Why does pure EVOLUTIONIST never won in a debate against CREATIONIST?

[tripwire]

Trip so what do you want? Hey ask ORIGIN dont ask out of the context question... If creationist go out of bounds its called theory a possibility... ok, since you forced me...

you just noticed that now? I already did 4 or 5 posts ago. Evolution explains those questions kebz and I would prefer to hear it from your views. Oh, btw, they have origins [this makes me sound like broken recorder]. If creationists go out of bounds, then prove them... answer those questions, kebz!

https://www.istorya.net/forums/newrep...eply&p=5016833 <----- this are two creationist debate... that supports the evolution after creation... its looks like hovind is off a bit... but they differ on translation... But Creation is still there after evolution...

Kebz, I don't care what they said - what I care is that we are debating. They have their own views and I have mine. Answer the questions!

Lets talk about PANGEA, super continent...

Earthquake said pangea broke down to what it is now 7 continents... its false i think.. why? because the land is not floating water is above land.. when you go down at the bottom of the ocean, its still land meaning earthquake cannot support the floating of pangea... both are theory though no hard evidence to prove...

hahahaha... i'll answer you that question kebz but you have to answer those simple questions first.

I know what pangea or super continent or shifting... don't worry I'll satisfy your queries later.

But first, answer mine... don't ask me questions that you have not answered mine yet.

[kebot]

brad kebz..

na-curious lng ko.. ngano "dangerous" man kaayo ang evolution sa creationism? I'm sure naa mo training on how to answer that.. i just want to know.. is it because if evolution is true, the creation story will be rendered just a story? meaning dili na literal ang story sa genesis chapter 1?

Ok I can answer you why... because both are running backwards on each other. And we need to believe one... You see, in Genesis God Created Vegetation first before sunlight... but evolution said of course its sunlight before vegetation... hahaha! don't make it personal brad... EVOLUTIONIST JUST NEVER WON A DEBATE...

fyi: i never debated those guys.. those were top scholars in their own field... so if you want to ask question about creationism.. better hear it from them ...

sample:

In Mediterranean sea they found a huge deposit of salt burried beaneath the sea... they found it because people made drilling in seek for oil... EVOLUTIONIST jump into the scene and said woa this must be the evidence of evolution that the earth is at least million years old... you see it requires a thousand years to dry up the sea and to fill it up again requires another thousand years even million...

I wont answer how creationist answer it... but I guarantee its TOASTED. you better watch those videos.. it will help your questions solved...

[tripwire]

"Remember kebz, creationism said, all have origins... may it be lightning, earthquakes, typhoons..."
--- any proof on this claims.. you know what trip, the basis for the ORIGINS is the book of GENESIS... now ask me about Genesis I will find it for you... Origin of Lightning? I do not know...

AGAIN, please please please... DO NOT ASK ME MY OWN QUESTIONS! Oh wait, you mean that creationists doesn't know the origins of lightning, earthquakes, typhoons...? OK, the basis in the Genesis book... good! then there is origin... now, I think you can answer my questions this time.

Here is one inconsistencies on EVOLUTION:
Physicist Melvin Cook, Nobel Prize Association medalist found that helium-4 enters our atmosphere from solar wind and radioactive decay of uranium. At present rates our atmosphere would accumulate current helium-4 amounts in less than 10,000 years.

Kebz, I asked you countless times to prove creation story. You haven't done that. Why is that? Now, your evading our debate. I'll answer that questions but you have to answer mine first.

If the Earth were so old, why does Helium 4 tell us otherwise?

hmmm... helium 4, I'll answer you that later but you have to answer mine first... okay?

Trip, does it mean you know more? Trip I did not compete for who is better.. maybe you are! I don't, you told me about those proof of evolution... they are still theory no solid evidence... why are you so frustrated to

Kebz, I don't pretend to know everything [sounds familiar, isn't it? ] and I also not competing either but since you started a thread that you [as creationist] assumes that we can't debate or as you said, can't win a debate. Let's pretend that evolution is false... can you answer my questions now? Because as you have said, evolution is, still a theory. Now, can you answer my questions already?

[bluedes]

Ok I can answer you why... because both are running backwards on each other. And we need to believe one... You see, in Genesis God Created Vegetation first before sunlight... but evolution said of course its sunlight before vegetation... hahaha! don't make it personal brad... EVOLUTIONIST JUST NEVER WON A DEBATE...

fyi: i never debated those guys.. those were top scholars in their own field... so if you want to ask question about creationism.. better hear it from them ...

sample:

In Mediterranean sea they found a huge deposit of salt burried beaneath the sea... they found it because people made drilling in seek for oil... EVOLUTIONIST jump into the scene and said woa this must be the evidence of evolution that the earth is at least million years old... you see it requires a thousand years to dry up the sea and to fill it up again requires another thousand years even million...

I wont answer how creationist answer it... but I guarantee its TOASTED. you better watch those videos.. it will help your questions solved...

i've seen those videos you've posted brad.. unfortunately, its a set-up to make creationism look like its winning.. it's toasted to appeal to ignorant public.

anyway, you already answered my question.. its basically because if evolution is true, then creationism will not be literal anymore as the bible says it. oh well, hold on to your bible lng brad.. make believe it literally happened kung mao jud na imong gusto..

[kebot]

1. can you explain what is a rainbow and why we have rainbows everytime there is/are drizzle(s)?
--- first appeared after the Flood. No Explanation from the BIBLE
Genesis 9:13
I have set my rainbow in the clouds, and it will be the sign of the covenant between me and the earth.

2. can you explain why there is volcano and why there are still growing?
--- no such context in the Bible...

3. can you explain earthquakes?
--- a lot of story in the Bible sorrounding this such as the destruction such as (walls of jericho, The destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, The giving of the Law to Moses... )
No explanation...

4. can you explain thunderstorms and lightnings?
--- no such context in the Bible...

5. can you explain why there are typhoons?
--- no such context in the Bible...

6. can you explain why people have different faces?
--- no such context in the Bible...

My turn... please associate those questions in EVOLUTION. If you have proof much better...

[kebot]

i've seen those videos you've posted brad.. unfortunately, its a set-up to make creationism look like its winning.. it's toasted to appeal to ignorant public.

anyway, you already answered my question.. its basically because if evolution is true, then creationism will not be literal anymore as the bible says it. oh well, hold on to your bible lng brad.. make believe it literally happened kung mao jud na imong gusto..

Im not pushing my idea ... you are... hahaha! then so be it... anymore questions?

[bluedes]

1. can you explain what is a rainbow and why we have rainbows everytime there is/are drizzle(s)?
--- first appeared after the Flood. No Explanation from the BIBLE
Genesis 9:13
I have set my rainbow in the clouds, and it will be the sign of the covenant between me and the earth.

2. can you explain why there is volcano and why there are still growing?
--- no such context in the Bible...

3. can you explain earthquakes?
--- a lot of story in the Bible sorrounding this such as the destruction such as (walls of jericho, The destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, The giving of the Law to Moses... )
No explanation...

4. can you explain thunderstorms and lightnings?
--- no such context in the Bible...

5. can you explain why there are typhoons?
--- no such context in the Bible...

6. can you explain why people have different faces?
--- no such context in the Bible...

My turn... please associate those questions in EVOLUTION. If you have proof much better...

and that is why evolution (science) provides answers for those, because bible has "no such context"

[kebot]

1. can you explain what is a rainbow and why we have rainbows everytime there is/are drizzle(s)?
--- first appeared after the Flood. No Explanation from the BIBLE
Genesis 9:13
I have set my rainbow in the clouds, and it will be the sign of the covenant between me and the earth.

2. can you explain why there is volcano and why there are still growing?
--- no such context in the Bible...

3. can you explain earthquakes?
--- a lot of story in the Bible sorrounding this such as the destruction such as (walls of jericho, The destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, The giving of the Law to Moses... )
No explanation...

4. can you explain thunderstorms and lightnings?
--- no such context in the Bible...

5. can you explain why there are typhoons?
--- no such context in the Bible...

6. can you explain why people have different faces?
--- no such context in the Bible...

My turn... please associate those questions in EVOLUTION. If you have proof much better...

6. can you explain why people have different faces?
--- as observe in his Creation, animals have eyes, ears, nose, arms and legs, fins, feathers, hair.... these are in numbered in millions of its kinds and species but it tells us one thing COMMON DESIGNER.

These are all my personal opinion so I will stand corrected... if anyone contends...

[kebot]

and that is why evolution (science) provides answers for those, because bible has "no such context"

pst show me the relation of evolution to those... I told you brad bible is not about explaining his creation... we only differ in evolution.. associate those... if nothing then evolution cannot answer either... its science who can...

How did it start... from evolution point of view... tanawn nato inyo answer b... ABSOLUTELY EVOLUTION ONLY. Better start from the ORIGIN...

[regnauld]

Theb bible has not yet evolved and it is still the greatest story ever told but not scientific anyway!