Parallel Universe a Science Hypocrisy?

[brownprose]

What are you talking about?

Sorry, I seek a healthy discussion. You don't know what you're talking and now you pretend again to know thermodynamics (as if you understand) when you cannot even explain your thread well.

Looks like since you can't get even with atheists you've turned yourself an all knowing scientist to attack science. so...WHAT'S THE WHOLE POINT OF ALL THESE KEBZ? Aren't you getting sick of doing this the whole time with all these trash talk?

Sorry kebs, I cannot patronize your threads. Just pray that this thread will not get locked/deleted soon. Looks like this is another potential candidate.

Bye.

Since 1tth is mathematically plausible and provable in quantum equation, does it amount to superstition?
--- Nope but creating and believing a superstitious idea that science will take into consideration is not something that science would do. Do you mean science now believe in Ghosts? Spirits?

You cannot say "actually" when you're wrong or are unsure of your ideas. 11th Dimension does not negate the idea of the Big Bang. The collision of branes/dimensions is offered as an alternative model of the Big Bang NOT replacement.
---- Yes bigbang happens everytime. Brad the Idea of Big Bang is to prove there is no Creator. But thermodynamics says you cant without energy. But they just found a hole and said something is leaking from the other dimension. The dimension of Spirits. Oh yea! thermodynamics does not apply because we already got a new source. I hope you are getting this. To make the long story short. Singularity was disproven in less than an hour. And superstition explain even before the big bang... WATCH THE VIDEO NUMBER 5.

Why would such "five principles" (as you call it) oppose the idea of unification?
--- define unifications brad and it will give you one basic principle. NOT FIVE. If you say Oppose, oh yea scientifically speaking its not opposing the equations its just adding more problem than solution.


And yes String and M Theories are basically theories in their current state. It is not superstition because scientist can support their hypothesis and what is so hypocrite about it?
--- a holy feet has touch down on the most basic principle of science. So what's next?

Your explanation is obviously a product of little knowledge about the subject.
--- wag mo ko smolin brad. "LITTLE KNOWLEDGE" lets see how big is your knowledge then, im serious here no trash talk please.

I don't know your motive why you have the boldness to bash scientific subjects when you're obviously inadequate to explain them to begin with. I hope you understand that "Little knowledge is dangerous."
--- im confident brad and it makes sense to me now. Stick on the topic and eyes on the board. Don't talk about me talk about the subject. In adequate? hmmm I was explaining to the very least important about strings... if that conclude your idea think again you might be wrong.

So whats your next argument again... and may I ask you... Do you believe on this 11th Dimension?, because you know what I don't believe it either. But I am going to follow through. I never believed on your BIG BANG and at the moment BigBang seems to be a false expectation. It never happen once it happens everytime. And yea they are claiming all these theories from 1 to 10 dimension if you add superstition they all work well. Is it a killer science?

/kebot sense a faith shaken. So, do you believe in folklore now?

[chad_tukes]

in theory, Science has slowly accepted the idea of another dimension but parallel universe hypothetically includes physics and all other branches of science---even science fiction.

my point is that i don't see the hypocrisy that the TS is trying to point out.

[tripwire]

Kebz, Why not read Dr. Michio Kaku's string theory and M theory. You'll get a ton of information rather than beating the bushes.

[kebotDiNaMute]

What are you talking about?

Sorry, I seek a healthy discussion. You don't know what you're talking and now you pretend again to know thermodynamics (as if you understand) when you cannot even explain your thread well.

Looks like since you can't get even with atheists you've turned yourself an all knowing scientist to attack science. so...WHAT'S THE WHOLE POINT OF ALL THESE KEBZ? Aren't you getting sick of doing this the whole time with all these trash talk?

Sorry kebs, I cannot patronize your threads. Just pray that this thread will not get locked/deleted soon. Looks like this is another potential candidate.

Bye.

hagoy! brad i know there is nothing more you cannot do about it... and there nothing more you can do but wait... lets just wait and see... pretend to know? hagoy, your reply are all about me... sorry brad movie clip number 1 just said science considers superstition because everything make sense. If you want to contest go talk to michio kaku... i bet he don't believe in a being on these parallel universe... sorry brad we both have to sit down and watch them.

[unsay_ngalan_nimo]

well its the best theory that can explain the existence of supernaturals... is this theory accepted by most of the scientific community?

[kebotDiNaMute]

in theory, Science has slowly accepted the idea of another dimension but parallel universe hypothetically includes physics and all other branches of science---even science fiction.

my point is that i don't see the hypocrisy that the TS is trying to point out.

TRYING TO POINT OUT. Well I am asking your opinion i did not imply. But well maybe i am now. Because I could not find a good argument.

---even science fiction.
--- so now you believe in folklore? hahaha, wat an immediate adjustment, but thats nice brad. You are not closing your door. If they find more discoveries I hope you are ready to take the outcome as true. Believing is a different thing right? Theories were not meant to be believed but rather keeping our eye at it. gud luck brad.

[kebotDiNaMute]

well its the best theory that can explain the existence of supernaturals... is this theory accepted by most of the scientific community?

Not yet but if you watch the video. Physicist are considering this findings and that all the dimension result from einstien to string theory all make sense. So the principle is right, but the outcome is different, a totally different way of looking things! It said there is nothing special about the BIG BANG, because it did happen everytime upto today. They disprove the Big Bang in less than an hour, and they were able to go beyond the Big Bang. Comsologist are starting to agree with them... Its a very new, and for your info sis, I remain skeptical. I don't give my cent on theories but I enjoy watching them make up stories.

[kebotDiNaMute]

Kebz, Why not read Dr. Michio Kaku's string theory and M theory. You'll get a ton of information rather than beating the bushes.

trip had i read your Big Bang maybe I am still reading right now, Its outdated already before we know it. in just 5 hours of watching the you tube clips i get an upgrade of info. don't give your book reasons... beating bushes, hey trip i don't believe it either? why should I do that. What I am pointing out is why science going into superstition, and yes its SUPERSTITION watch video number 1...

hagoy trip the good thing about this find is that it is the science i watched the most.... UNIVERSE. Ill keep you posted guys.

[chad_tukes]

TRYING TO POINT OUT. Well I am asking your opinion i did not imply. But well maybe i am now. Because I could not find a good argument.

---even science fiction.
--- so now you believe in folklore? hahaha, wat an immediate adjustment, but thats nice brad. You are not closing your door. If they find more discoveries I hope you are ready to take the outcome as true. Believing is a different thing right? Theories were not meant to be believed but rather keeping our eye at it. gud luck brad.

no, i am not closing my door. and unless some fundie out there can give me solid EVIDENCE to say otherwise, i'll keep QUESTIONING things. just like science, it's all about exploring, theorizing, researching, and even guessing.

science fiction? smell the sarcasm brad.

[Malic]

kebs what are you trying to prove here? im not angry okay...

as ive said...That's how science work...Theory changes as more evidence unfold. but did this theory appear to any Science Journal?