Do you support women as priests?

[butitoy]

---

If men can do bad things, women can do worst also.

nobody's exempted

[romano2717]

exactly! there's no difference, anyway the same "six cornered concrete cement ideas, with hardbound re-bars" teachings are all presented. mag IMAGINE nlng ta. no priest, no priestess.

[dartzed]

what's really the difference of woman being priestess and man being priest..

actually thats not the real issue.. for some reason y RCC dont allow woman as priest it's because they are just following what God was doing b4.. if God allow it pa unta why would not he choose women to do apostles works at the 1st place..

[NapoleonBlownapart]

ooo.. mao d.i.. naa pud punto ang RCC oi

[dartzed]

kani jud ang tao hilig jud ni sila ug buot-buot..hehehe

[tripwire]

XES is a basic need.
Correct me if I'm wrong.

Nope, a responsibility.

[tripwire]

actually thats not the real issue.. for some reason y RCC dont allow woman as priest it's because they are just following what God was doing b4.. if God allow it pa unta why would not he choose women to do apostles works at the 1st place..

You mean, traditions. Because that's what RCC is following/practicing. My question [again], if God allows equality towards women... why can't RCC or other religions follow what had been told? If the church respect women as humans, why can't they pursue what they love to do? Then if the church does not allow it... I think there is a big gap between religion [God] and women. Imagine if we all women don't like men to impregnate us? Hmmmm?

[regnauld]

@Carmicaeld, explain it gently and meekly... remember the beatitudes.

OT: pa beautitudes 2x pa! pan chicks diay toh!

[NASYO]

suppressing it as a way of becoming a saint.

OK, OK, OK

enough for the suppression.
can they exclude themselves from earthly needs and temptations?

they will answer, "Tawo ra man sad mi, dili perpekto, masayop ug matintal sad.."

they would rather go amputate their loaded guns.

[NASYO]

Nope, a responsibility.

YEP, a need