Arroyo allies plan Con-ass next month

[outfit49bestever]

---

oh, you've been watching too much NBN. no wonder you've been brainwashed. you don't have to watch the TV news. you just need to feel what is happening around.

...so what you're saying that Manila is Philippines?unsa na diay happening diri esp Cebu?naa diay?kung naa man gani, daghan ba?!

i beg to disagree that NBN is biased.xur oie!la pani ka kita.ang popular channel man imu gtanAw!remember the what is popular is not always right!duh

[unsay_ngalan_nimo]

wala man perfec na susem oi... evrybody is saying centralized ra kayyo ang government hello naa baya LGUs... LGUs are even able to have theri own business deals even without a go siganal from the malacañang..

if we want more autonomy no need to change the constituion as a whole.. we can revise the LGU code if we want to...

we wnat federalism naa man sad loophole ang fedalism... dgahan man politcal dynasties diri sa pilipnas... fedaralism will only strengthen that...

kung kamo apil anang mga naa sa taas daan ug naghold daan ug position nindot gyud nang fedaralism... kamo na gud tag-iya sa lugar parehas ra na ni radaza sa lapu-lapu a sila ra sa iya misis magpuli-puli sa position...

no need i-overhaul ang consti pwede raman revision... start daw mo pangita sa nindot ia revised sa consti...

[outfit49bestever]

wala man perfec na susem oi... evrybody is saying centralized ra kayyo ang government hello naa baya LGUs... LGUs are even able to have theri own business deals even without a go siganal from the malacañang..

if we want more autonomy no need to change the constituion as a whole.. we can revise the LGU code if we want to...

we wnat federalism naa man sad loophole ang fedalism... dgahan man politcal dynasties diri sa pilipnas... fedaralism will only strengthen that...

kung kamo apil anang mga naa sa taas daan ug naghold daan ug position nindot gyud nang fedaralism... kamo na gud tag-iya sa lugar parehas ra na ni radaza sa lapu-lapu a sila ra sa iya misis magpuli-puli sa position...

no need i-overhaul ang consti pwede raman revision... start daw mo pangita sa nindot ia revised sa consti...

if what you're saying revisions, wala ghapon na...kay ang system man GIHAPON ang magdictate...last i posted that, the three powers of the state (Executive, Legislative, Judicial) are vested on three different bodies.among the three, the first are always at gridlock!there is no coordination of policies that is reforms (most of them) are not realized. why? because each of the bodies are INDEPENDENT from one another and they look each others back. sad to say, the latter, is always happening..kung unsay apan sa usa, i.investigate sa usa.,vice versa.

why not change the system.another benefit sad is that ang ato parties will be program oriented!wala mana sila gamit sa karon!sa rally nuon!hahayz...if you have read the PRIMER for CHACHA..,pls read on and be educated.

WHY CHANGE OUR PRESIDENTIAL GOVERNMENT
TO A PARLIAMENTARY GOVERNMENT?
A P R I M E R
By Jose V. Abueva
Chairman of the Consultative Commission
President of Kalayaan College at Riverbanks, Marikina
U.P. Professor Emeritus of Political Science and Public Administration
November 19, 2005
I. Introduction.
1. Since 1946 when we regained our independence from the United States, our government
has been presidential in form and unitary and highly centralized in structure.
2. In the presidential form of government, legislative power is vested in Congress (Senate
and House of Representatives), executive power in the President, and judicial power in
the Supreme Court and lower courts. This form of government is based on the principle
of “separation of powers and checks and balance” among the three branches of
government.
3. However, during the authoritarian (dictatorial) rule from September 1972 to February
1986, Ferdinand Marcos exercised executive and legislative powers in a pseudo
parliamentary government, and controlled the whole judiciary and the media. He
governed with the military and national police. The people lost their political freedom
and civil rights.
4. After the EDSA revolt which ended the dictatorship, democracy was restored under the
1987 Constitution. This included the presidential form of government and the unitary
structure where power, authority and revenues are concentrated in the national
government. Most local governments are weak and dependent on the national
government.
5. Eighteen years since we restored our democracy—with its presidential form and unitary
structure—we have failed to check our problems of poverty, unemployment, social
injustice, corruption, rebellion, inadequate education, health, housing, and so on. So
many of our people have to go abroad to find jobs and support their families.
6. Our government always lacks funds and is heavily in debt from too much borrowing. We
are in deep trouble financially although new taxes and fiscal reforms have been initiated.
7. Our people are very dissatisfied with the way our democracy works. Taking advantage of
our political instability and economic problems, some groups are proposing undemocratic
and authoritarian alternatives to our system of government thus putting our constitutional
democracy and future as a nation at great risk.
8. We fully realize the weakness and ineffectiveness of our political institutions in solving
our problems and meeting our challenges. For this reason we are proposing their reform
and modernization by revising our Constitution and other ways. We are proposing
changing our presidential government to a parliamentary government, and our highly
centralized unitary structure to a decentralized structure of autonomous local
governments and regions preparatory to a shift to a federal republic.

II. What is wrong with our present presidential government? Or why do we want to change
it?
1. Separation of the executive power of the President and the legislative power of Congress
(the Senate and the House of Representatives) causes intense rivalry and competition for
power among them in a system that has turned very adversarial. Especially because, like
the President, the 24 senators are elected nationwide.
2. Constant conflict and even gridlock among the President and the House and the Senate,
and too many congressional investigations of executive policies and actions, delay and
obstruct legislation. In this system it is difficult to institute reforms.
3. Because our political parties are weak, undemocratic, unstable, and not programoriented,
our leaders and political parties cannot be held responsible and
accountable to the people. With power diffused and the leadership fragmented, in
our presidential form of government it is difficult to know who are responsible
and accountable for the quality of national governance.
4. Because of the power of the media and cinema, candidates for President and the Senate
are increasingly being selected mainly for their personal popularity or “win-ability” and
wealth rather than political leadership. This has resulted in the deterioration in the quality
of our nationally elected leaders.
5. Our presidential government is unstable because the President may want to extend his
fixed term of office by amending the Constitution (Manuel L. Quezon in 1940; President
Fidel V. Ramos in 1996), or by martial law (Ferdinand Marcos in 1972).
6. It is unstable because of the resort to “people power” and military intervention in
removing an incumbent President when impeachment fails (Joseph Estrada in 2001).
7. Rising cost of elections, especially national elections of the President and senators,
corrupt the system. It also takes too long to determine the results of nationwide elections.
With the high stakes involved in politics and widespread poverty, vote-buying is rampant
and cheating is not uncommon.

III. What kind of parliamentary government is being proposed ?
1. A unicameral Parliament in which legislative and executive powers are vested.
2. Most Members of Parliament (MPs) shall be elected in parliamentary districts (starting
with the present congressional districts).
3. Thirty percent of all the MPs shall be chosen by proportional representation of the
political parties according to their share of the total party votes in the previous
parliamentary election. The political parties shall ensure the proper representation of the
labor, peasant, urban poor, veterans, indigenous peoples, women, youth, differentlyabled,
and other such sectors.
4. Parliament elects the Prime Minister who exercises the executive power with the
assistance of the Cabinet, and the President who is the head of State.
5. The Prime Minister is normally the leader of the majority party in the Parliament. The
Prime Minister and the Cabinet shall be responsible to the Parliament for the program of
government and shall determine the guidelines of national policy.

IV. Why do we want a parliamentary government? What are its expected advantages over
our traditional presidential government?
1. In a parliamentary government, Parliament exercises both legislative power and
executive power. Parliament will therefore ensure the coordinated, efficient and effective
exercise of legislative and executive powers—the making of laws and policies and their
implementation. Especially if we have a unicameral parliament (only one house or
chamber).
2. At the same time the majority party in Parliament is checked by the major opposition
party, helped by other minority parties, and other centers of power in the community—
the media, interest groups, and religious and civil society organizations. The major
opposition party has a “shadow Cabinet” to check on the Cabinet and is prepared to take
over when necessary.
3. The Prime Minister and the Government (the governing party headed by the Prime
Minister) assume collective responsibility and accountability to the Parliament and the
people for governance.
The people will therefore know whom to reward for good governance and administration,
or punish for failure and corruption.
4. Parliamentary government is more likely to ensure the election of the head of government
—the Prime Minister—for his leadership and experience in the party and in the public
service, as known to party members.
5. It will help prevent election of the head of government on the basis largely of wealth,
personal popularity, or “win-ability,” not on proven competence and experience as a
leader.
6. It will be easier to change the head of government and the ruling party whenever it
becomes necessary, by a vote of no confidence in Parliament. No need for impeachment,
people power revolts, and military intervention that cause political instability, disrupt the
economy, discourage foreign investors, and hurt the people, especially the poor.
7. Unlike in our presidential government where the President is both head of government
and head of state, the function of head of state is assigned to a ceremonial President
elected by the Parliament. This will lighten the burden on the Prime Minister who can
concentrate on governance. At the same time the President, who symbolizes the people’s
sovereignty and national unity, can be a rallying point as a leader who is above partisan
politics.
8. Parliamentary government and electoral reform will empower the people to choose not
only the candidates for the Parliament but also the political party they want to govern the
country and the regional and local governments.
9. Parliamentary government will help us develop political parties that are democratic,
disciplined, united, and effective in making and carrying out a program of government
that can secure popular support. It will encourage the formation of a stable two-party
system.
10. The people elect the members of Parliament among candidates in parliamentary districts
and also by proportional representation of the rival political parties in the parliamentary
election. It will be easier and faster and less costly to administer elections and proclaim
the winning candidates.
11. It will reduce the high cost of electing the head of government, by choosing the leader of
the majority party (or coalition) in Parliament as Prime Minister.
12. The selection of additional members of Parliament through proportional representation of
the political parties will allow the leading political party to select competent leaders
(among professionals, business leaders, scholars, and sectoral representatives) to serve in
Parliament and the Cabinet. These would leaders who are not willing to run for public
office.
13. Parliamentary government can lead to continuity in policy and administration if the
majority party or coalition governs well and the people are satisfied, because the people
will learn to reward or punish the ruling party for its success or failure in governance.
The people will know that the ruling party, not just individual leaders, is responsible and
accountable for the government’s performance.
**********
Most stable and progressive countries in the world have a parliamentary government. T hese
include Japan, Canada, Australia, United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, Spain, Norway, Sweden, and
also India, Singapore, and Malaysia in Asia.
In sum, a parliamentary government will help us to have “good governance”: ang mabuti at
mabisang pamamalakad ng ating gobyerno at bayan.
Charter change to a parliamentary government, along with decentralization and devolution
of powers to the regional and local governments and eventually Federalism, will enable us,
Filipinos, to respond more efficiently and effectively to our problems, meet our challenges,
achieve our goals as a nation, and compete in the global economy.
Charter change to a parliamentary government and autonomous local and regional
governments will help us to reduce poverty and corruption. It will empower us to achieve
the peace, prosperity, justice and security we all want for ourselves and our children.
Government will be better able to help in attracting investments, creating more jobs, raising
incomes, providing better education, health, welfare, and security to our people. And we
can build and maintain more schools, hospitals, waterworks, roads, bridges, seaports and
airports. Especially when we remove unnecessary restrictions on foreign investments in our
country under safeguards to be provided by law.

[cdburgh]

...so what you're saying that Manila is Philippines?unsa na diay happening diri esp Cebu?naa diay?kung naa man gani, daghan ba?!

i beg to disagree that NBN is biased.xur oie!la pani ka kita.ang popular channel man imu gtanAw!remember the what is popular is not always right!duh

bro, did i say that Manila is Philippines? pataka ka lang.
are you even sure i watch ans-cbn? wala man gani ka kahibalo kung naa ko TV? you assume too much.

before you educate me with "what is popular is not always right" thingy, make sure that you yourself have no biases.

[outfit49bestever]

bro, did i say that Manila is Philippines? pataka ka lang.
are you even sure i watch ans-cbn? wala man gani ka kahibalo kung naa ko TV? you assume too much.

before you educate me with "what is popular is not always right" thingy, make sure that you yourself have no biases.

asa man diay ka ga.basi bro sa imu g.state "you just need to feel what is happening around."?asa mana na "around"?around your boarding house?dili man guro

ikaw ra makatubag bro if gatanAw ka ug tv, minaw sa radio, basa newspaper, chikka sa friends, etc..

mao ba bro..ikaw ra guro bias oie..if wala jud ka media sources (tv, radio, etc) then panig man lagi ka direcho sa ni.against?la gani ka kabalo unsa g.batihan?hahayz..pasabta..maypa ko, nakabasa ta sa other side of the coin...at least i know where to stand and ITS MY DECISION...ikaw?nakahibalo naka?ni.effort ka ug sabot sa pikas?or bias jud ka?

[tilabotoraul]

i believe some are masking their identity for a newbie account....

chacha is not the answer..federal system is.

if cebu woul;d file a referendum for a separate government. i would really line up to sign or vote.

and leave the pesky crook elitist manila government rot in their system

and leave us visayas ( specially CEBU ) and minadanao take care of out selves.

tan-awon ta lang kinsay mapasmo!

cebuanos dont need anything from the central government.

we are a lot of skilled and talented workforce here

we earn our bread here..we pay our hard earned taxes here.

and yet our basic services from the central government are not met.

because we send our taxes paid to manila for them to corrupt!

manila is the leech to this whole archipelago! manila leave us alone! We want justice to the provinces! i mean now!

[Luskan]

and the ones who proposed the con-ass are not confused?

The people who proposed con-ass are not confused. That statement is incoherent because why would they would propose con-ass if there is no reason behind it?

[Luskan]

(oops double post)

[Luskan]

ka lols pud nimo oi... so what mo broadcast silag impeachment hearings?mata na dong!

That's not my point, What I'm trying to say is that they should portray both good and bad from the admin.

[tatakalz]

naunsa naman ni cla oi.....giuna lng jud nila ilang pagkabutang,,,daghan pamn unta angayang atimanon...