Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 58
  1. #21

    Quote Originally Posted by kebotDiNaMute View Post
    Read the first posts, topic What is 11th Dimension.

    Why the mention of hypocrisy?
    --- In science brad it will be the last idea to talk about superstition. Scientist said they will not allow a holy foot on their doorstep. And Now this 11th dimension is telling you let it come inside because things makes sense.

    Science should not deal with superstition, RIGHT?
    Question. Since 1tth is mathematically plausible and provable in quantum equation, does it amount to superstition?

    Obviously that's not the essence of superstition.

    Quote Originally Posted by kebotDiNaMute View Post
    ACTUALLY THIS 11th Dimension is the BIG BANG KILLER!
    You cannot say "actually" when you're wrong or are unsure of your ideas. 11th Dimension does not negate the idea of the Big Bang. The collision of branes/dimensions is offered as an alternative model of the Big Bang NOT replacement.

    Quote Originally Posted by kebotDiNaMute View Post
    String - is inside quarks.
    Partly correct but too general to explain what string theory in the real sense.

    Quote Originally Posted by kebotDiNaMute View Post
    they come up with five principles wherein it opposes the idea of unification. Which is ONE common principles of Universe. It said for decades they work on it and its not acceptable
    Why would such "five principles" (as you call it) oppose the idea of unification? You're not getting it correctly. The five theories (to correct you) are not opposed to unification. That would be silly. The five theories are all valid and mathematically plausible explanation of physical reality. What puzzles theoretical physicists is which of the five theories provides the nearest explanation thus, M Theory was born.

    Your explanation is obviously a product of little knowledge about the subject.

    Quote Originally Posted by kebotDiNaMute View Post
    . If you want me to picture out what strings are brad. then its a trick. Nobody had ever seen the String not with our current technology. All they presented is a theoritical explanation of strings meaning its on paper.
    Again this is another product of little knowledge. One does not need to see atoms to prove that they exist. Electrons for example cannot be seen but we know they exist because they manifest everyday in our homes.

    And yes String and M Theories are basically theories in their current state. It is not superstition because scientist can support their hypothesis and what is so hypocrite about it?

    I don't know your motive why you have the boldness to bash scientific subjects when you're obviously inadequate to explain them to begin with. I hope you understand that "Little knowledge is dangerous."

    Peace!
    Last edited by brownprose; 07-31-2009 at 06:39 PM.

  2. #22
    There are mountains of evidence on evolution .

    big bang is now dead. gika-on na kay lami.

    now introducing: M theory

    mao nasad nay lalisan.

    in the long run , basi ma-ilisan nasad na.

  3. #23
    if the thread starter is trying to criticize the theory of parallel universes from a religionist's perspective, isn't it obvious who's the hypocrite there?

  4. #24
    You cannot say "actually" when you're wrong or are unsure of your ideas. 11th Dimension does not negate the idea of Big Bang. The collision of branes/dimensions is offered as an alternative model of the Big Bang NOT replacement.
    There is an ocean of branes. now the collision is the cause of bigbang. Thats why kaku said. Our universe is just a bubble in an ocean of bubbles.

    therefore there limitless numbers of multiverse. thats y its called parallel universe. or Hyperverse.

    Science will be an endless adventure.

  5. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by brownprose View Post
    Question. Since 1tth is mathematically plausible and provable in quantum equation, does it amount to superstition?

    Obviously that's not the essence of superstition.



    You cannot say "actually" when you're wrong or are unsure of your ideas. 11th Dimension does not negate the idea of the Big Bang. The collision of branes/dimensions is offered as an alternative model of the Big Bang NOT replacement.



    Partly correct but too general to explain what string theory in the real sense.



    Why would such "five principles" (as you call it) oppose the idea of unification? You're not getting it correctly. The five theories (to correct you) are not opposed to unification. That would be silly. The five theories are all valid and mathematically plausible explanation of physical reality. What puzzles theoretical physicists is which of the five theories provides the nearest explanation thus, M Theory was born.

    Your explanation is obviously a product of little knowledge about the subject.



    Again this is another product of little knowledge. One does not need to see atoms to prove that they exist. Electrons for example cannot be seen but we know they exist because they manifest everyday in our homes.

    And yes String and M Theories are basically theories in their current state. It is not superstition because scientist can support their hypothesis and what is so hypocrite about it?

    I don't know your motive why you have the boldness to bash scientific subjects when you're obviously inadequate to explain them to begin with. I hope you understand that "Little knowledge is dangerous."

    Peace!
    Since 1tth is mathematically plausible and provable in quantum equation, does it amount to superstition?
    --- Nope but creating and believing a superstitious idea that science will take into consideration is not something that science would do. Do you mean science now believe in Ghosts? Spirits?


    You cannot say "actually" when you're wrong or are unsure of your ideas. 11th Dimension does not negate the idea of the Big Bang. The collision of branes/dimensions is offered as an alternative model of the Big Bang NOT replacement.
    ---- Yes bigbang happens everytime. Brad the Idea of Big Bang is to prove there is no Creator. But thermodynamics says you cant without energy. But they just found a hole and said something is leaking from the other dimension. The dimension of Spirits. Oh yea! thermodynamics does not apply because we already got a new source. I hope you are getting this. To make the long story short. Singularity was disproven in less than an hour. And superstition explain even before the big bang... WATCH THE VIDEO NUMBER 5.

    Why would such "five principles" (as you call it) oppose the idea of unification?
    --- define unifications brad and it will give you one basic principle. NOT FIVE. If you say Oppose, oh yea scientifically speaking its not opposing the equations its just adding more problem than solution.


    And yes String and M Theories are basically theories in their current state. It is not superstition because scientist can support their hypothesis and what is so hypocrite about it?
    --- a holy feet has touch down on the most basic principle of science. So what's next?

    Your explanation is obviously a product of little knowledge about the subject.
    --- wag mo ko smolin brad. "LITTLE KNOWLEDGE" lets see how big is your knowledge then, im serious here no trash talk please.

    I don't know your motive why you have the boldness to bash scientific subjects when you're obviously inadequate to explain them to begin with. I hope you understand that "Little knowledge is dangerous."
    --- im confident brad and it makes sense to me now. Stick on the topic and eyes on the board. Don't talk about me talk about the subject. In adequate? hmmm I was explaining to the very least important about strings... if that conclude your idea think again you might be wrong.

    So whats your next argument again... and may I ask you... Do you believe on this 11th Dimension?, because you know what I don't believe it either. But I am going to follow through. I never believed on your BIG BANG and at the moment BigBang seems to be a false expectation. It never happen once it happens everytime. And yea they are claiming all these theories from 1 to 10 dimension if you add superstition they all work well. Is it a killer science?

    /kebot sense a faith shaken. So, do you believe in folklore now?

  6. #26
    mura bitaw pseudo science.. anyway only time can tell.. ingon bitaw nila sa una teleportation is impossible pero possible na baya... at the atomic level nga alng... dili pa pwede sa taw...

  7. #27
    Quote Originally Posted by Hellblazer 2.1 View Post
    if the thread starter is trying to criticize the theory of parallel universes from a religionist's perspective, isn't it obvious who's the hypocrite there?
    Hell you again! Sorry hell you are changing topic. Stick your nose on the screen and make your comments count. I am hypocrite? so be it... it has nothing to do with what I am. Topic has to do with Folklore you never once believe... i think you believe sorry if i mixed up. But then again, the theory you are pushing so hard and believing it by faith is now in the dust bin, disproved in less than an hour. In short BIG BANG is now decommissioned.

    But I got good news for you. M Theory is just a theory anything can happen, I don't believe it either so lets just wait and see.

    FYI: Its all about science not Religion. So dont change topic. Make your Idea count.

  8. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by unsay_ngalan_nimo View Post
    mura bitaw pseudo science.. anyway only time can tell.. ingon bitaw nila sa una teleportation is impossible pero possible na baya... at the atomic level nga alng... dili pa pwede sa taw...
    That is why sis believing on theory is nothing. Its just a theory, a speculation. For one primary reason, to sell BOOKS . Now its all about MONEY $$$$$$$$$$$.

    Its their job to prove it then let them prove it. Believing is different thing.

  9. #29
    C.I.A. regnauld's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    13,099
    Blog Entries
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by kebotDiNaMute View Post
    Hell you again! Sorry hell you are changing topic. Stick your nose on the screen and make your comments count. I am hypocrite? so be it... it has nothing to do with what I am. Topic has to do with Folklore you never once believe... i think you believe sorry if i mixed up. But then again, the theory you are pushing so hard and believing it by faith is now in the dust bin, disproved in less than an hour. In short BIG BANG is now decommissioned.

    But I got good news for you. M Theory is just a theory anything can happen, I don't believe it either so lets just wait and see.

    FYI: Its all about science not Religion. So dont change topic. Make your Idea count.
    Who disproved it? Your pastor with your bible or Stepehn Hawking?

  10. #30
    superstion = killer and waste lots of life

    science + bible/superstion = psuedoscience

    bible + lighter = peace and hapiness

    science + accurate thinking = fullfilment

  11.    Advertisement

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

 
  1. AMA Computer University
    By rocknolds in forum Campus Talk
    Replies: 153
    Last Post: 11-06-2017, 02:33 PM
  2. The X-Men Universe~ Inquiries and Information
    By fingolfin in forum Arts & Literature
    Replies: 255
    Last Post: 11-01-2013, 02:10 PM
  3. Parallel universe
    By cromagnon in forum Science
    Replies: 62
    Last Post: 05-19-2013, 10:22 PM
  4. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 09-06-2012, 01:40 PM
  5. Parallel Universe a Science Hypocrisy?
    By kebotDiNaMute in forum Spirituality & Occult - OLDER
    Replies: 54
    Last Post: 08-01-2009, 02:50 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
about us
We are the first Cebu Online Media.

iSTORYA.NET is Cebu's Biggest, Southern Philippines' Most Active, and the Philippines' Strongest Online Community!
follow us
#top