Parallel Universe a Science Hypocrisy?

[Malic]

---

Well why did you react, i said gani at the moment... yea, it just clearly shows...
its never the BIGBANG an ISSUE. "You are trying to Eliminate something... in your Logic. Well Good Luck!"

si kebs oi...osab ra gud ug basa to ako previous post. it was a sincere question.

moment or not...well, I rather not call it a lie. kay basin naa pod evidence nga mo lean didto balik sa big bang.

no elimination of logic kebs, all we need is a listening ear.

[Malic]

because now u are confused... its ok, u don't have to answer brad, for me I will leave that to you (what rcruman is asking)

ani ni kebs...ingun siya nga naa ba daw beginning ang tanan o ang universe? unsa man pasabot niya anang tanan kebs?

well kung kasabot ka kebs its much better nga imo e explain rather than triggering your toxic side.

[kebotDiNaMute]

ani ni kebs...ingun siya nga naa ba daw beginning ang tanan o ang universe? unsa man pasabot niya anang tanan kebs?

well kung kasabot ka kebs its much better nga imo e explain rather than triggering your toxic side.

Im tired of discussion about the Bible maybe i won't have to explain... What my point is, SCIENCE IS LOOKING ON TO THE SUPERNATURAL because all theory make sense if you add one simple ingredient...
SUPERSTITION.

Wanna ponder on that?

[brownprose]

I don't know what this thread is for and I am not sure if the TS understands fully well the theories propounded here.

[kebotDiNaMute]

I don't know what this thread is for and I am not sure if the TS understands fully well the theories propounded here.

You can ask question... just go for it... I've seen it by the way, and yea maybe i did miss something you might want to ask.

[brownprose]

You can ask question... just go for it... I've seen it by the way, and yea maybe i did miss something you might want to ask.

Please explain to me M Theory in layman's term for the benefit of the readers. Btw, I have a thread in the Science Board about String and M Theories and I am not ashamed to admit that I only know half of it even though I have some books and videos of it and have followed its progress for the last four years. So please explain to us what is the difference of M and String Theories and why the mention of hypocrisy?

[cromagnon]

patay ! ang meow nahimo nag tigre - tigre sa mga mga books.

another athiest propaganda inserted:

Dawkins has written that "there's all the difference in the world between a belief that one is prepared to defend by quoting evidence and logic, and a belief that is supported by nothing more than tradition, authority or revelation

[kebotDiNaMute]

Please explain to me M Theory in layman's term for the benefit of the readers. Btw, I have a thread in the Science Board about String and M Theories and I am not ashamed to admit that I only know half of it even though I have some books and videos of it and have followed its progress for the last four years. So please explain to us what is the difference of M and String Theories and why the mention of hypocrisy?

Read the first posts, topic What is 11th Dimension.

Why the mention of hypocrisy?
--- In science brad it will be the last idea to talk about superstition. Scientist said they will not allow a holy foot on their doorstep. And Now this 11th dimension is telling you let it come inside because things makes sense.

Science should not deal with superstition, RIGHT?

ACTUALLY THIS 11th Dimension is the BIG BANG KILLER!

String - is inside quarks. they come up with five principles wherein it opposes the idea of unification. Which is ONE common principles of Universe. It said for decades they work on it and its not acceptable. If you want me to picture out what strings are brad. then its a trick. Nobody had ever seen the String not with our current technology. All they presented is a theoritical explanation of strings meaning its on paper.

[cromagnon]

ACTUALLY THIS 11th Dimension is the BIG BANG KILLER!

science will always be a killer.

galileo killed aristotle's concept

newton killed galileo's concept of earth

then Einstein killed

now String kills einteins

it was long ago that Darwin killed bible concept.

[kebotDiNaMute]

science will always be a killer.

galileo killed aristotle's concept

newton killed galileo's concept of earth

then Einstein killed

now String kills einteins

it was long ago that Darwin killed bible concept.

"Darwin killed bible"
Did it? You havent proven any circumstances of evolution brad... what you have observed are variations. Storya napod ta BIG BANG? hmmm. So if walay Big Bang? diin diay ta gikan? So again its no satisfactory answer therefore the claim is not fact but pal-PAK!