Question. Since 1tth is mathematically plausible and provable in quantum equation, does it amount to superstition?
Obviously that's not the essence of superstition.
You cannot say "actually" when you're wrong or are unsure of your ideas. 11th Dimension does not negate the idea of the Big Bang. The collision of branes/dimensions is offered as an alternative model of the Big Bang NOT replacement.
Partly correct but too general to explain what string theory in the real sense.
Why would such "five principles" (as you call it) oppose the idea of unification? You're not getting it correctly. The five theories (to correct you) are not opposed to unification. That would be silly. The five theories are all valid and mathematically plausible explanation of physical reality. What puzzles theoretical physicists is which of the five theories provides the nearest explanation thus, M Theory was born.
Your explanation is obviously a product of little knowledge about the subject.
Again this is another product of little knowledge. One does not need to see atoms to prove that they exist. Electrons for example cannot be seen but we know they exist because they manifest everyday in our homes.
And yes String and M Theories are basically theories in their current state. It is not superstition because scientist can support their hypothesis and what is so hypocrite about it?
I don't know your motive why you have the boldness to bash scientific subjects when you're obviously inadequate to explain them to begin with. I hope you understand that "Little knowledge is dangerous."
Peace!




dili pa pwede sa taw...

. Now its all about MONEY $$$$$$$$$$$.