Compatibility of Science and Religion

[miyay]

---

in other words..man is himself his end..

i believe that man holds the key(science & religion) to open the gates of heaven and the gates of hell.

we agree to disagree then. hahaha

-observed something very funny in this thread, i seemed like a poster girl for religion when i have thrown it in the bin long time ago - -

[Ramini]

much the same, sir? because people do not change? the church started the inquisition and she also the one who ended it.

how did the church ended the inquisition diay miyay?..i hope ang rason dli kai nahutdan na silag mga targets..persecuting the templars was evidence enough even the current pope asked for an apology..or naturukan na silag conscience..hehe!

[tarpolano]

much the same, sir? because people do not change? the church started the inquisition and she also the one who ended it. if the church management learned their lesson, wouldn't you say they are changing their views?

Yes their views changed.. but the doctrine and the bible is still the same.

[Ramini]

i believe that man holds the key(science & religion) to open the gates of heaven and the gates of hell.

we agree to disagree then. hahaha

-observed something very funny in this thread, i seemed like a poster girl for religion when i have thrown it in the bin long time ago - -

cge gd..if imoha na nang gi labay sa una..then dli jd obvious..hehe!

[miyay]

the church did it because it is evolving. do you think the popes of old would have apologized? i think not, sirrah.

cge gd..if imoha na nang gi labay sa una..then dli jd obvious..hehe!

dili diay obvious? have to change my image then. image and labels again, we can't do without them no? we have to be this and not be that

[Ramini]

the church did it because it is evolving. do you think the popes of old would have apologized? i think not, sirrah.



dili diay obvious? have to change my image then. image and labels again, we can't do without them no? we have to be this and not be that

kra na oi..hehe!!

[grovestreet]

If you look back at history, why do you think religion was very successful in coercing their belief systems to the general public? I believe it was the lack of access to information. As we all know the state before was largely influenced by religious institutions. They are mostly responsible for the education of young minds. Therefore they had a monopoly of information, they give the general public a value system that would perpetuate their power. In other words, a very efficient brainwashing propaganda campaign.

But today, we live in the "information age". Information is literally right at your fingertips thanks to the internet. You now have the choice to explore different points of view unlike before.

[kebotDiNaMute]

If you look back at history, why do you think religion was very successful in coercing their belief systems to the general public? I believe it was the lack of access to information. As we all know the state before was largely influenced by religious institutions. They are mostly responsible for the education of young minds. Therefore they had a monopoly of information, they give the general public a value system that would perpetuate their power. In other words, a very efficient brainwashing propaganda campaign.

But today, we live in the "information age". Information is literally right at your fingertips thanks to the internet. You now have the choice to explore different points of view unlike before.

So what's missing with the INTERNET? hehehe! you must be dreaming. Internet spreads information not taught you how to feel. Brad pa tortillas ko ako itlog if you have given you charity to the internet.... point brad Religion is the vessel for compassion, charity, morality and... almost everything that involves emotion. If you are after of knowledge then internet serves you right. But if you make it as a substitute of becoming a human being gud luck brad...

[The_Child]

If you look back at history, why do you think religion was very successful in coercing their belief systems to the general public? I believe it was the lack of access to information. As we all know the state before was largely influenced by religious institutions. They are mostly responsible for the education of young minds. Therefore they had a monopoly of information, they give the general public a value system that would perpetuate their power. In other words, a very efficient brainwashing propaganda campaign.

But today, we live in the "information age". Information is literally right at your fingertips thanks to the internet. You now have the choice to explore different points of view unlike before.

information or misinformation? hehehe. your quite optimistic about the "information age"
the more information is not equal to more knowledge, more like more information, more sublimations, more zombies.

[Ramini]

the state before was largely influenced by religious institutions. They are mostly responsible for the education of young minds. Therefore they had a monopoly of information, they give the general public a value system that would perpetuate their power. In other words, a very efficient brainwashing propaganda campaign.

that's why i have come to realize that it is not good for priests to run schools and universities..

today, we live in the "information age". Information is literally right at your fingertips thanks to the internet. You now have the choice to explore different points of view unlike before.

in some ways you are correct pero i think i have to agree with mr. child here..sakto information at your fingertips pero you really can't verify the truthfulness sa internet..although not all info sa net are incorrect but in my opinion most of them are erroneous..correct ghapon pero naa lang gamay na detail ang sayop or missing and usahay ang mga crucial pa na info ang lacking or erroneous..in some ways i also agree with you when you say.."YOU NOW HAVE THE CHANCE TO EXPLORE DIFFERENT POINTS OF VIEW.."wary lang ta sa veracity sa mga different points of view..para..as mr. child puts it dli mahimong zombie..