
Originally Posted by
carpe noctem*
oi..sa akong nasabtan, murag ni confess ni ang "businessman" sa monsignor..pwede diay ni niya i-divulge? dba ni against sa ethics?
ah well, maybe it's an exception
ok ang vigilante, at least naay kahadlokan ang mga bad elements..but apilon pud unta tong mga bigtime
pisti baya kay nang mga snatcher tan.awn ig human panglabni,hambugero kaayo kalma ra kaayo molakaw d pa modagan
well, the monsignor has to decide between breaking the "confessional vow" or being charged with "obstruction of justice". clearly he chose to break the vow. kasi tao lang po.
as for me, having no vigilantes around is not BS. it's against the law to kill another (well, except in times of war or self-defense), much more sa balaud sa Ginoo. Consenting to vigilante killings is uncivilized. other than his arrogance, that's one of the things i hate about Mayor Tomas is because he tolerates it.
besides, nawala ba ang tulis sa mga call center agents, banko, pawnshop, mall, etc sa aning mga vigilante? nka igo ba ni cla ug bigtime criminal? wala di ba?
AFAIK, ang Mandaue man gani cguro ang mas lower pa ug crime rate kaysa Cebu City. and besides, do u think those vigilantes have any assurances that they don't also commit robberies and other crimes too? i don't think so.