Compatibility of Science and Religion

[kebotDiNaMute]

---

bitaw sab. but kung naay data ang science about sa progress sa evolution then mas katohoan ang science than sa mga sacred books. My reason is, wala may explanation ang mga sacred books kong gionsa pagsogod sa creation. the only thing nga ila ma sotli is an invisible God did it. nga dili ma kita ang process.

"but kung naay data ang science about sa progress sa evolution then mas katohoan ang science"
--- data can be classified as RELIABLE an FAKE. So what data are you talking about? Did you examine those data?

[Jober]

Hahahahahaaa... intawn sad uyamot nimo dong! Thesis is not even classified as a word, it is a term. And, indeed, it has a concept much deeper than what you think. Please be reminded accordingly, I never tried nor attempted to solicit your impression, I may have time with your argument but not with you.



["I mean, everything science owns were already a property of the space and universe ab initio"
--- what does science did not own? ]

Kaluoy sad tawn oy.... a clear sign of intellectual illiteracy. Nakabasa ka sa litra apan wala intawn nimo mabasa uyamot ang lintunganay nga katuyo-an. Kaloy-an unta ikaw sa imong mga anghel nga magbalantay.




["Science had only been experienced by man through discoveries"
--- NOPE, Experience is already there before science. Seasons are already there before SCIENCE. "Brayt unta kulang common sense" tsk tsk tsk.]

Halaaa tawn oyyyyyyy....(unta to experience WAS already there... or seasons WERE already there) sigurado kang naka-eskwela ka dong? Pagtuon sad intawn og "reading comprehension" tawn oy. Akong binisay-on ha, ang kaalam nasinati lamang pinaagi sa kaplag [discoveries]. Kana nagpasabut nga ang diha na ang science, only discoveries came later. Unsay Experience is already there before science? Wala tingali kay salabutan sa imong gipanglituk dong oy.... Giingnan bitaw tika nga science had only been experienced by man through discoveries, di jud tawn ka kasabut. Unsay seasons are already there before science? tsk..tsk..tsk..tsk.. kaluoy sad, wala jud intawn uyamot. Ang science diay maoy mo-experyensya sa gitawag og "seasons". Ayaw pagbinogo dong oy, maulaw ta sa daghang mga magbabasa.



["Klaro nga kining dapita wala nimo mahibaw-i."
--- omg smarter than the 4billion with belief... pft. hahaha!]

Mao ni gitawag og exhibition of your insanity. I never had any presentation of this kind.




["The standard of morality among men during the time human being was still using stone as his prime tools IS ENTIRELY DIFFERENT"
--- have you been there? are you thinking or are you there? seems you know so much about them. Lets not talk morality coz im sure you are low on this category... i hope im wrong.]

Mao ni pinakakusog nimong kinaadman? Intawn sad nimo dodong oy.... Makatawa man sad ko nimo... murag mao na kining higayuna nga moingon kong nagkalas lang tas halangdong oras kun ingon lang diay ani imong ka-ignorante intawn.



["We cannot produce a salad just by simply consolidating religion"
--- well, it depends on how you define salad. Might want to think about what you want to achieve before taking things out into contention.]

Hesus intawn kapobre sa imong paminsar...... I am aware that the metaphor which you used {salad} may refer to the consolidation of science and religion, my assumption is based on your previous line. But one logical thing you essentially missed, dili man gani ma-salad ang one religion with another religion, can you decieve us into thinking that science and religion could be? hahahaaa... perhaps pwede nato salaron ang one science and another science [but not with your ignorance].



[--- parallel universe is considering, a supernatural entity by the way... and everything makes sense if you add this simple ingredient. So what do you think?]

Sorry, I think I have no time with your crap. Supernatural was a term invented by the ancient theologians to give way to their supernatural business, etc. What is not real is never real; what is not within the existence of this natural space and universe is NOTHING for only nothing is composed of nothing. I hope this helps you.

tikayang ang argomento ni kebotdinamute. honong na sir kay masakitan ra ba na siya. i tot ako ra ang nakabantay. daghan man siya og misrepresentations. sakto to nga description " he wants to decieve us into thinking nga mao ni mao na"

[Jober]

"but kung naay data ang science about sa progress sa evolution then mas katohoan ang science"
--- data can be classified as RELIABLE an FAKE. So what data are you talking about? Did you examine those data?

dude, stop hurting yourself. don't make me believe nga you can defend this one. give yourself a break.

sakto si forester. ang imong kinakusgan nga pagsabot kolangon pa gihapon.tanawa ha, naghisgot ba diya ko about classification sa data? kini imong style, toyok toyok,nangita og tsamba ba, itsa then piyong then mag wish nga masolod onta sa ring. tsk tsk...

tan-awa imong style, you asked me a question nga ikaw mismo wala nagabohat. ikaw, na examined ni nimo? hahayz...

[kebotDiNaMute]

Hahahahahaaa... intawn sad uyamot nimo dong! Thesis is not even classified as a word, it is a term. And, indeed, it has a concept much deeper than what you think. Please be reminded accordingly, I never tried nor attempted to solicit your impression, I may have time with your argument but not with you.



["I mean, everything science owns were already a property of the space and universe ab initio"
--- what does science did not own? ]

Kaluoy sad tawn oy.... a clear sign of intellectual illiteracy. Nakabasa ka sa litra apan wala intawn nimo mabasa uyamot ang lintunganay nga katuyo-an. Kaloy-an unta ikaw sa imong mga anghel nga magbalantay.




["Science had only been experienced by man through discoveries"
--- NOPE, Experience is already there before science. Seasons are already there before SCIENCE. "Brayt unta kulang common sense" tsk tsk tsk.]

Halaaa tawn oyyyyyyy....(unta to experience WAS already there... or seasons WERE already there) sigurado kang naka-eskwela ka dong? Pagtuon sad intawn og "reading comprehension" tawn oy. Akong binisay-on ha, ang kaalam nasinati lamang pinaagi sa kaplag [discoveries]. Kana nagpasabut nga ang diha na ang science, only discoveries came later. Unsay Experience is already there before science? Wala tingali kay salabutan sa imong gipanglituk dong oy.... Giingnan bitaw tika nga science had only been experienced by man through discoveries, di jud tawn ka kasabut. Unsay seasons are already there before science? tsk..tsk..tsk..tsk.. kaluoy sad, wala jud intawn uyamot. Ang science diay maoy mo-experyensya sa gitawag og "seasons". Ayaw pagbinogo dong oy, maulaw ta sa daghang mga magbabasa.



["Klaro nga kining dapita wala nimo mahibaw-i."
--- omg smarter than the 4billion with belief... pft. hahaha!]

Mao ni gitawag og exhibition of your insanity. I never had any presentation of this kind.




["The standard of morality among men during the time human being was still using stone as his prime tools IS ENTIRELY DIFFERENT"
--- have you been there? are you thinking or are you there? seems you know so much about them. Lets not talk morality coz im sure you are low on this category... i hope im wrong.]

Mao ni pinakakusog nimong kinaadman? Intawn sad nimo dodong oy.... Makatawa man sad ko nimo... murag mao na kining higayuna nga moingon kong nagkalas lang tas halangdong oras kun ingon lang diay ani imong ka-ignorante intawn.



["We cannot produce a salad just by simply consolidating religion"
--- well, it depends on how you define salad. Might want to think about what you want to achieve before taking things out into contention.]

Hesus intawn kapobre sa imong paminsar...... I am aware that the metaphor which you used {salad} may refer to the consolidation of science and religion, my assumption is based on your previous line. But one logical thing you essentially missed, dili man gani ma-salad ang one religion with another religion, can you decieve us into thinking that science and religion could be? hahahaaa... perhaps pwede nato salaron ang one science and another science [but not with your ignorance].



[--- parallel universe is considering, a supernatural entity by the way... and everything makes sense if you add this simple ingredient. So what do you think?]

Sorry, I think I have no time with your crap. Supernatural was a term invented by the ancient theologians to give way to their supernatural business, etc. What is not real is never real; what is not within the existence of this natural space and universe is NOTHING for only nothing is composed of nothing. I hope this helps you.

Thesis is not even classified as a word
--- THESIS DILI WORD. PATAY! hahaha! ka alegre nmo brad.
WORD = which is the smallest unit of meaning
--- means to represent something.. omg, too much brain... high on drugs?

"a clear sign of intellectual illiteracy"
--- wow as usual daghan storya... walay gi mean... same set of brains... nothing new. Unsa man gani imo gi sulti? hahay!


"ang kaalam nasinati lamang pinaagi sa kaplag [discoveries]."
--- pag sure oi.. hahaha! I tot experience is the best teacher. Teach you why and how... omg... now you have discoveries as the only... ang idiot brad mo 2o nmo bsta dili mo examin sa imong gi yaw yaw.... hmmm.

"can you decieve us into thinking that science and religion could be"
--- sa kadaghan nmo gi sulti brad mao ni meat/MYTH sa imong story? Well take it like this, i found no conflict in my belief and science, except evolution. Mamugos ka na sayop ko? hmmm

yes, natural raman brad na kulang ato kaalam. but the way you project it ambot lang, skeptic lang sah ko... but anyway wala man ka need sa ako ideas right, so why bother asking me? hahaha! common sense brad tells me you are up to something wearing a white robe to show people you are right... well makita ni nato laters... as for now, murag imong gi pang yaw yaw gi pangulba ko...

[kebotDiNaMute]

dude, stop hurting yourself. don't make me believe nga you can defend this one. give yourself a break.

sakto si forester. ang imong kinakusgan nga pagsabot kolangon pa gihapon.tanawa ha, naghisgot ba diya ko about classification sa data? kini imong style, toyok toyok,nangita og tsamba ba, itsa then piyong then mag wish nga masolod onta sa ring. tsk tsk...

tan-awa imong style, you asked me a question nga ikaw mismo wala nagabohat. ikaw, na examined ni nimo? hahayz...

Oi hala the cheering squad is here... hahaha! 2yok? brad, if you will be in the position that you will give your boss a report... you will always think twice if the DATA IS REAL or DATA IS WRONG. Kay ma wrong gani iyang decision based on the report you gave.. aw totyo pod ka... so stop assuming you are digesting info RIGHT.

to poison a RAT you gave him 99% GOOD FOOD, and 1%poison. Hope naka gets ka. Its not the GOOD FOOD I AM AFTER, Its the POISON.

[tarpolano]

there are evidence that evolution happened...
--- if you claim this by heart... congratulation you become a millionaire... im serious.

"man did not come from frogs"
--- worst is we come from nothing that exploded on nothing.

"what ever you say and come up just to discredit evolution has no bearing"
--- oh man, same as creationism. its no bearing... if you dont believe on mine and i dont believe on yours so whats your problem? why do you have an argument?

"try to search for the truth.. It's what your God would want you to do..."
--- well don't tell me i didn't, i usually watch universe episode on History Channel. Stories are good and ballooney. do i have to believe it... well it entertains me.
My God tells me its a lie. Don't use my god to serve your purpose. I don't dictate my god, maybe your god you can...

Are you serious to become a millionaire, you tell me i give you websites that will grant you those amount... but you just cant og in there and tell your story, you need your so-called EVIDENCE if there are... gud luck bro... 10% lang ako tip ba...

seriously dude.. i stated evolution because it's the most apparent example of how religion muddles science by introducing their own brand of theory by way of creationism or ID.

[cromagnon]

fact will be fact regardless of refusal to accept or ignorance.

[chad_tukes]

Proof b, hahay! daghan story... proof dretso kay kapoy mama sangil, in the end pasangil ra japon.. hahah

proof? what kind of effin proof are you looking for?

it's right in front of you! unless you have been sleeping since the day you were born.

[chad_tukes]

so do you think evolution is not a story?

Fairy Tale:
a long time ago in a far away kingdom...
and the frog becomes prince...

Evolution:
over a billions of years, the frog becomes man.

see the similarity... heres the catch.

if the FROG BECOMES MAN in an INSTANT its fairy TALE if it happen between millions of years, its called EVOLUTION.

So what do you think?

just because we don't see evolution happening doesn't mean it's non-existent.

have you heard of fossils?

[kebotDiNaMute]

just because we don't see evolution happening doesn't mean it's non-existent.

have you heard of fossils?

hehehe, too easy.

fossil record are a record that something is dead. It does not represent evolution... tell you what. To find a proof of evolution, you must find the subject and the parent. You see you need this two datas, Parent and child. If parent is a DOG and child is a CAT then thats evolution... right?

One scientist said, its very unfair for them to find a parent of a new Butterfly in a rain Forest, its beyond their capability. How come you are claiming this when the people are doing it can never find it feasible.

Another, a 3000 Years Generation of FLY, 60 years in total was observe, yet never produce a different offspring.

Bro im not saying it never happen, we just cannot believe you because there is no compelling evidence on your claim... If somebody tells taya ani na lotto combination sigurado mo daog ka.. well of course you won't believe... but again you won't win if you dont do it...

POINT BRAD IS: Evolution after 150 years, never had a solid evidence of what it claimed as an EVOLUTION... we only observe changes in KIND. BIG CAT SMALL CAT, Big Dog small Dog... still of the same kind... HERES THE CATCH....
Evolution teaches you not to identify them as kind but SPECIES. Evolution will never mention KIND because its obvious.