Evolution is now A FACT OF LIFE

[bluedes]

pagproduce sa lagi mog life from a single protein to prove your theory. as long as dili mo makaproduce ana, magpabiling THEORY gihapon nang inyo...

The leading mathematicians in the century met with some evolutionary biologists and confronted them with the fact that according to mathematical statistics, the probabilities of a cell or a protein molecule coming into existence were nil. They even constructed a model of a large computer and tried to figure out the possibilities of a cell ever happening. The result was zero possibility! - Wistar Institute, 1966

unsay masulti nimo ani bluedes?

bogus man na imong mga reports pein.. kinsa gud na ang leading mathematician of the century? basa lng ka ug unsa imong makit-an diha unya tuo pud dayon ka.. mao na ang mentality sa creationist..

fyi, ang leading mathematician of the century died already.. David Hilbert.. so far wa pa jud naka lampas niya sa iyang pagka-ngilngig sa mathematics.. the other mathematicians are great also, and their contributions are very influential, pero nagsunod ra na sila sa gisugdan ni Hilbert.

get your sources straight, otherwise you'll end up committing slander or spreading false information.. like your idol hovind..

[Pein]

bogus man na imong mga reports pein.. kinsa gud na ang leading mathematician of the century? basa lng ka ug unsa imong makit-an diha unya tuo pud dayon ka.. mao na ang mentality sa creationist..

fyi, ang leading mathematician of the century died already.. David Hilbert.. so far wa pa jud naka lampas niya sa iyang pagka-ngilngig sa mathematics.. the other mathematicians are great also, and their contributions are very influential, pero nagsunod ra na sila sa gisugdan ni Hilbert.

get your sources straight, otherwise you'll end up committing slander or spreading false information.. like your idol hovind..

so sayop diay tong giingon nga zero possibility ang life from a protein molecule?

[jamesmusslewhite]

You are not using your CRITICAL THINKING here but just your FAITH which is never universal in the first place.

What is your basis or EVIDENCE and PROOF that there is such thing as a final judgment? Do you think the world will end because of the final judgment and do you really think that this is LITERAL? Sounds like Science Fiction.

The UNIVERSE is here to stay as long as there is the LAW of EVOLUTION!

BTW, many people esp. from other christian denominations have predicted the final judgment long ago that the world will end but they were PROVEN WRONG AGAIN!

Faith is the one thing you have to have to understand, without faith you just keep asking the same silly questions that can not be answered without time. You want a magic crystal ball that you can look into ane understand what you can not understand. You are not seeking prof, you are seeking vindication to support you lack of faith and disbelief. That is the secret you can not grasp. God owes you nothing, and he does not need to justify or do parlor tricks to amuse you. He is tired of that, because man is too much of a fool to keep entertained. Man is worst than a dog, a dog does not bite the hand that feeds it, but man always will. God gave us rules and we ignore then, we choose denial of him, we try to make him a myth, a faerie tale. Faith now is the only way to reach him. You have to love him enough to trust in him and now it is the only way.

Religions believing in a Final judgment:
Most religions Islam, Christianity, Judaism, Zoroastrianism, Duat, and Rastafarianism

Religions believing in an End Time:
Islam, Christianity, Judaism, Zoroastrianism, Duat, Hinduism, Buddhism, BKWSU, Hopi, Maya, Greek mythology, Norse mythology, Bahá'í Faith, Ahmadiyya, and Rastafarianism

The world has not ended yet, but it will. What science do you have that says otherwise? How is the theory of Evolution, sorry but it is still only considered a theory not a law, provides assurances the earth will last as long as the theory? That statement sound like Sci fi.

[bluedes]

so sayop diay tong giingon nga zero possibility ang life from a protein molecule?

ngano gud tawn zero ang possibility?

ipakita ang mathematical calculations, ug unsa imong variables gi-consider.. do u even know the basic principles of probability? asa ang research paper? where is your source?

you probably got that news article from a creationist website.. the problem with creationists is wa na jud moy credibility because you're well known to fabricate stories just to destroy the fruits of science as time and time will show..

kung mao na ang case noh, why would scientists spend time trying to look for life on other planets in outerspace if zero ang possibility of life from a protein molecule? they have already tested which environments are conducive for a protein molecule to exist without it breaking apart.. so they are also finding planets with that kind of environment..

oh wait, di man diay mo mutuo na naay life from another planet noh? kay creationism gud.. God created life here on Earth only.. gosh.. ma-ilhan na where ideas of creationists are coming from..

attached ra kaayo mo sa creationist story oi.. I believe in God but dili pud ko ana ka "clingy".. be open to the possibilities of the universe around you.. use your head, God gave that as a gift man diba.. otherwise, zombies na lng ta tanan ani..

[Pein]

ngano gud tawn zero ang possibility?

ipakita ang mathematical calculations, ug unsa imong variables gi-consider.. do u even know the basic principles of probability? asa ang research paper? where is your source?

you probably got that news article from a creationist website.. the problem with creationists is wa na jud moy credibility because you're well known to fabricate stories just to destroy the fruits of science as time and time will show..

kung mao na ang case noh, why would scientists spend time trying to look for life on other planets in outerspace if zero ang possibility of life from a protein molecule? they have already tested which environments are conducive for a protein molecule to exist without it breaking apart.. so they are also finding planets with that kind of environment..

oh wait, di man diay mo mutuo na naay life from another planet noh? kay creationism gud.. God created life here on Earth only.. gosh.. ma-ilhan na where ideas of creationists are coming from..

attached ra kaayo mo sa creationist story oi.. I believe in God but dili pud ko ana ka "clingy".. be open to the possibilities of the universe around you.. use your head, God gave that as a gift man diba.. otherwise, zombies na lng ta tanan ani..

diba ikaw na mismo ang niingon nga wala pa jud mo naka produce ug life from a protein molecule...diba?

nakakita na ba ug life from other planets ang mga scientist? asa ra?

[jamesmusslewhite]

@ pein ,

there are species that never changed . since they suit in the environment .,


the first earth living things are bacterias, until now they never change.

i suggest u study evolution para maka sabot ka,.





if the 2 works together , then religion should admit that some bile claims are just representaion and not claims ,. since these is waht causes the conflic,.

ex. heaven n hell . at the first place never exsisted.

Well all I can say just before you butt gets kicked into the pit for your disbelief, be sure to bring that subject up to God. He is responsible for the Bible, heaven, Hell, Earth, and the Universe. You will understand it then, oh yah, be sure to tell him he is only a myth, I hear he thinks that is funny. Then ask Satan why he made up evolution just to trick you, because I am sure that will give him a chuckle, besides you have have an eternity to ask him.............hehehehe

[Sinyalan]

Good question, because for many years I believed in evolution with the same fervor as most of these member, because of what I was told in High schools and colleges. Then the more I researched the sciences i began to discover that the roots of evolutionary science are only theories established 160 years ago. That most facts and dates were magically pulled from the air. That most were contrived by confessed Athiest with a personal agenda. Evolution wants to establish 4.6 billion years as the age of the earth. Look up the beginning of this belief. Evolutionary transitions of species over millions of years, yet have no fossil record or explanations of how the ages are determined. Why skeletal evidence was tampered with, with whole bios established by mythologies established with non-verifiable evidence. Take the Neanderthal man for 100 years depicted as a subspecies by evolutionist, yet in the last decade the books have to be rewritten. Neanderthal was highly intellect having even conducted sucessful surgeries. When evolutionary evidence is proven wrong it is buried, ignored, or simply not corrected in the text books.

I began to see the correlations between science and the Bible. When religious fervor and the atheistic science arrogance is ignored and you look at both with a true open mind; then you realize that they are the same, and each actually supports the other. You ask why is science so determine to falsify and misrepresent facts and evidence, which is explained in the Bible. How was the world like in the past can be found in the truthful sciences. Earth is nowhere near as old as predicted, the Super Collider project and evidence in quartz stone shows that quartz could have been created in less then 100th of a second. There is evidence that man and dinosaurs walked the earth together, found in the Bible, and Ica stones from Peru. Dragon mythologizes found in every ancient culture of the world and every continent on the globe. Evolutions has to deny too much, and assume more than it can actually prove. It is full of it's own mythologies and outlandish beliefs. You have to look at all the evidence and rise above the idiots, fools, and tyrants; then open you eyes, mind, and heart so you can fully interpret the information. The real story is amazing if you are able to grasp the complexity of the story. You can not learn new things if your eyes, mind, and heart are closed; because you can never grasp the truth, only what someone tells you should believe.

The more you try to use science to disprove the concept of God, using facts and not lies and myths, the more you find that science not only can not disprove God, but supports intelligent design.

You have to also research the origins of the bible and the books that were excluded by the church because it caused them problems. Truely understand the properties of the complexity of the works. It is the greatest poem ever written, and no other work ever written by man has the properties of the Bible. The prophecies contained within the pages, and the prophetic messages and predictions contained in the Hebrew alphabet letters contained within the individual words themselves (Bible Codes). The Bible may have been written by man but it was inspired by a God.Study the anchant cultures and mythologies of the world and the common threads from shared common memories from our past. It all fits like a great tapestry the story of the first creation which was destroyed by the great flood. We are not progressing, rather we are regressing as a people, and mankind is suffering from an amnesia we just refuse to face.

ah.. that's the reason why you got out because you can't find answers to your questions and by that, the bible provided you that answer without even knowing if it is really the correct answer. That's just a temporary solution because you just need an quick answer.

To me, I don't see the bible as a reputable source... sure there are good historical accounts but that's about it... history no more no less. Too much fantasy to believe that a man was created though dust. I'm sure you know that humans are not 70% dust/mud/clay but water. Sure that is a good explanation how man created.

Don't worry james, science will eventually prove that the bible will be just as the same as greek gods and goddesses, a myth.

[Sinyalan]

The world has not ended yet, but it will. What science do you have that says otherwise? How is the theory of Evolution, sorry but it is still only considered a theory not a law, provides assurances the earth will last as long as the theory? That statement sound like Sci fi.

I suppose you did not use computer, drive a car, watch television, use appliance just to prove that evolution is false. Quite interesting for a "scientist" as yourself.

[bluedes]

diba ikaw na mismo ang niingon nga wala pa jud mo naka produce ug life from a protein molecule...diba?

nakakita na ba ug life from other planets ang mga scientist? asa ra?

wla pa ka-produce because scientists are still continuously studying and figuring out how this all works.. that's the beauty of scientists, they are passionate and literally devote their lives to study..

but they are also very careful and mindful how their studies will affect society.. ever heard of the Russell-Einstein manifesto? mao na ang dedication of real scientists to the welfare of humanity..
science has been misused, of course, by the wrong people, who have blackmailed real scientists into doing their own bidding..

but what about religion? what has it done so far? religion is not bad, but too many people already claiming you will go to hell if you don't believe in what they believe in.. id rather pass on that and chose to be on the science side..

but sooner or later, the operations of life will unfold before us.. just because wala pa nafigure out doesn't mean its not possible or true.. its like you're saying na wla pa nafigure out that the world was round, so flat jud diay ang world karon? wake up bro, you're not living in the olden times anymore.. the new world is governed by information system already.. and we are learning so much more about our universe exponentially than what we did even 100 years ago.

[Sinyalan]

^^ mao gyud na sila bai... because nothing produced... conclude dayun. Pein doesn't really know that science is a continual study.