Son of Cebu Mayor Makes Death Threats!

[giddyboy]

whoever posted this news or hearsay, i think Osmena fans got a dose of their own medicine here...now u all know how it feels like if we prejudge anybody or preempt anything, isn't it?

crying foul saying this is propaganda, unfair, unjust, pa media unta b4 diri i-post, blah blah blah. well, in case u didn't know, the other side (Garcias) have been the subject of propaganda here too, receiving malicious innuendos, contrived criticisms, and cynical motherhood statements.

we say we cannot blame them to think that way, well, that's why i have been appealing all these time to all of us here to hold our horses, and say things w/ fair play.

and to the thread starter, you better be right on this. coz if it's not, then unrepairable damage has been done already. you already posted the name of the suspect even if this news i think hasn't reached the streamline media i.e. newspaper, tv, radio. i know sometimes internet news spreads faster than any other media available, but we should refrain from posting things that we are not yet sure about.

how sure are you that the cellphone number is from Miguel? did the incident got a police blotter? who are the other witnesses that can be considered unbiased (not Sam or Bea's friends)?

even if what was posted was quite believable (considering the motive) and circumstances pointing to this big possibility (Miguel shooting a cam and making death threats), I am still hoping there is a clearer and accurate explanation from the other side. coz if and only if this is true, then all I can say is "LIKE FATHER, LIKE SON". or perhaps "SON WORSE THAN FATHER"?..."what you sow is what you reap?"

[gikapoy]

personal na nga away
wala na sayang ang tax payers money hehehe

[giddyboy]

personal na nga away
wala na sayang ang tax payers money hehehe

hehe. true.

personal lage but has political (and legal) implications...just like Soc Fernandez' case, di ta kaingon nga sagdi lng ang anak nga tonto...that's not how it works.

we cannot say sagdi lng ky personal nga away. sorry but these people affected are part of the public too that his father has been serving them as constituents. the person allegedly involved belongs to a prominent family of public servants...and u cannot take away that fact.

in the same breadth, do u think if Gwen's daughter will involve herself in an adulterous affair, it cannot affect people's perception on Gwen as a politician, a leader, and a parent? I don't think so.

[gikapoy]

mao jud hehehe
kung dili nata ma uyon sa pulitiko dili na nato botaran sunod election hehehehe

[raski]

whoever posted this news or hearsay, i think Osmena fans got a dose of their own medicine here...now u all know how it feels like if we prejudge anybody or preempt anything, isn't it?

First of all, it's a strawman argument to even equate the two.. the controversies of Gwen Garci which has amounted to almost a billion pesos to the taxpayer, and the alleged rage/outburst/threat.

Secondly, the scandals of Gwen Garci are DIRECTLY linked to her, and it is not even open for discussion that the ink has dried with her signature on the two projects (CICC and Balili).

Lastly, Miguel Osmena is not in politics himself, a more accurate parallel would be the antics of Gwen's daughter, that ugly witch (who no doubt got her face from her mom) who put a Japanese national into jail and used her connection to her powerful mommy to keep him there without recourse to bail as required by our Constitution.

crying foul saying this is propaganda, unfair, unjust, pa media unta b4 diri i-post, blah blah blah. well, in case u didn't know, the other side (Garcias) have been the subject of propaganda here too, receiving malicious innuendos, contrived criticisms, and cynical motherhood statements.

This is just plain retarded. The controversies of the Garcias are all over the newspapers already, even the Garcia propaganda machine known as Sunstar. There is no doubt that if there is any truth to this it will make the headlines at Sunstar in due time, because as everyone knows the Garcias never miss an opportunity to tar their enemies using the very powerful media they control. Unfortunately for them, istorya is here and most istoryans hate the stupid, ugly, arrogant Garcias.

And the fact that you brought the Garcias into this thread shows just how insecure you are about your amos. It's one thing to be a "fan" of the Osmenas or a "fan" of the Garcias but you take it way too far, you defend them in nearly every thread and you even bring them up in threads that have absolutely NOTHING to do with them. If that is meant to show to istoryans how much of a "neutral" or arms-length party you are, then you have failed miserably. Thus far you have not managed to convince a single person here that you are not a pet dog of the Garcias.

we say we cannot blame them to think that way, well, that's why i have been appealing all these time to all of us here to hold our horses, and say things w/ fair play.

Seriously, just shut up people are already sick of you equating mountains to molehills.

and to the thread starter, you better be right on this. coz if it's not, then unrepairable damage has been done already. you already posted the name of the suspect even if this news i think hasn't reached the streamline media i.e. newspaper, tv, radio. i know sometimes internet news spreads faster than any other media available, but we should refrain from posting things that we are not yet sure about.

AHAHAHAHA. I suppose this was written to show that you are a fair man, in that in defending the Osmenas you are merely upholding that favorite line of the Garcias "innocent before proven guilty." This may very well cost the Osmenas, if enough people believe it, then what's the problem? We are not a court of law, we are voters in the political sphere and impressions and beliefs (even beliefs that your amos the Garcias are sick-minded corrupt assholes) are enough. There is no need for evidence beyond reasonable doubt here. This is true in all democracies, either you accept it or you get the hell out of politics it's that simple.

how sure are you that the cellphone number is from Miguel? did the incident got a police blotter? who are the other witnesses that can be considered unbiased (not Sam or Bea's friends)?

Save us your pithey attempts to appear neutral. This was an opportunity you were waiting for to disprove people who are convinced you are a stooge of the Garcias, and you know it.

even if what was posted was quite believable and circumstances pointing to this big possibility (Miguel shooting a cam and making death threats), I am still hoping there is a clearer and accurate explanation from the other side. coz if and only if this is true, then all I can say is "LIKE FATHER, LIKE SON". or perhaps "SON WORSE THAN FATHER"?..."what you sow is what you reap?"

Blah blah blah.

[raski]

hehe. true.

personal lage but has political (and legal) implications...just like Soc Fernandez' case, di ta kaingon nga sagdi lng ang anak nga tonto...that's not how it works.

we cannot say sagdi lng ky personal nga away. sorry but these people affected are part of the public too that his father has been serving them as constituents. the person allegedly involved belongs to a prominent family of public servants...and u cannot take away that fact.

in the same breadth, do u think if Gwen's daughter will involve herself in an adulterous affair, it cannot affect people's perception on Gwen as a politician, a leader, and a parent? I don't think so.

Who would want to have an affair with such an ugly tramp. At least use realistic analogies...

[goryo13]

Di ba si Miguel tua man na sa LA? Gibilin diay sya ni Tomas sa Pinas kay larga man si Tomas ug si Margot sa US? Basin si Guardo nagpusil ana nga camera.

yep i've read it on the news too. part ni sa iyang trip pag adto sa gawas - to visit his son whose studying in the US. another thing, why it took a few days for this to come out but wala may nigawas sa news? something is not right here...

[cebulifer]

news suppresion dayon!

[gikapoy]

yep i've read it on the news too. part ni sa iyang trip pag adto sa gawas - to visit his son whose studying in the US. another thing, why it took a few days for this to come out but wala may nigawas sa news? something is not right here...

agree
abtik baya nang sunstar

[LytSlpr]

crying foul saying this is propaganda, unfair, unjust, pa media unta b4 diri i-post, blah blah blah. well, in case u didn't know, the other side (Garcias) have been the subject of propaganda here too, receiving malicious innuendos, contrived criticisms, and cynical motherhood statements.

well, wala man mo-comment ang mga so called "osmena fans". they let the courts decide and not BRING IT TO CONGRESS for propaganda.

di man sad na grabe nga death threat. naa ko'y mga kaila nga gi-sunog ang boarding house sa uyab, pag balhin sa uyab sa bag-ong boarding house, gibangg-an ang compound gate, then nag-away sa club royale ug rib-o's then nagpapa salba ug duha ka magazine sa .45, then nag-away na sad human giligsan ang papa sa babaye kay di ganahan niya.

college ra gani to at that time to'ng tawhana, di pa gani to anak ug politician. so kini'ng kay Miguel if siya man gani nagbuhat ani, BINATA RA NING STYLA, LISOD PA GYUD I-PROVE.

on a different note, maayo gani wala to daginuta ang anak ni Tita Gwen sa grupo nila Paul Labra sa Yo Latino sa una, "maayo" ra ba kaayo sad na ug reputation sa Ormoc. swerte to si Paolo naa to sa balwarte sa mga Ouano nahitabo nga ally ni Gwen kay kung sa lain pa to, like Davao, Ozamis, Zamboanga or Cotabato for instance, gi-lubong na to'ng bataa ron.

How about Gwen's brother in power that has an alcohol problem, wast tha Byron or Pablo John? and Winston slapping that sexy sales attendant of Linea Uomo?