Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix

[iamdede]

---

di man na mu matter do..
kita mog mean girls starring lindsay lohan..
naa gud didto sa rachel mcadams.. hope sakto iya name.. nag portray ug hi skuler but in real life 30ish nana siiya..

[obemon]

I saw on the E channel the other day that since the 3 principal actors (Daniel, Rupert & Emma) are growing pretty fast these days, producers are trying to get this film done ASAP (before Rupert Grint grows more facial hair than Hagrid).

[tolstoi]

lolz..yep they still have to appear in book 6 and 7..and we all know that movies are mostly a year to make..so they will be 3 years older when they come out in book 7 movie.

[klavel]

I think all three lead stars signed up to do all 7 movies. Ako pa nila, they'd do 6 and 7 back to back in the future kay tiguwang na ni sila.

i've read in the internet that they sign contracts per picture..so there's no assurance that the three lead characters of Harry, Ron and Hermione will still be played in the sequels by Radcliffe, Grint and Watson (respectively)..but i hope they will still play their parts bec. everytime i read HP books, their faces/features are the ones i imagine..

[Miss A.M.]

I've read the book too, and this is my favorite book amongst the harry potter series. This has got to be the most action-packed harry potter.

Yes, I think OoTP is even a greater action-thriller than GoF -Â* although Goblet was my most delightful read of all the books...Â* Phoenix has lots of social and political undertones (and overtones!) - the story actually has deeper layers than I first thought. (Of course, I've read it twice now and plan to read more as the film approaches.)

Kahibawo mo, guys, I've been thinking about the Phoenix book and visualizing it in film form.Â* If they really do it RIGHT- I have a strong feeling this movie might just surprise the critics and award-giving bodies.Â* There are enough mature subjects, set pieces, dialogues, character growth and plot twists to expand the dramatic content. I'm quite hopeful that the young director, David Yates (who's critically acclaimed for his TV work, particularly in political dramas) can actually hack it.Â* And offer yet another take on the HP story... They're already receiving positive feedback for the superb casting.

Hello diay ninyo diha! Newbie pa ko diri but I'm starting to like it here kay maka-post ug Bisaya!Â* Ubang HP forums, strikto kaayo!Â* Thanks, Happy Valentine's Day to all!

Miss A.M.

[Miss A.M.]

di man na mu matter do..
kita mog mean girls starring lindsay lohan..
naa gud didto sa rachel mcadams.. hope sakto iya name.. nag portray ug hi skuler but in real life 30ish nana siiya..

You may have a point there, iamdede. In many films, actors play characters that are younger than their real age - and get away with it, most of the time... In Harry Potter alone, Shirley Henderson who plays the weepingly morose ghost Moaning Myrtle is actually 40 years old. Being age 35 at the time that she first played Moaning Myrtle, she is the oldest actor to play a Hogwarts student in the Harry Potter films. Now if they can film someone with at least 20 years difference in age, then 3 or 4 few years shouldn't be much of a problem.
Unless, of course, pwerte na gyung tiguwanga tan-awon ni Ron Weasley (who, I think, has the more serious "aging" problem of the trio) - in which case, make-up and CGI effects may have to be an option. But I don't think it will come to that (I hope!). The strongest appeal of the HP films to me is the principal Trio - I love seeing them grow up on screen...

[oliver_g0110]

I think there is a speculations that Gary Oldman will never reprise the role as Sirius Black! Patay... hehehe

[Miss A.M.]

I think there is a speculations that Gary Oldman will never reprise the role as Sirius Black! Patay... hehehe

Uy, I certainly hope not, Oliver.Â* Don't think it would be that effective if they use another actor, if only for the continuity factor (aside from the many fans' obvious preference of Gary Oldman for the role, and reportedly Dan Radcliffe's high regard for Oldman).Â* Alang-alang naman ilaha rang i-CGI/special effects si Oldman sa Phoenix (like in Goblet) - his character is way too pivotal in the story.

Bisan asa karon nga Harry Potter-related forums and websites, hot topic gyud ning reprisal ni Oldman as Sirius Black.Â* If you haven't checked this yet, here's an item from Veritaserum today:

Heyman clears up Gary Oldman misinformation
Posted by Matthew on 02-14-06 @ 4:00 PM

Harry Potter Producer David Heyman confirmed to The Hollywood Reporter that Warner Bros. is currently "in negotiations" with Gary Oldman (Sirius Black) and that he will most likely return for the fifth film, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix.

After Warner Bros. confirmed that Oldman would reprise his role in OotP two weeks ago, a statement from his manager saying that he had not yet signed a contract for the movie and would have to "pursue other employment" led to an uproar in the British media over the character of Sirius Black being "axed," and several rabid fans even started online petitions to boycott the film.

However, Heyman quashed these rumors earlier today, saying, "We're not shooting his part for quite a while, and as is always the case, you begin with the parts that are most pressing. We have every intention of having Gary Oldman play Sirius Black."
(end of post)

I paid attention to this cuz it supposedly came from David Heyman, producer of all HP films.Â* For me, he's the uber-man in the production (he's the main engine that's responsible for running the enormous HP franchise/machine all these years - and JK Rowling apparently trusts him very much).Â* Brilliant instincts (he discovered Dan Radcliffe way back in 2000 among the theater audience in one stage play Dan and his father watched), and even more brilliant production talent/skills.

[Miss A.M.]

I think there is a speculations that Gary Oldman will never reprise the role as Sirius Black! Patay... hehehe

Harry Potter Fan Zone and Harry Potter News Aggregator just posted this development:

OLDMAN'S REPRESENTATIVES: NO PLANS FOR PHOENIX
Posted by Andy on February 15, 6:14 AMÂ*

Gary Oldman's agents have responded to comments by producer David Heyman, who stated that WB. are currently in negotiations with Gary Oldman to reprise his role as Sirius Black in Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix. Oldman's representatives are suggesting that Heyman's comments are giving "false impressions" that he will appear in the film, and at this time - there are absolutely no plans for Gary to return.

DOUGLAS MANAGEMENT GROUP (Oldman's Reps) Latest Statement:
Source: http://www.douglasmanagementgroup.com/news/index.html

Feb. 14th, 2006:

Today an incorrect and erroneous story appeared in the Hollywood Reporter stating that Gary Oldman would be in the upcoming Potter film. The Hollywood Reporter ran the story without speaking with us. The story is accompanied with a quote from Potter producer David Heyman. David's comment and the story have been picked up and run all over the world giving the false impression that there are some kind of current plans for Mr. Oldman to appear in the upcoming Potter film. There are none at this time.

At this point all of our previous comments, listed on this site, remain accurate: there are currently no plans for Mr. Oldman to appear in this film and his representatives are actively seeking other employment for him. There are several films currently under offer to Mr. Oldman and he is considering all his options as one does.

The Reporter story today also indicated that Mr. Oldman is filming David Fincher's "Zodiac." Mr. Oldman is not in the film "Zodiac" and never was. It has been reported that he was playing the role of Melvin Belli. He is not. The part is being played by the wonderful actor Brian Cox.(end of article)

Hmm... Well, after Oldman's reps issued this statement alluding that Heyman's comments may have given people "false impressions" - murag lahi na ning istoryaha da, and it may have been the deal breaker.Â* Kung ikaw si David Heyman, would you still want to get Oldman and his people?!?Â* (sigh) Either kinahanglan na siguro ilisan ang management team ni Oldman or naay big snafu sa WB/Heyman's PR side.Â* Hopefully ma-resolve na ni nila.

But I'm now ready to consider another actor for Sirius Black.Â* I'd have preferred Oldman, but if gubot/way klaro gihapon, maayo pag lain na lang.Â* For all we know, the new actor might just be whole lots better.Â* The British film/theater industry does have an amazingly rich pool of talents...

[nolex]

the movie is now on its pre-production phase..although this will be release 2 years from now, but im posting it to give u an overview on whats coming.. :mrgreen:

naa cla age dilemma...example, Rupert Grint (Ron) is turning 17 this year but he will play the 15 year old Ron on this 5th book..unsa kaha resulta ani.. Â*

.................................................. ....................

Release Date: June 2007 (wide)

Release Date Note: (3/23/03) Because of the lengths of the fourth and this fifth novel (nearly 900 pages!), there have been reports that each of these books may actually each be produced as two separate films at the same time (like Lord of the Rings and the Matrix sequels), and then released in the same year. With the third film, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, scheduled for release in June, 2004, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire seems likely for 2005 or 2006, which suggests a 2006 or 2007 (or maybe even 200 release for this movie(s). Of course, the rapid aging of the kids is a big factor in these movies getting made so quickly. (7/5/03) In conjunction with the hype around the publication of this book, a Warner Bros. spokesperson recently announced that the release target for this movie is four years from now, in the summer of 2007, following the November, 2005 release of Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. The studio is timing the movies so that they are each about 15-18 months apart, and in either June or November. Following that logic, we can expect movie #6 to be released in November, 2008 and for the whole thing to wrap up with movie #7 in June, 2010.

Distributor: Warner Bros. Pictures

Distributor Notes: (3/23/03) When Warner Bros. first acquired the rights to produce 'Harry Potter' movies from J.K. Rowling, they only bought the first four films, with a "first look" option on this fifth in the 7-part series. Warner Bros. is expected to exercise that option, but that hasn't officially been announced yet. The word is that the film rights are expected to be secured by the June 21st, 2003 publication of the novel.

Production Company: 1492 Pictures, Heyday Films (the previous Harry Potter films)

Cast: Daniel Radcliffe (Harry Potter), Emma Watson (Hermione Granger), Rupert Grint (Ron Weasley), Ralph Fiennes (Lord Voldemort), David Bradley (Argus Filch), John Cleese (Nearly Headless Nick), Robbie Coltrane (Rubeus Hagrid), Alfie Enoch, Tom Felton (Draco Malfoy), Pam Ferris (Aunt Marge), Michael Gambon (Professor Albus Dumbledore), Jimmy Gardner (Ernie Prang), Richard Griffiths (Uncle Vernon Dursley), Joshua Herdman (Gregory Goyle), Jason Isaacs (Lucius Malfoy), Matt Lewis (Neville Longbottom), Miriam Margolyes (Profesor Sprout), Harry Melling (Dudley Dursley), Hugh Mitchell (Colin Creevey), Devon Murray (Seamus Finnigan), Katharine Nicholson (Pansy Parkinson), Gary Oldman (Sirius Black), James Phelps (Fred Weasley), Oliver Phelps (George Weasley), Chris Rankin (Percy Weasley), Alan Rickman (Professor Severus Snape), Fiona Shaw (Aunt Petunia Dursley), Maggie Smith (Professor Minerva McGonagall), Timothy Spall (Peter Pettigrew), David Thewlis (Remus Lupin), Julie Walters (Mrs. Molly Weasley), Jamie Waylett (Vincent Crabbe), Paul Whitehouse (Sir Cadogan), Bonnie Wright (Ginny Weasley)

Cast Notes: (3/23/03) The above list of actors (based upon actors who have appeared in past films) should be considered very tentative for a few reasons. First, it's possible that contract negotiations may cause any of them to not sign on for a fifth book/movie. Secondly, it's possible that in adapting such a long book, the scenes that these actors that include a particular character might not be in the film at all. Finally, since the book won't even be published for another three months, it's possible that some of them simply don't appear in the novel. (7/20/05) Daniel Radcliffe has confirmed that he will be returning to play Harry for the fifth time. So far he's the only cast member to go on record to be coming back.

New Characters Notes: (3/23/03) Every new 'Harry Potter' book/movie introduces new characters (including a new Defense Against the Dark Arts Professor), and this one is sure to be no different. The one character I've heard that will be introduced in this book is Mrs. Arabella Figg. Also, Mad-Eye Moody, who was introduced in Goblet of Fire, is expected to be seen again. (8/10/03) Someone has written in to let me know (since I've not yet read books #4 and #5) that Mrs. Figg is mentioned at least twice in Goblet of Fire, though I was probably not wrong in thinking her first film appearance will be in this one.

Director: David Yates (feature debut; he recently directed the HBO film The Girl in the Cafe)

Director Notes: (3/23/03) Concerning the job of director for this movie, there are four main possibilities at this point: 1) Alfonso Cuaron (Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban) may sign on for this movie as well; 2) Chris Columbus, who directed the first two movies, might return for the fifth; 3) a new director may come aboard the franchise starting with Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire and return for this fifth adaptation as well; and 4) someone new might be hired. On that last point, over the years, there have been many, many rumored directors for this or any other HP movie. There will probably be some new names mentioned by the time the job is actually filled. (4/16/03) Chris Columbus told CBBC News recently that he's definitely considering returning to the franchise with this fifth movie. (7/20/05) David Yates has been announced as the director. He's a well-regarded television director for the BBC, and this will be his first theatrical feature.

Screenwriter: Michael Goldenberg (Peter Pan, Contact)

Screenwriter Notes: (7/20/05) This will be the first Harry Potter movie not written by Steve Kloves.

Based Upon: This movie will be based upon the fifth novel in the 7-part 'Harry Potter' series, "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix" (which is 896 pages, the longest thus far), by British author J.K. Rowling, which will reach stores (in hardcover) on June 21st, 2003. The previous four films are: Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone (2001), Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (2002), Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (2004) and Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (2005 or 2006). (9/28/03) The British tabloid newspaper The Sun reported earlier this month that Warner Bros. has registered two titles that could be the titles of the sixth and seventh novels (and therefore, the sixth and seventh movies). The thing to remember, of course, is that the titles could be red herrings made up by Warner Bros. to throw people off. If they're real, however, the titles are 'Harry Potter and the Mudblood Revolt' and 'Harry Potter and the Quest of the Centaur.'

Premise: Harry Potter returns for his fifth year at Hogwarts still shaken by the tragedy of the previous year's Triwizard Tournament. With the Ministry of Magic denying the truth about Lord Voldemort's return, Harry has come under suspicion from the wizarding community. As Harry struggles with the problems at school, including the hateful new teacher Dolores Umbridge, he tries to learn more about the mysterious Order of the Phoenix and their role in the fight against the Dark Lord.

Premise Note: (3/23/03) I thought it would be fun to make a prediction three months early that the person who dies in this fifth book might be... Ginny Weasley. I say that having not even read the fourth book yet, but I just feel like hers would be the most tragic and poignant death (since she's close to Harry, and more importantly, so young!). The leading bets, however, are on Albus Dumbledore (which would pave the way for a new Hogwart's Headmaster) and Hagrid (who himself is a very tragic character). It's just of my nature to try to predict a "dark horse" candidate in these sort of things... even if I'm wildly wrong about Ginny, I *do* think it will be a surprise. We'll see. When I get the news of who it is in June, I will place the name in a spoiler warning.

(a few hours later) Hmmm... apparently, J.K. Rowling described the deceased as a "fan" of Harry's, which narrows the field considerably, and does indeed suggest it could be Ginny Weasley. In a way, I'm a bit disappointed that she's revealed that, because I was so proud of thinking of Ginny all by myself! Of course, Harry has many "fans" (that word could be interpreted very vaguely to include Hagrid, Dumbledore, or many others).

(3/30/03) I've gotten so many notes from fans about him that I guess I have to mention that another character who is a "fan of Harry", which leads many fans to think he's targeted-for-death is photography enthusiast Colin Creevey. I guess the reason I didn't mention him is that a) this whole thing started when I predicted Ginny *without* the benefit of knowing about the "fan" thing, and b) I figured people could just follow the links below and find out about Colin themselves. Anyway, this is all very academic, because that "fan" thing could be something of a red herring... aren't there about 20+ characters who could be described as fans, almost everyone except Slytherins (and even some of them *sort* of like Harry, like Prof. Snape, for example)?

Well, those who have read the book in the two weeks since its publication *know* the answer to this question now, but if you don't plan on reading the book, and just want to know which "fan of Harry" dies *anyway*, click and scroll over the following white "spoiler space": Sirius Black, the mysterious figure from the third book who turned out to actually be one of the good guys in the battle against the machinations against Voldemort.

Filming: (3/23/03) There is no known production start date for this film, though I can speculate that it will probably be sometime in 2005. (7/5/03) With the fourth movie not being released until late 2005, my best guess for when this might start filming would be in early 2006. In early 2006, Daniel Radcliffe, who will be playing the 15-year-old Harry Potter, will only be a year older, at 16 (as will Emma Watson). Rupert Grint, the senior of the starring trio, will be be a 17-year-old playing a 15-year-old. (7/20/05) The film is scheduled to start production on February 1st, 2006.

Genre: Action, Based on a Book, British, Eye Candy, Fantasy, Kids, Romance, Sequel, Supernatural, Teen

http://movies.yahoo.com/shop?d=hp&cf=prev&id=1808475611

do you have the full story of this or a book? or can you just give me the link for me to download it?.