ay na lng ta nimo pein.. not to belittle you guys, but taphaw ra kaayo inyong nahibaw-an sa kana inyong gipang contradict sa evolution.. otro pud na si hovind.. lumang tugtugin kaayo na inyong mga complaints..
if only you would learn the physics and chemistry behind the biological studies karon, ma-open jud inyo paghuna2x.. kung mu-tuo ka sa reality sa CSI na salida, its all in the molecular level ang proof sa evolution.. because of Gregor Mendel, who pioneered genetics.. catholic bya to xa.. mutuo bya to xa ug ginoo, pero iyang study mao naka-ingon sa evolution hinuon..
no wonder scientists accept evolution as a fact.. its inherently incorporated in the study of living things..
what i dont get is why you guys are so bent on destroying it and push for a creationism alternative?? that is so hilarious jud.. you cant destroy reality bai.. create your own dreamworld and pretend na creationism gabuhat ana.. otherwise, face the reality of evolution in this universe.. or parehas na lng ka ni Jet Li and travel to multiverse na creationism is the reality (or adto ba kaha ka dimension X kuyog mu shredder ug krang)![]()
actually ma'am, its not that very complicated.. nosebleed lng jud kaau ilang mga terms, pero ang mathematics behind it is *simple*..
the reason why all this has a very strong foundation is basically backed by valid mathematical concepts.. its truly amazing jud.. wa jud ko nagdahum na beautiful kaau ilang basis.. murag nagtan-aw ka salida "a beautiful mind".. daghan lng minds..
anyway, math as a branch of knowledge has a particular characteristic that it always builds upon basic principles and very unlikely na i-destroy nya ang old principles, because even the pythagorean theorem that was true 2000 years ago is still very true today..
now, they have chemistry, physics of atoms and molecules, backed by very valid mathematical equations, and used it in biology to explain a whole lot of other things, which will stand true today as it will stand true in the next 2000 years.. mao na na-accepted na nila ang evolution as a fact.. the only things that will change probably are the interpretation of certain data, but the mathematics used is still the same.. you can interpret data in a number of ways man gud.. subjective na na part.. how evolution goes about is a matter of debate within scientists.. they are racing against each other kinsa maka-una ug truly iron out the details on how evolution goes about..
but as a whole, it is generally agreed that evolution is a fact of life..
beh mga brayt man jud kaha mo, i explain daw ang origin of life. dis a man jud ni nagsugod...cge magsugod ta sa wala. emty space. unya unsa may nahitabo?
eng eng eng...![]()
Last edited by Pein; 09-25-2009 at 12:22 PM.
pagbuhat ug lain thread bro, kay nasaag ka ana imong pangutana dre..
that is not evolution, but abiogenesis --> Abiogenesis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
check out the urey-miller experiment in general biology textbooks..
the EVOLUTION we are talking about here is the origin of species and how they change over time.. if you want to talk about the origin of life and how they come about, daghan pa kaayo topics ana.. naa astrobiology, cosmogenesis, and this abiogenesis..
Last edited by bluedes; 09-25-2009 at 12:58 PM.
lahi na ang evolution inyong gilalisan bro..
creationism and evolution do not belong to the same boxing ring gani.. kay dili na sila parehas ug level.. mao na ang kasugaran complaints sa mga creationists are invalid kay sayop naman daan ilang pagsabot sa evolution..
ana ra ka simple bro..
Similar Threads |
|