"The God Delusion" by Richard Dawkins

[handsoff241]

---

yep. even more irrational than unicorns, dragons, giants, and all sorts of invisible friends. yah?

Genesis 6:4
Job 39:9–12
Jeremiah 9:11

It was meant to be irrational for "thinkers" like you. By nature all faith-based entity is irrational, making it understandable defeats the purpose of faith.
The difference this time, is you are adding more color to the picture.

[Lovely Charm]

wag po, ate :P

depende diay sa pag-gamit og context. lack can be used to mean missing(wala) or deficient(kulang).

ikaw talaga kuya schmuck, MISSING (IS NAWALA) di (WALA),,but sige nalang.
Another question kuya schmuck, since you deny the existence of god based on the rejection of the religions notion about god and not god per se, so am i right in saying that atheism exist because of the god believers? that if with out the theist the Atheist would not exist since your existence is based upon the rejection of the other (theist).
In other words Atheism exist as a consequence of the alleged claim of god believers, that it doesnt exist per se since it has nothing to prove on the first place? am i right po?

[Hellblazer 2.1]

hahaha! go charm go!

[tarpolano]

cge schmuck tubaga si miss gwapa charm.. suportahan taka ya

[schmuck]

ikaw talaga kuya schmuck, MISSING (IS NAWALA) di (WALA),,but sige nalang.
Another question kuya schmuck, since you deny the existence of god based on the rejection of the religions notion about god and not god per se, so am i right in saying that atheism exist because of the god believers? that if with out the theist the Atheist would not exist since your existence is based upon the rejection of the other (theist).
In other words Atheism exist as a consequence of the alleged claim of god believers, that it doesnt exist per se since it has nothing to prove on the first place? am i right po?

missing as nawala? not always baya. Kai what if wala talaga in the first place? Missing pa rin un dili ba? e.g. born with a missing limb etc etc.

Actually, we are all atheists. We are born athiests. Even, every theist is an athiest. For they believe in their god but lack belief in the countless others.
To answer your question, the term athiest, is derived from the addition of 'a'(no), 'theist'(one who believes in the existence of a god or gods )
Alternatively, athiesm is from 'a'(no), and 'theism'(belief in god)

So technically, the term athiest would not exist if there are no theists. BUT, if there are no theists, all would be atheists.

edit: gwapa na si charm? Hi charm

[handsoff241]

As I have said earlier, we are all atheist with respect to each other.

[handsoff241]

@schmuck and hell, kung mo-tira mo anang charm dali-e ninyo, si reg naa nay visitor's message

amawa jud aning reg oi pa hilom-hilom ra man

[Lovely Charm]

[quote=schmuck;4939890]missing as nawala? not always baya. Kai what if wala talaga in the first place? Missing pa rin un dili ba? e.g. born with a missing limb etc etc.

Actually, we are all atheists. We are born athiests. Even, every theist is an athiest. For they believe in their god but lack belief in the countless others.
To answer your question, the term athiest, is derived from the addition of 'a'(no), 'theist'(one who believes in the existence of a god or gods )
Alternatively, athiesm is from 'a'(no), and 'theism'(belief in god)
So technically, the term athiest would not exist if there are no theists. BUT, if there are no theists, all would be atheists.




Ha? parang conflicting to na statement kuya schmuck
How can atheism exist if on the first place they have no theist to reject
di ba you exist because of the other? so w/o the other you dont have brand name as well,
Sa tingin ko if theres no theist wala ding atheist

[schmuck]

Ha? parang conflicting to na statement kuya schmuck
How can atheism exist if on the first place they have no theist to reject
di ba you exist because of the other? so w/o the other you dont have brand name as well,
Sa tingin ko if theres no theist wala ding atheist

see, ganito yan, if there are no theists, meaning lahat nang tao di naniniwala sa mga gods, the term "athiest" would not exist. They wouldn't know that they are athiests. BUT, technically, since di naniniwala sa mga gods, atheists sila.

analogy:
Suppose that you are an African person. Suppose further, that your village is secluded, that all your life you've never been outside your village, and never seen other people from other places.
In this scenario, would you know that you are "black"(in terms of race)?
The term "black"(for race) would not exist. BUT technically, since you're skin is black, then you ARE black. You just don't know it.

sabotable ba Lovely charm?