Evolution is now A FACT OF LIFE

[brownprose]

All life forms evolve pien, you just don't notice it.

It is a misconception that there are organisms that do/did not evolve.

All organisms evolve. Some evolve faster than the others while some evolve at a much slooooooo000000wer rate that you barely notice their evolution like humans and the examples you mentioned. In natural selection pien, when a specie is well adaptive to the environment
the change (in their genotype) is barely noticeable for a loooooooooooooooooooooooong loooooong time and some or even many of these organisms continue to thrive to this day.

siguro lagi sa field of microbiology, pwede ma apply ang evolution PERO DILI SA TANANG LIVING ORGANISM. kay naay mga living organisms nga wala pa gihapon mu evolve hangtod karon millions of years naman unta ang nilabay.

You mean to say pien that you admit that evolution occurs in microorganisms? Don't you think it is inconsistent with the creationist idea that God created all organisms as they were not as they are about to become in the future?

[jamesmusslewhite]

^^ I wonder why you stop believing evolution.

Good question, because for many years I believed in evolution with the same fervor as most of these member, because of what I was told in High schools and colleges. Then the more I researched the sciences i began to discover that the roots of evolutionary science are only theories established 160 years ago. That most facts and dates were magically pulled from the air. That most were contrived by confessed Athiest with a personal agenda. Evolution wants to establish 4.6 billion years as the age of the earth. Look up the beginning of this belief. Evolutionary transitions of species over millions of years, yet have no fossil record or explanations of how the ages are determined. Why skeletal evidence was tampered with, with whole bios established by mythologies established with non-verifiable evidence. Take the Neanderthal man for 100 years depicted as a subspecies by evolutionist, yet in the last decade the books have to be rewritten. Neanderthal was highly intellect having even conducted sucessful surgeries. When evolutionary evidence is proven wrong it is buried, ignored, or simply not corrected in the text books.

I began to see the correlations between science and the Bible. When religious fervor and the atheistic science arrogance is ignored and you look at both with a true open mind; then you realize that they are the same, and each actually supports the other. You ask why is science so determine to falsify and misrepresent facts and evidence, which is explained in the Bible. How was the world like in the past can be found in the truthful sciences. Earth is nowhere near as old as predicted, the Super Collider project and evidence in quartz stone shows that quartz could have been created in less then 100th of a second. There is evidence that man and dinosaurs walked the earth together, found in the Bible, and Ica stones from Peru. Dragon mythologizes found in every ancient culture of the world and every continent on the globe. Evolutions has to deny too much, and assume more than it can actually prove. It is full of it's own mythologies and outlandish beliefs. You have to look at all the evidence and rise above the idiots, fools, and tyrants; then open you eyes, mind, and heart so you can fully interpret the information. The real story is amazing if you are able to grasp the complexity of the story. You can not learn new things if your eyes, mind, and heart are closed; because you can never grasp the truth, only what someone tells you should believe.

The more you try to use science to disprove the concept of God, using facts and not lies and myths, the more you find that science not only can not disprove God, but supports intelligent design.

You have to also research the origins of the bible and the books that were excluded by the church because it caused them problems. Truely understand the properties of the complexity of the works. It is the greatest poem ever written, and no other work ever written by man has the properties of the Bible. The prophecies contained within the pages, and the prophetic messages and predictions contained in the Hebrew alphabet letters contained within the individual words themselves (Bible Codes). The Bible may have been written by man but it was inspired by a God.Study the anchant cultures and mythologies of the world and the common threads from shared common memories from our past. It all fits like a great tapestry the story of the first creation which was destroyed by the great flood. We are not progressing, rather we are regressing as a people, and mankind is suffering from an amnesia we just refuse to face.

[Tirong-say]

What if the neanderthal man is just an extinct primate species, there is no genetic evidence whatsoever that it is a part of the missing link between monkeys and human beings, they just deduced their observation through occular investigation.....

[Pein]

pein, dili naman na covered sa darwinian evolution imong claim.. i told you sa abiogenesis naman na.. you are not refuting evolution.. you are refuting abiogenesis theory on the origin of life.. ila-ilaha sa ug tarong imong kalaban bro kay nagpataka na lang ka ug tira..

imong source is biased mismo.. unsa basis sa iyang claim na in despair and majority of evolutionists regard it as illogical and impossible? nag-survey imong source? gi-interview niya tanan evolutionists? statistical data unya bro, ipakita palihug..

pagproduce sa lagi mog life from a single protein to prove your theory. as long as dili mo makaproduce ana, magpabiling THEORY gihapon nang inyo...

The leading mathematicians in the century met with some evolutionary biologists and confronted them with the fact that according to mathematical statistics, the probabilities of a cell or a protein molecule coming into existence were nil. They even constructed a model of a large computer and tried to figure out the possibilities of a cell ever happening. The result was zero possibility! - Wistar Institute, 1966

unsay masulti nimo ani bluedes?

[jamesmusslewhite]

What if the neanderthal man is just an extinct primate species, there is no genetic evidence whatsoever that it is a part of the missing link between monkeys and human beings, they just deduced their observation through occular investigation.....

I think you are right, and he was an intelligent being not a knuckle dragging monkey boy like science has perpetrated him to be.

There is a strange passage in the old Genesis story from the Bible. When Cain kills his brother Able he is outcast with a mark. Cain leaves and goes to the land of Nod where he builds a "CITY." Adam and Eve were from the "Second Creation". So the peoples that occupies a settlement large enough to be called a city, had to be of the "First Creation" I believe the Neanderthal were the First Creation being who perished in the Great flood. Call it the "Theory of the evolution story of two types of man" This is how most theories and myths gets started or created anyway. It is better than many I have heard in the past...

[Pein]

simple answer kaayo pein; They lasted for millions of years with barely a change, even as their relatives went extinct or took different paths across the tree of life. The currents of ecological fate, most creatures adapt — but a few have stuck to their specie.

I'll borrow a study from Dr. Katsuhiko Yoshida, he states that Living fossils are taxonomic groups surviving for a long time without any remarkable morphological change. Most of them retain low taxonomic diversities. Although some of them have survived in refuges to avoid predators and competitors, not all living fossils live in refuges. The survival of these groups, therefore, discussed in the context of biological interaction. I carried out computer simulations of a model food web system, in which each species feeds on others according to its feeding preference. The system evolves via evolution of species. In the simulation, some clades, like "living fossils," survived for a long time with low species diversities. Such clades consisted of species with low evolutionary rates, which result in high predation pressure and intraclade competition for food. Nevertheless, the clades sustainably utilize prey clades and are consequently provided with sufficient food. In addition, because of the low species diversities of the clades, predators of the clades soon become extinct through lack of food. This study strongly suggests that in an evolving food web system, the low evolutionary rates of living fossils allow the long survival of those groups with low taxonomic diversities.

1 Katsuhiko Yoshida. Environmental Biology Division, National Institute for Environmental Studies.

kung tinuod man gani ang evolution, edi wala na unta nang mga mananapa karon nag evolve na unta na sila pila na gud ka million katuig ang nilabay. pero nganong hangtod karon naa paman?

[Pein]

I think you are right, and he was an intelligent being not a knuckle dragging monkey boy like science has perpetrated him to be.

There is a strange passage in the old Genesis story from the Bible. When Cain kills his brother Able he is outcast with a mark. Cain leaves and goes to the land of Nod where he builds a "CITY." Adam and Eve were from the "Second Creation". So the peoples that occupies a settlement large enough to be called a city, had to be of the "First Creation" I believe the Neanderthal were the First Creation being who perished in the Great flood. Call it the "Theory of the evolution story of two types of man" This is how most theories and myths gets started or created anyway. It is better than many I have heard in the past...

unsay masulti nimo sa mga living fossils sir? mu refute ba ni siya sa theory of evolution or dili?

[jamesmusslewhite]

Neanderthal man may not have been stupid

Why Neanderthal man may not have been as stupid as he looks - Science, News - The Independent

NEANDERTHAL MAN MAY HAVE TALKED

Artical New York Times:
NEANDERTHAL MAN MAY HAVE TALKED - The New York Times

Neanderthal May have been Redheads

Artical New York Times:
Neanderthal Bones Make a Case for Redheads - New York Times

All Things Neanderthal

New World Encyclopedia:
Neanderthal - New World Encyclopedia

[Hellblazer 2.1]

learning can still be considered as evolution.

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

For me .... intertwined the story of creation and the theory of evolution . It makes more sense not in debating or who knows more , but realizing what really is going on . By just relying LITERALLY on the story of the creation , it is not enough to conclude and by leaning on the knowledge of evolution is not complete , heck there is even the missing link that existed .

I wish you guys and gals will encounter soon or hear the seminar / orientation about ORGANIC / NATURAL FARMING . Bible and science working together and making sense at all .