Religionist enjoys Condeming people. do u think its healthy ?

[cromagnon]

---

do you think religionist who always talks about fire and brimstone to people are considered healthy?


Is indoctrinating people with HELL considered healthy?

its taught in MASS
in bible preachers
in TV

these people always like to confuse people with this fear , emphasizing the bible verses that always talks about problem like second coming.

why not teach positive thinking instead.

what could be the negative effects of this? could this be the reason why followers always end up doing the same thing over again , even after going to church.

[fingolfin]

. yeah, they always preach " you'll burn in hell if you're a sinner". yeah right, tell that to my smoking arse.


.. and most religionist are self-righteous people. They only do the TALK, but not really doing the WORK.

[babypaupau]

i think what's unhealthy is when people are blinded by their faith - literally translating what's in the bible and compromising their lives.

[The_Child]

do you think religionist who always talks about fire and brimstone to people are considered healthy?


Is indoctrinating people with HELL considered healthy?

its taught in MASS
in bible preachers
in TV

these people always like to confuse people with this fear , emphasizing the bible verses that always talks about problem like second coming.

why not teach positive thinking instead.

what could be the negative effects of this? could this be the reason why followers always end up doing the same thing over again , even after going to church.

one must also beg to ask the contrary, does the quasi-rational preaching of many dogmatic atheists, mystics, seculars, also healthy?

they are also shown in TV, in Movies, in Radio, in Print, in Ads.

these people always like to confuse people with this idiocy, half-witted assertions, emphasizing non-existent texts, sometimes existing yet over-interpreted texts, that always talks about how bloated their head could be, and how it could explode any moment without warning.

why not teach positive teaching instead? and by positive i mean, to clamp the pie-hole from defining and edifying statements on regards to topics like God, the Soul and the World, which are things that could never be proven, even with the sick method of thinking employed by many of them.


what could be the negative effects of this? it makes the world a more livable place, i know i want to enjoy my sunday mornings without their banter.

cheers!

[HALIKniHUDAS]

one must also beg to ask the contrary, does the quasi-rational preaching of many dogmatic atheists, mystics, seculars, also healthy?

they are also shown in TV, in Movies, in Radio, in Print, in Ads.

these people always like to confuse people with this idiocy, half-witted assertions, emphasizing non-existent texts, sometimes existing yet over-interpreted texts, that always talks about how bloated their head could be, and how it could explode any moment without warning.

why not teach positive teaching instead? and by positive i mean, to clamp the pie-hole from defining and edifying statements on regards to topics like God, the Soul and the World, which are things that could never be proven, even with the sick method of thinking employed by many of them.


what could be the negative effects of this? it makes the world a more livable place, i know i want to enjoy my sunday mornings without their banter.

cheers!

given a factual event, ang bata mangita jud og justification. mandamay pa og laing pagtoo. yes yes why not teach positive teachings instead of condemning people for not praying the rosary; choosing a pecuilar gender and etc.

ang bata..pls give us a straight answer.

[Egoist]

Naa pud atheist nga fanatic? hehehe

[sanggano_boy]

do you think religionist who always talks about fire and brimstone to people are considered healthy?


Is indoctrinating people with HELL considered healthy?

its taught in MASS
in bible preachers
in TV

these people always like to confuse people with this fear , emphasizing the bible verses that always talks about problem like second coming.

why not teach positive thinking instead.

what could be the negative effects of this? could this be the reason why followers always end up doing the same thing over again , even after going to church.

I've read and watch people "literaly" been to HELL, so wither we like it or not, there is Hell.

I think your the confused bro.

You know whats the common reason why people don't believe in God? They just try to justify everything that they will do is correct!, There just coward in facing reality of reward and punishment.
or They're just afraid of Hell, doing everything to erase it in their conscience cause it's bothering them haunting them like a wild beast day and night? hehehe

Without Hell it's like saying there's no good or evil forces that ever existed. and without this, why bother lying or cheating? Where this good and evil thing grounded if no Hell or no God?

Where is your belief in good and evil grounded?

your response pls.

[Lovely Charm]

one must also beg to ask the contrary, does the quasi-rational preaching of many dogmatic atheists, mystics, seculars, also healthy?

they are also shown in TV, in Movies, in Radio, in Print, in Ads.

these people always like to confuse people with this idiocy, half-witted assertions, emphasizing non-existent texts, sometimes existing yet over-interpreted texts, that always talks about how bloated their head could be, and how it could explode any moment without warning.

why not teach positive teaching instead? and by positive i mean, to clamp the pie-hole from defining and edifying statements on regards to topics like God, the Soul and the World, which are things that could never be proven, even with the sick method of thinking employed by many of them.


what could be the negative effects of this? it makes the world a more livable place, i know i want to enjoy my sunday mornings without their banter.

cheers!

Sir child i luv the last part- teaching positive teaching and,,,,,it makes the world a more livable place,,

so what you are saying pariho lang ang mga theist, atheist, mysticism?
committing the same crime po of indoctrination?

your luv of Catholicism may justify your claim that mysticism, etc is a quasi-rational system, (its like "i luv my own my native land complex") so its understandable,
but in fairness i haven't encountered any teachings in mysticism that forcibly that talks about intolerance against other religion, worst other denomination. they dont scare abouit hell, & reward you of some heaven just to solicit a "good beheavior". they dont talk about hot tempered, jealous god.
Mysticism is all about searching god w/n & not in some far away heaven; now if that doctrine is crazy then so be it, but at least they dont have the doctrine that condemns other faith,
a god that has anger management issue, a god that would send his only son to be murdered to atone other peoples sin? now talking about being rational or quasi-rational,,would it be that the doctrine of the church is the craziest doctrine as compared to the craziness of ateism, mysticism?

in a way your message is clear- pariho lang tayo (religion,atheism,mysticism, etc) my kagaguhan

though let me add,,RELIGION is always at the top of the chart when it comes to craziness,,
ooopps spare buddhism po

[The_Child]

given a factual event, ang bata mangita jud og justification. mandamay pa og laing pagtoo. yes yes why not teach positive teachings instead of condemning people for not praying the rosary; choosing a pecuilar gender and etc.

ang bata..pls give us a straight answer.

you wont recognize a straight answer even if it hits you in the face.

[regnauld]

Sir child i luv the last part- teaching positive teaching and,,,,,it makes the world a more livable place,,

so what you are saying pariho lang ang mga theist, atheist, mysticism?
committing the same crime po of indoctrination?

your luv of Catholicism may justify your claim that mysticism, etc is a quasi-rational system, (its like "i luv my own my native land complex") so its understandable,
but in fairness i haven't encountered any teachings in mysticism that forcibly that talks about intolerance against other religion, worst other denomination. they dont scare abouit hell, & reward you of some heaven just to solicit a "good beheavior". they dont talk about hot tempered, jealous god.
Mysticism is all about searching god w/n & not in some far away heaven; now if that doctrine is crazy then so be it, but at least they dont have the doctrine that condemns other faith,
a god that has anger management issue, a god that would send his only son to be murdered to atone other peoples sin? now talking about being rational or quasi-rational,,would it be that the doctrine of the church is the craziest doctrine as compared to the craziness of ateism, mysticism?

in a way your message is clear- pariho lang tayo (religion,atheism,mysticism, etc) my kagaguhan

though let me add,,RELIGION is always at the top of the chart when it comes to craziness,,
ooopps spare buddhism po

Why do you always use the word kagaguhan Inday Michelle? Just curious lang.
It seems you are "fixated" with the word kagaguhan with other men.