Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 6789
Results 81 to 90 of 90

Thread: Quantum Theory

  1. #81

    Quote Originally Posted by vanschen View Post
    nice quote.

    MAY = possibly.

    if indertiminacy is freedom. then human c should arise from quantum c. but human c is different from quantum c. quantum c obeys the Uncertainty P which we dont normally experience. UP is insignificant in the mesoscopic level - the human level. though UP is reflected in a "situation" like claustrophobia - a spread wave when a particle is pinned down in a small space [Greene,s idea]. and in eureka [new: now that's funny] in Archimedes [my idea]. generally, thought spreads emotions and emotions spreads thought. though this and other situations reflect the UP, it does not in all situations. like when you drive and see the GPS map of where you are and where youre going [though my teacher told us that because of the UP you should think instead: " i know where im going but i dont know where i am. i know where i am but i dont know where i am going." this is impractical and much less pathological. [maybe true if its about life!]

    so i think, just my junk idea since i dont have any PHd, human consciousness is in between the indeterminate [quantum] and determinate [macroscopic]. this is the idea behind string theory and loop quantum gravity, that is to unify both micro and macro. maybe one day we,ll read a paper citing string theory or LQG by cognitive scientists.

    this is just a joke: if we were take the idea of quantum consiousness to its extreme then we,d all be with OCDs.
    yes yes, the first line is a thought. that struck me, i forgot about that "gap." but yeh, that is why, one must postulate of a medium in between , speculations speculations speculations arises from speculations.

    There must be a correspondence between the planck level and newtons' world, for after all, isn't that what particle physicists and astrophysicist are trying to achieve (and hope) when their marriage gave birth to quantum gravity, there must be some corresponding connection beyond the current perceived limitations to the field.

    exactly, not all situations - Limit-Situations. we all have to live with it i guess.

    or then again, consciousness could just be a joke in a way that it baffled humankind for a couple of centuries and then a guy comes over and tell us what it actually is, demonstrates and lectures that it really is just a trifle, only that we were seeking the answers in the wrong place, in all that it was just right under our noses. hehehe.

    then at the end, there would be no deviation, since all of us are the same.

  2. #82
    Banned User
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    1,782

    Default guys!

    Quote Originally Posted by The_Child View Post
    yes yes, the first line is a thought. that struck me, i forgot about that "gap." but yeh, that is why, one must postulate of a medium in between , speculations speculations speculations arises from speculations.

    There must be a correspondence between the planck level and newtons' world, for after all, isn't that what particle physicists and astrophysicist are trying to achieve (and hope) when their marriage gave birth to quantum gravity, there must be some corresponding connection beyond the current perceived limitations to the field.

    exactly, not all situations - Limit-Situations. we all have to live with it i guess.

    or then again, consciousness could just be a joke in a way that it baffled humankind for a couple of centuries and then a guy comes over and tell us what it actually is, demonstrates and lectures that it really is just a trifle, only that we were seeking the answers in the wrong place, in all that it was just right under our noses. hehehe.

    then at the end, there would be no deviation, since all of us are the same.
    You guys better enjoy Gods creation rather than thinking how he do it. . Einstien Spent his life wanting to read the mind of God. But he havent... How bout you? Life short so enjoy it.

  3. #83
    Quote Originally Posted by kebot View Post
    You guys better enjoy Gods creation rather than thinking how he do it. . Einstien Spent his life wanting to read the mind of God. But he havent... How bout you? Life short so enjoy it.
    it is that constant struggle to achieve an ecstatic union with God through an intimate encounter with his creation by mind and by action that one finds joy in living.

    do you enjoy life without struggle? I dont.

  4. #84
    Banned User
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    1,782
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Child View Post
    it is that constant struggle to achieve an ecstatic union with God through an intimate encounter with his creation by mind and by action that one finds joy in living.

    do you enjoy life without struggle? I dont.

    Who didnt struggle? hmmm. tsk tsk tsk. unneccessary strugle should be avoided or you will live in misery and compromise...

  5. #85
    hehehe. mediocrity by not struggling is misery.i guess we just have different worldviews.
    Last edited by The_Child; 05-22-2009 at 01:49 AM.

  6. #86
    C.I.A. regnauld's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    13,099
    Blog Entries
    6
    Masters and Mystics know intuitively that CONSCIOUSNESS alone is the source of CREATION and then... EVOLUTION!

  7. #87
    Banned User
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    1,782
    Quote Originally Posted by regnauld View Post
    Masters and Mystics know intuitively that CONSCIOUSNESS alone is the source of CREATION and then... EVOLUTION!
    Nice choice of words... hehehe Creation then Evolution... I affirm to this... nice job. But in reality Creationism says there is no evolution, and Evolution says its not Creationism theres just no proof. Well I think I can live with what regnauld ha said. BRAVO!

  8. #88
    C.I.A. regnauld's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    13,099
    Blog Entries
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by kebot View Post
    Nice choice of words... hehehe Creation then Evolution... I affirm to this... nice job. But in reality Creationism says there is no evolution, and Evolution says its not Creationism theres just no proof. Well I think I can live with what regnauld ha said. BRAVO!
    Yes there is an INTELLIGENT DESIGN (ID) and everything was not created at once! It EVOLVED millions and billions of years!

    Everything is EVOLVING as it should! - DESIDERATA!

  9. #89
    Quote Originally Posted by vanschen View Post
    i wish i were. a sayangtist.
    are you a physicist?

  10. #90

    Default Pc

    Quote Originally Posted by Hellblazer 2.1 View Post
    are you a physicist?

    nowhere near that. im just a physics convert.

  11.    Advertisement

Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 6789

Similar Threads

 
  1. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-29-2012, 09:13 PM
  2. Quantum Theory
    By sharkey360 in forum Video Games
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-18-2010, 12:46 PM
  3. Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory
    By Spec-V in forum Software & Games (Old)
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 02-07-2006, 10:25 PM
  4. Do you believed the Big Bang and evolution theory?
    By s.n.m.p. in forum Politics & Current Events
    Replies: 254
    Last Post: 01-05-2006, 04:23 PM
  5. thomas hobbes's theory
    By reklamador in forum Politics & Current Events
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-19-2005, 12:35 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
about us
We are the first Cebu Online Media.

iSTORYA.NET is Cebu's Biggest, Southern Philippines' Most Active, and the Philippines' Strongest Online Community!
follow us
#top