Over 160 Professors Refuse to Debate Creationist!

[kebotDiNaMute]

---

the theory of evolution is never absolute.. when you say absolute, it is final and unchangeable.. that's just not it.. the theory of evolution is always open to refutes and corrections.. but so far, hovind has only been trying to advance his agenda of religion in the packaging of creationism.. if he's really concerned about refuting evolution, then he should start conducting experiments that try to disprove evolution.. where are those experiments? is he even a scientist to begin with? in science, if you do not show proof of data or experiments to disprove something, then you're not given any credibility at all.. if u want to play the game, know the rules.. dili kay buhat2x ka ug imong own rules.. the good thing about science and evolution is that the rules are fair and square.. dili manikas na circular logic parehas anang religion and faith doctrine na there's no way for you to win against faith doctrine kay reason cannot win over that man..

show me hovind conducting scientific experiments to disprove evolution, then he is being productive.. otherwise, he is just one very very noisy person who is clamoring for attention para matagaan intawn ug attention iyang creationism "science"

the theory of evolution is never absolute.. when you say absolute, it is final and unchangeable.. that's just not it..
--- well hovind just disproven your evolution claim.

show me hovind conducting scientific experiments to disprove evolution, then he is being productive..
--- well he is testing your method in evolution, and he found out errors 500% error in carbon dating. By the way I don't think hovind can do lab test on evolution, he believes it NEVER HAPPEND AT ALL, and yes he is examining your findings.
--- watch the video, and look at LUCY. Lucy's other limb is a few killometers/miles away...(not sure but its far watch the video) yet they claim it its lucy... hahaha.

Give you a funny situation. I hope its funny.
Goliat: noy teban nag unsa man ka dra?
Teban: ako gipangita ako pitaka.
Goliat: diin man diay na tagak?
Teban: did2 sa unahan...
Goliat: O ngano diri man ka nangita dili man did2?
Teban: Hayag man DIRI, NGIT NGIT MAN NGAD2.

[kebotDiNaMute]

hahahaha! CREDIBILITY wise, Hovind is not believable! Look at his credentials and reasoning? Not based on CRITICAL THINKING!

"reasoning"
--- Nah I don't buy this. So hes findings is wrong because of his reasoning? too bad... PR is different than findings.

"credentials"
--- is science exclusive to those who have ph d? Einstien is a drop out... tsk tsk tsk... dont descriminate brad... must be evolution at work... BAD THINKING is CRITICAL THINKING.

[Malic]

Yes but nobody tells the guy he is DUMB. How was that possible? An audience of the TOP NOTCHED institution, yet nobody wants to stand-up and said, you are WRONG. Does it mean he is RIGHT?

not necessarily.


nobody wants to stand up and tells the guy he is dumb? luckily, Hovind was not in Istorya.net especially here in S&O thread.

[vahnhelsing]

if evolution is real, it will not be criticized that much... it has not really proven anything.
other sciences has proven themselves already though it has be questioned so much before...
but the theory of evolution has never answered all the questions regarding itself...

[kebotDiNaMute]

not necessarily.


nobody wants to stand up and tells the guy he is dumb? luckily, Hovind was not in Istorya.net especially here in S&O thread.

wahahha, ka alegre... well why not, you can do that.. hahah! problema sa ato thinking diri brad, bsta maka bugal bugal nata ok na... tsk tsk tsk...

nobody wants to stand up and tells the guy he is dumb
--- because nobody can find or can prove he is DUMB. dba simple?

isotorya.net is a blog, not an institution of SCIENCE. If you think these people here are smarter than berkeley, aw NO CONTEST NAKO.. hehehe ka alegre.

[bluedes]

the theory of evolution is never absolute.. when you say absolute, it is final and unchangeable.. that's just not it..
--- well hovind just disproven your evolution claim.

huh? nagpakatawa man ka kebz.. ROFL.. hovind's claim is a joke.. don't you know that?

show me hovind conducting scientific experiments to disprove evolution, then he is being productive..
--- well he is testing your method in evolution, and he found out errors 500% error in carbon dating. By the way I don't think hovind can do lab test on evolution, he believes it NEVER HAPPEND AT ALL, and yes he is examining your findings.
--- watch the video, and look at LUCY. Lucy's other limb is a few killometers/miles away...(not sure but its far watch the video) yet they claim it its lucy... hahaha.

err.. sorry, but that's not credible enough.. if you want hovind to be credible, let him do scientific experiments.. let him devise scientific experiments to prove his claim.. where are his scientific papers to begin with?

...
..
.
.
.
.
.

oh wait, creationism man diay iyang claim noh? and those cannot be replicated in scientific experiments.. mao na wala juy credibility si hovind.. the 160 professors dont deal with people who are hogwash in the first place..

mao diay bible ra perme iyang gidala.. bible has no place in a scientific community because the bible is not a scientific book man gani.. ngano magsaag2x man intawn na si hovind sa scientific community kung dili man gani scientific iyang approach...

he's like a person na mamugos mu-enter ug usa ka organization unya magbuot kung unsa ang balaod anang organization.. that's a big sign of an arrogant person..

Give you a funny situation. I hope its funny.
Goliat: noy teban nag unsa man ka dra?
Teban: ako gipangita ako pitaka.
Goliat: diin man diay na tagak?
Teban: did2 sa unahan...
Goliat: O ngano diri man ka nangita dili man did2?
Teban: Hayag man DIRI, NGIT NGIT MAN NGAD2.

and your point in this what??

[brownprose]

In all discipline supporting EVOLUTION, non of them can prove RIGHT.

Lame...an excuse for those who do not know an inch about evolution.

Thats the problem with evolution, because we don't have a better alternative we just settle for a lie...

Only those who don't understand evolution make such statement. When science declares a theory a fact, it means it passes the rigors of the scientific method. Of course, creationists do not know what the scientific method is -- but the scientific community is always forgiving to those who do not know their science like creationists.

and they are well aware of that... Those people who raised their hands have asked a very difficult question. But none of them remain standing...

If you understand your video kebot much less watched the entire video you'd notice Hovind's answers were all stupid. Example...he is willing to offer $2000 if a dog and a banana have a common ancestor. Obviously he doesn't understand what common ancestry means. In other words, Hovind is as stupid as his own example.

FOr the die hard supporters of EVOLUTION, whats your PROOF AGAIN THAT EVO IS TRUE? hahaha, funny...

True for those who understand. But for those who can't, they can always think like Hovind and evangelize Hovind's Delusional Theory: The Origin Of Man from Cow's Dung

[brownprose]

--- is science exclusive to those who have ph d? Einstien is a drop out... tsk tsk tsk... dont descriminate brad... must be evolution at work... BAD THINKING is CRITICAL THINKING.

ANOTHER OF YOUR LIES KEBS? Why do you always have to lie to support your dead cause? FYI Kebs, Albert Einstein attained a degree in physics at ETH Zürich/the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (FIT) in Zurich (Polytechnic School) in 1900. He received a doctorate from the University of Zürich in 1905. Source: Albert Einstein - Biography

[regnauld]

But how come you believe in Dan Brown, hook line and sinker?

I believe in Dan Brown's research as FACTS or NON FICTION and the rest of the novel is FICTION!

Dan Brown has lots of references to back up in terms of investigative journalism!

[jamesmusslewhite]

If he debunk evolution as lie... why not create a theory?

THE HOVIND THEORY

Makes perfect sense, right?

It does if he uses the Theory comprised from the writings of the Bible. He never twist the words of the book, and stands steadfast to it's text, yet science has lied, falsified, and cheated so as to disprove the Bible. Trust the works of the creator, not the Satan's lap dogs.

Hovind uses the Bible, poems written 4,500 years ago (Old Testament) and enrages science, yet they can not actually answer his questions without trying to falsely justify their flawed science theories or just scoffing at him. They can not answer his questions. Why? Because maybe he is correct. I have had arguments with liers and they do the same way, try to prove their lies with more lies, or just scoff back out of anger. That does not make them right or wise, just dangerous.

These members say to debate Hovind is a waste of time, it is if you know he may be right. All the scientist in the world and nobody can actually answer this religious High school teacher's simple questions. You do not find that odd?

God is real and Satan is real, and people better pick their side carefully. That not theory that is just fact, scoff if they like, it does not make them right, just doomed.