I see, so all of us here rely on other people's books and findings and was not able to confirm the information we have been using by ourselves or atleast by a direct/immediate group. Another war on the agreement of who is to be generally agreed upon. *sigh.
hands, may i ask? how are you able to confirm that christian traditions are pre-dating paganic traditions? which direct/immediate group have you been referring your conviction from? please don't be offended, but, won't your statements constitute a state of denial of something historical? won't history books matter to you?
hands, u're wrong
worshiping trinity can be dated way before conception of catholics.
pagans did it first
and you can trace the roots of our religion, it's pagan inspired
Sounds the same for all of us and then we argue as to who amongst the writers are right, while they rest in peace.but I trusted the way they write.![]()
Indeed, indeed, you say that because, as you have stated before, you took it from the books that you have read(as your source), the same as with the others who oppose your idea and is together with your idea. My question was, did each of us(on all sides) was able to confirm that fact(if ever it is) of those books by us or by any immediate person/group?
let's leave it to the evidence kept as reference by the author of the pagan history books.
Similar Threads |
|