Oneness: Great Priniciples Shared by All Religions

[regnauld]

So example naay president/CEO sa usa ka company nya all over the world naa silay planta nga the same pud ang product, puede diay lahilahi ang standards nga iya ipatuman sa matag planta nya in the same time pareha gihapon og output?

dili rason nga usa ra ato planet mao nga usa ra ato GOD or GOD is one.

Kini ang buhata kung gusto lang nimo total maestro man ka.
Himo og excel file or table nga imo i-butang ang mga characteristics sa tanang GINOO sa matag religion/church.

tan-awa kung pareha ba or magkamatch ba.

their doctrine is for their own purpose and satisfaction while the bible is for the purpose of GOD.

Peace!

Kung imong Anthropomorphic GOD ang hisgutan pwede ang imong GOD mahimong CEO pero ang GOD who is THE GOD ALL IN ALL dili man pwedeng mahimong CEO. Ikaw nalang ang mag CEO. Ang standards nimo kay man made ra na. Imong basis kay bible and that is not universal because that is doctrinal and not the ESSENCE of GOD. Do you know the meaning of ESSENCE? that is your homewrork and assignment manoy!

Unsa man diay gusto nimo mahitabo? Walay ONENESS ug imong gusto kay DIVISION? kay gusto nimo ang imo ray tumanon nga ginoo nga Jealous GOD? hehehe ka alegre sa ADD!

I think you you are paranoid to your Anthropomorphic GOD Rcruman!

[regnauld]

bisag unsaon Reg...di jud ko kasabot...

God is a jealous God, siya ra jud...

kung mu-ingon kag God is One who is all in all...forgive me...

Buddhism, Hinduism and Islam cannot possibly all be part of God - for that would make God a being with the mother of all cases of split personality disorder - with myriad contradictory attributes and no essential truth or being. God is not a God of contradictions.

This is the priniciple of Gestalt Psychology!

The WHOLE (GOD/TRUTH) is greater than the sum of its parts (RELIGIONS)!

[orlyboy78]

walay word sa nga oneness sa bible....ang naa s holiness....one God.....wla jud oneness yaw boot ug ky pangitaan nya ka sa u oneness wla ka ipakita

[regnauld]

walay word sa nga oneness sa bible....ang naa s holiness....one God.....wla jud oneness yaw boot ug ky pangitaan nya ka sa u oneness wla ka ipakita

Kanang UNITY dili ba na siya component sa ONENESS?

Naa sa bible brad. Jesus The Christ said: "I PRAY THAT THEY ALL MAY BE ONE"

John 17:22 NKJV) "And the glory which You gave Me I have given them, that they may be one just as We are one:

Kana dili na ONENESS? Unsa mana siya TWONESS nga maka cause ug DIVISION?"

[st.anthony]

Kanang UNITY dili ba na siya component sa ONENESS?

Naa sa bible brad. Jesus The Christ said: "I PRAY THAT THEY ALL MAY BE ONE"

John 17:22 NKJV) "And the glory which You gave Me I have given them, that they may be one just as We are one:

Kana dili na ONENESS? Unsa mana siya TWONESS nga maka cause ug DIVISION?"

Your maybe right that HE prayed that all maybe one but thats not what he came for!

LUKE 12:49-53

49 ‘I came to bring fire to the earth, and how I wish it were already kindled! 50I have a baptism with which to be baptized, and what stress I am under until it is completed! 51Do you think that I have come to bring peace to the earth? No, I tell you, but rather division! 52From now on, five in one household will be divided, three against two and two against three; 53they will be divided:

[regnauld]

Your maybe right that HE prayed that all maybe one but thats not what he came for!

LUKE 12:49-53

49 ‘I came to bring fire to the earth, and how I wish it were already kindled! 50I have a baptism with which to be baptized, and what stress I am under until it is completed! 51Do you think that I have come to bring peace to the earth? No, I tell you, but rather division! 52From now on, five in one household will be divided, three against two and two against three; 53they will be divided:

I came here not to bring peace but division is PARADOXICAL in nature! You can only have PEACE if you know how to preapre for WAR! As it has been said, if you want PEACE, then prepare for WAR and if you want WAR, then prepare for PEACE!

[Hellblazer 2.1]

for me, personally, i really think unity is very hard to achieve. with the differences that we have today, i think it's near to impossibility to achieve unity. BUT, i do believe we can live in HARMONY. we can be in harmony with each other while maintaining our individual differences but cemented with RESPECT. i think that should be the key to Oneness (which could come in later).

think of a church choir. not everyone has the same type of voice. but if you BLEND each different voice, i think you may be able to harmonize it to produce the most sweet hearing music.

[st.anthony]

for me, personally, i really think unity is very hard to achieve. with the differences that we have today, i think it's near to impossibility to achieve unity. BUT, i do believe we can live in HARMONY. we can be in harmony with each other while maintaining our individual differences but cemented with RESPECT. i think that should be the key to Oneness (which could come in later).

think of a church choir. not everyone has the same type of voice. but if you BLEND each different voice, i think you may be able to harmonize it to produce the most sweet hearing music.

Bravo, Bravo thats a very perfect example and a perfect idea

[regnauld]

^ That's why if you read and study carefully this thread it says: ONENESS: PRINCIPLES SHARED BY ALL RELIGIONS and not DOCTRINES or CATMATIC I mean DOGMATIC BELIEFS of each religion!

[Hellblazer 2.1]

Bravo, Bravo thats a very perfect example and a perfect idea

thank you, tonio. actually, there really is no reason for us to argue here. while you have your dogmas to follow and uphold, some of us found a rather deeper meaning behind each symbology you hold as tradition. i honestly should not blame you for believing in the teachings of the church, and i'm asking you to do the same not to blame a select few of us if we do find a rather esoteric meaning behind the teachings. afterall, we all want to find meaning to what life's purpose is. so we might as well respect each other. right, tonio?