
Originally Posted by
tripwire
No need to refute him kebz because he already landed in a 10-year jail time. Hovind's ideas are interesting but what made him easy to refute because he spoke of things that are garbage. What I don't like about him is that he goes telling people to believe God's creation which is only written in the book. But, when he was asked about geological anthropology, he reverts himself to scientific findings that according to this and that... and science observed this... and that... those kind of stuff.
Isn't it ironic why creationists borrow so much scientific discoveries or methods just to prove their theories? Creationists supposed to argue science instead, they use science for their need. That's pathetic.
oh btw, relax! your blood pressure is going up.