Athiesm vs. Science

[kebotDiNaMute]

---

This guy wants to prove that his God is true by pointing out the weak links in Evolution.

I find this rather funny. Why? Because this kind of endeavor only proves the miscalculated trends and observations in Evolution. No way that it can prove the existence of a God.


watch his reasoning...

Evolution has errors therefore God is True. LOLs

The Africans are not black therefore god is true.

The car got hit therefore God is true.

Eyes on the Board Im talking Athiesm and Science not God... Don't give me your interpretation... you are no where near the point...
"weak links in Evolution"
--- so you did admit its true? is it? brad you know whats the difference between me and RCRUMAN...

He pushes his Religion... on the Otherhand
I am pushing you to stay on the line... so stop claiming you are RIGHT! gets? You guys ddn'nt know what sect i belong to... coz i never advertise mine...
again STAY ON THE LINE.

[The_Jester]

Eyes on the Board Im talking Athiesm and Science not God... Don't give me your interpretation... you are no where near the point...
"weak links in Evolution"
--- so you did admit its true? is it? brad you know whats the difference between me and RCRUMAN...

He pushes his Religion... on the Otherhand
I am pushing you to stay on the line... so stop claiming you are RIGHT! gets? You guys ddn'nt know what sect i belong to... coz i never advertise mine...
again STAY ON THE LINE.

Oh you are the one that needs to focus your eyes.

Its not Atheism AND Science.

my goodness kebs, the discussion started right and you stated something and I gave my rebuttal.

I said this does not prove that God is True. You said something...and i said something.


So whats your point of using Creationist's arguments against Evolution? That Evolution is not true?

My goodness again kebs, Evolution is a work in progress based on Science and not on Myths and Ancient books that you must accept as true w/o proper investigation.

of course there are weak links, but you have to bear in mind that again this is a work in progress.

let me explain...
Creationists before do not accept micro evolution as true until it was proven.

[pnoize]

moderator's note

Learn to respect members of this forum. ANY MEMBER CAUGHT INSULTING OTHER MEMBERS IN THIS FORUM WILL BE AUTOMATICALLY BANNED PERMANENTLY.

[The_Jester]

moderator's note

Learn to respect members of this forum. ANY MEMBER CAUGHT INSULTING OTHER MEMBERS IN THIS FORUM WILL BE AUTOMATICALLY BANNED PERMANENTLY.

...

[seven_segment]

OT: la naa nay note hap...ayaw namo pangigo ug forumer oi...

malo-uy mo...hehehe

[The_Jester]

OT: la naa nay note hap...ayaw namo pangigo ug forumer oi...

malo-uy mo...hehehe

para ni sa tanan sir or naa kay gi specify ani?

[redline]

okies... respect 1 another

[Sinyalan]

Now you pointed it out... and you figure it out.. yea they believe it by FAITH.

You know why there is no evidence on the above mention yet they believe so much... hahaha! So I guess we are standing on the same ground "FAITH".

Kebot, unsa gani to meaning sa FAITH?

If you can define the meaning of faith, then you will know the difference.

[redline]

okies... respect 1 another

pra dli na maigo ang mga forumer user dri mas maau mag-request ta og special section dri nga "debate" sa mga mods pra kng kinsa 2 mga users nga gus2 og debate ky ad2 nalng og wlay rules parihas ba sa house of congress ba bahala og maglinabayay og sapatos ky ok ra as long as gipagawas na imo gibate.

[redline]

or kung dli cla mosugot ky ipa-close nalng ta ni nga section ky dli mn jd malikayan ang lalis gud labi na about religion.. mag-gubat man gani nang mga country basta religion na ang hisgotan kita pa noon.. so much better suggest ta request ko og debate nga section ky naa mn ta balaod sa pinas nga naa tay freedom of speech

so kad2 gus2 mag-debate ad2 ta ngad2 sa debate section.