Compatibility of Science and Religion

[kebotDiNaMute]

---

I was expecting a more intelligent structure of comparison and soundness of thoughts.

first thesis:
Pseudo-sciences dodong was only considered as science by some people not really educated in science [perhaps like you].

second thesis:
Your statement "science is a branch of knowledge" is totally WRONG. It is not a branch of knowledge, it is a BODY OF KNOWLEDGE. I mean, everything science owns were already a property of the space and universe ab initio. Do not make your own linguistic supposition such as "creation" because it has never been my argument. Ayaw gud pabryt-bryt dong gud.

third thesis:
Science had only been experienced by man through discoveries. Kung wala pa kana, pulos lang unta ka-ignorante ang sulod sa tawhanong panghuna-huna; pulos lang patuo-tuo nga maoy gi-indosar anang relihiyon. Klaro nga kining dapita wala nimo mahibaw-i. Ayaw paghisgut about "morality" dong kay nagpasabut lang nga wa kay nasayran mahitungod niini. The standard of morality among men during the time human being was still using stone as his prime tools IS ENTIRELY DIFFERENT from morality we now knew in this electronic time. Using flash lights in the ancient era may cause your death for heresy and sorcery.

fourth thesis:
We cannot produce a salad just by simply consolidating religion [belief] and science [knowledge], your assumption is defective due to a fallacious similitude. I hope your intelligence can comrehend this simple presentation. Good luck!

Ok mr. smart,

Pseudo-sciences dodong was only considered as science by some people not really educated in
science
--- cold fusion <---- pseudo science and yet you call this not really educated? these are scientists moving in the wrong direction of uncertainty. Don't pull out the plug on them, one day it might be true... Never be certain, science offers temporal truth... ok.

What is pseudoscience?

"I mean, everything science owns were already a property of the space and universe ab initio"
--- what does science did not own?

"Ayaw gud pabryt-bryt dong gud"
--- wow! baryt diay ka? hmmm! we will know as we move on...

"Science had only been experienced by man through discoveries"
--- NOPE, Experience is already there before science. Seasons are already there before SCIENCE. "Brayt unta kulang common sense" tsk tsk tsk.

"Klaro nga kining dapita wala nimo mahibaw-i."
--- omg smarter than the 4billion with belief... pft. hahaha!

"The standard of morality among men during the time human being was still using stone as his prime tools IS ENTIRELY DIFFERENT"
--- have you been there? are you thinking or are you there? seems you know so much about them. Lets not talk morality coz im sure you are low on this category... i hope im wrong.

"We cannot produce a salad just by simply consolidating religion"
--- well, it depends on how you define salad. Might want to think about what you want to achieve before taking things out into contention.

--- parallel universe is considering, a supernatural entity by the way... and everything makes sense if you add this simple ingredient. So what do you think?

Wow WORD "THESIS". Must have a rich vocabulary... doesn't impress me at all.

[Jober]

I was expecting a more intelligent structure of comparison and soundness of thoughts.

first thesis:
Pseudo-sciences dodong was only considered as science by some people not really educated in science [perhaps like you].

second thesis:
Your statement "science is a branch of knowledge" is totally WRONG. It is not a branch of knowledge, it is a BODY OF KNOWLEDGE. I mean, everything science owns were already a property of the space and universe ab initio. Do not make your own linguistic supposition such as "creation" because it has never been my argument. Ayaw gud pabryt-bryt dong gud.

third thesis:
Science had only been experienced by man through discoveries. Kung wala pa kana, pulos lang unta ka-ignorante ang sulod sa tawhanong panghuna-huna; pulos lang patuo-tuo nga maoy gi-indosar anang relihiyon. Klaro nga kining dapita wala nimo mahibaw-i. Ayaw paghisgut about "morality" dong kay nagpasabut lang nga wa kay nasayran mahitungod niini. The standard of morality among men during the time human being was still using stone as his prime tools IS ENTIRELY DIFFERENT from morality we now knew in this electronic time. Using flash lights in the ancient era may cause your death for heresy and sorcery.

fourth thesis:
We cannot produce a salad just by simply consolidating religion [belief] and science [knowledge], your assumption is defective due to a fallacious similitude. I hope your intelligence can comrehend this simple presentation. Good luck!

grounded on soundness.

[Jober]

ka arrogant ni kebotdinamute

"Ayaw gud pabryt-bryt dong gud"
--- wow! baryt diay ka? hmmm! we will know as we move on...


sa pag compare lang nako mas naai depth ang argument ni forester. don't push your luck kebotdinamute,you might end up wearing a jacket.

[tarpolano]

Religion and Science are eternally incompatible. As science deals on what they have observed and then develop theories based on what evidence they have found. While religion on the other hand find ways and means even denying outright physical evidence just to fit the conclusion that their religious texts has stated.

[YLINGAO]

pagka oplok gyud sa mga tubag nimo kebot. basaha gud og balik imong tubag pulos irrelevant
for the sake raman ni imo kebot. pataka lang og pilit og mga tubag nga kinopya. mismo ang kinopya di motakdo sa mga pangutana hahays

Ok mr. smart,

Pseudo-sciences dodong was only considered as science by some people not really educated in
science
--- cold fusion <---- pseudo science and yet you call this not really educated? these are scientists moving in the wrong direction of uncertainty. Don't pull out the plug on them, one day it might be true... Never be certain, science offers temporal truth... ok.

What is pseudoscience?

"I mean, everything science owns were already a property of the space and universe ab initio"
--- what does science did not own?

"Ayaw gud pabryt-bryt dong gud"
--- wow! baryt diay ka? hmmm! we will know as we move on...

"Science had only been experienced by man through discoveries"
--- NOPE, Experience is already there before science. Seasons are already there before SCIENCE. "Brayt unta kulang common sense" tsk tsk tsk.

"Klaro nga kining dapita wala nimo mahibaw-i."
--- omg smarter than the 4billion with belief... pft. hahaha!

"The standard of morality among men during the time human being was still using stone as his prime tools IS ENTIRELY DIFFERENT"
--- have you been there? are you thinking or are you there? seems you know so much about them. Lets not talk morality coz im sure you are low on this category... i hope im wrong.

"We cannot produce a salad just by simply consolidating religion"
--- well, it depends on how you define salad. Might want to think about what you want to achieve before taking things out into contention.

--- parallel universe is considering, a supernatural entity by the way... and everything makes sense if you add this simple ingredient. So what do you think?

Wow WORD "THESIS". Must have a rich vocabulary... doesn't impress me at all.

[kebotDiNaMute]

Religion and Science are eternally incompatible. As science deals on what they have observed and then develop theories based on what evidence they have found. While religion on the other hand find ways and means even denying outright physical evidence just to fit the conclusion that their religious texts has stated.

Proof b, hahay! daghan story... proof dretso kay kapoy mama sangil, in the end pasangil ra japon.. hahah

[kebotDiNaMute]

pagka oplok gyud sa mga tubag nimo kebot. basaha gud og balik imong tubag pulos irrelevant
for the sake raman ni imo kebot. pataka lang og pilit og mga tubag nga kinopya. mismo ang kinopya di motakdo sa mga pangutana hahays

It seems you cannot or never comprehend... its called not FIT. I dont FIT your logic so as you! so don't accuse me of not answering it right, BSIN WALA LANG JUD KA MAKA SABOT. Daghan bya rason nano DILI MAKA SABOT.

Yep, common sense brad, COPY PASTE is the easiest way to make a statement... Information is already there, you don't have to write it for yourself... How come extremely low kaau imo COMMON SENSE BRAD? hmmm...

[flying fish]

@ kebot,

hi Bro Kebs,,il just hope youll find a way to articulate yourself w/o making enemies,
friends doesnt have to follow that youll have uniformities of ideas,,,
& if you dont mind, i am your friend.

[kebotDiNaMute]

@ kebot,

hi Bro Kebs,,il just hope youll find a way to articulate yourself w/o making enemies,
friends doesnt have to follow that youll have uniformities of ideas,,,
& if you dont mind, i am your friend.

Yes fish, same here. But You cannot blame me to be kindl... a lot of people jumped on me, bastos og dili. Point is, Do we have to jump on one another... well kebot is not looking for enemies, kebot is not pushing his ideas, and kebot is not intelligent... but kebot will raise hand and ask questions and will retalliate based on simple truth.

You see fish we know nothing about this world. we can never be certain. Sometimes its taking turns... if people don't believe on what we believe then why insist? well kebot insist to those who insist... if they insult me, well i take turns... sad thing fish is, i expect to be insulted, and im bringing them with me...

[Jober]

pagka oplok gyud sa mga tubag nimo kebot. basaha gud og balik imong tubag pulos irrelevant
for the sake raman ni imo kebot. pataka lang og pilit og mga tubag nga kinopya. mismo ang kinopya di motakdo sa mga pangutana hahays

in an attempt to make his reply more reliable, naglikoylikoy na hinoon. magkatawa si forester ani. basta lang naay ikatobag bahala na.