The fossil records on show beginning and end of each species, no transitions blending the two. All we really have is artiest drawings but nothing verifiable.

There is a plant in North America that only survives because of bees which pollinate the fruit making the seeds to continue the species survival. Without bee it would be extint in less than 100 years. Yet Evolutional science states the tree lived 600 million years before there were bees on earth. But science can not say where the bees came from. So how did the plant survive for 600 million years? Science will not try to answer that question, because it would disprove the time dates they used. The tree has not evolved and the bees have not evolved, so how did it survive? simple question. I saw many cases like that during the 30 years as a biologist.

[regnauld]

adto sa pikas thread paghisgot ana reg kay physical aspects ang among gihisgutan diri...

Unsa man diay ang REAL NATURE sa tawo? Lawas?